Cargando…
A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs
Upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is used to manage rheumatoid arthritis. The objective was to generate statistical evidence from the existing data for upadacitinib efficacy and safety in various treatment regimens with different dosages in active rheumatoid arthritis patients. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874682 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34384 |
_version_ | 1784899127891460096 |
---|---|
author | Panchal, Viraj Vyas, Bhavya H Sivasubramanian, Barath Prashanth Panchal, Kanan Patel, Harshank |
author_facet | Panchal, Viraj Vyas, Bhavya H Sivasubramanian, Barath Prashanth Panchal, Kanan Patel, Harshank |
author_sort | Panchal, Viraj |
collection | PubMed |
description | Upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is used to manage rheumatoid arthritis. The objective was to generate statistical evidence from the existing data for upadacitinib efficacy and safety in various treatment regimens with different dosages in active rheumatoid arthritis patients. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov using PRISMA guidelines, providing data on the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) score response at 12 weeks was the primary outcome measure. Safety in adverse events, infections, or hepatic dysfunction was considered. The Mantel-Haenszel formula with random effect was used for the pooled odds ratio (OR) at a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4. Statistical heterogeneity was reported using I2 statistics; I2 > 75% was considered significant heterogeneity. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data from 3233 patients were included in the analysis. The use of upadacitinib was associated with increased rates of achieving an ACR20 response compared with placebo (pooled OR 3.71; 95% CI 3.26-4.23; p-value <0.00001). Compared to a placebo, a 12 mg twice daily dose had the greatest effect, followed by a 15 mg once daily dose. Compared to the placebo, the incidence of any adverse event (pooled OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.36-2.02; p-value 0.0001) and infection (pooled OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.23-1.74; p-value 0.001) was found to be significantly higher in upadacitinib. Other adverse events, such as hepatic disorders and herpes zoster infections, were not statistically significant (p-value> 0.05). Maximum adverse events were seen at 12 mg twice daily. Upadacitinib, 15 mg once daily in combination with Methotrexate, was the most efficacious treatment regimen and was not associated with a significant risk for treatment-related adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9976645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99766452023-03-02 A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs Panchal, Viraj Vyas, Bhavya H Sivasubramanian, Barath Prashanth Panchal, Kanan Patel, Harshank Cureus Internal Medicine Upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is used to manage rheumatoid arthritis. The objective was to generate statistical evidence from the existing data for upadacitinib efficacy and safety in various treatment regimens with different dosages in active rheumatoid arthritis patients. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov using PRISMA guidelines, providing data on the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) score response at 12 weeks was the primary outcome measure. Safety in adverse events, infections, or hepatic dysfunction was considered. The Mantel-Haenszel formula with random effect was used for the pooled odds ratio (OR) at a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4. Statistical heterogeneity was reported using I2 statistics; I2 > 75% was considered significant heterogeneity. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data from 3233 patients were included in the analysis. The use of upadacitinib was associated with increased rates of achieving an ACR20 response compared with placebo (pooled OR 3.71; 95% CI 3.26-4.23; p-value <0.00001). Compared to a placebo, a 12 mg twice daily dose had the greatest effect, followed by a 15 mg once daily dose. Compared to the placebo, the incidence of any adverse event (pooled OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.36-2.02; p-value 0.0001) and infection (pooled OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.23-1.74; p-value 0.001) was found to be significantly higher in upadacitinib. Other adverse events, such as hepatic disorders and herpes zoster infections, were not statistically significant (p-value> 0.05). Maximum adverse events were seen at 12 mg twice daily. Upadacitinib, 15 mg once daily in combination with Methotrexate, was the most efficacious treatment regimen and was not associated with a significant risk for treatment-related adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cureus 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9976645/ /pubmed/36874682 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34384 Text en Copyright © 2023, Panchal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Internal Medicine Panchal, Viraj Vyas, Bhavya H Sivasubramanian, Barath Prashanth Panchal, Kanan Patel, Harshank A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs |
title | A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs |
title_full | A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs |
title_short | A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs |
title_sort | meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in treating rheumatoid arthritis in patients with inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs |
topic | Internal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874682 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panchalviraj ametaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT vyasbhavyah ametaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT sivasubramanianbarathprashanth ametaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT panchalkanan ametaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT patelharshank ametaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT panchalviraj metaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT vyasbhavyah metaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT sivasubramanianbarathprashanth metaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT panchalkanan metaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT patelharshank metaanalysisevaluatingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofupadacitinibintreatingrheumatoidarthritisinpatientswithinadequateresponsetodiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs |