Cargando…

Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The upper lip area is an important component of facial aesthetics, and aging produces an increase in the vertical height of the upper lip. Different upper lip lifting techniques are described in the literature. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess both invasive and noninvas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Hongli, Wang, Xiancheng, Qiao, Zhihua, Yang, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03302-5
_version_ 1784899135018631168
author Zhao, Hongli
Wang, Xiancheng
Qiao, Zhihua
Yang, Kai
author_facet Zhao, Hongli
Wang, Xiancheng
Qiao, Zhihua
Yang, Kai
author_sort Zhao, Hongli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The upper lip area is an important component of facial aesthetics, and aging produces an increase in the vertical height of the upper lip. Different upper lip lifting techniques are described in the literature. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess both invasive and noninvasive upper lip lifting techniques with patient satisfaction, adverse effects, and quantitative measurements of lifting efficiency. METHODS: This study was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (OvidSP), and Cochrane Library database were searched from September 14, 2022, to October 12, 2022. Inclusion criteria were reporting on upper lip lift efficiency with quantitative measurements of the lifting degree. RESULTS: Out of 495 studies through the search strategy, nine articles were included in the systematic review, eight for surgical procedures and one for nonsurgical. Surgical procedures seem to have better longevity than nonsurgical techniques. Reported patient satisfaction for both surgical and nonsurgical treatments was good with no severe complaints. The quantitative measures differ between researches and may be classified into two metrics: anatomy ratio computation using photographic analysis or direct height measurement with a caliper and precise parameters utilizing a three-dimensional method. CONCLUSION: In general, surgical therapies seem to have a longer-lasting lifting effect on upper lip lifts with an inevitable scar, while nonsurgical techniques are minimally invasive but temporary. There was a lack of consistency in the measurements used to assess lifting efficiency. A consistent quantitative assessment can be beneficial for both clinical decision-making and high-level evidence research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-023-03302-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9976673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99766732023-03-02 Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review Zhao, Hongli Wang, Xiancheng Qiao, Zhihua Yang, Kai Aesthetic Plast Surg Review BACKGROUND: The upper lip area is an important component of facial aesthetics, and aging produces an increase in the vertical height of the upper lip. Different upper lip lifting techniques are described in the literature. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess both invasive and noninvasive upper lip lifting techniques with patient satisfaction, adverse effects, and quantitative measurements of lifting efficiency. METHODS: This study was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (OvidSP), and Cochrane Library database were searched from September 14, 2022, to October 12, 2022. Inclusion criteria were reporting on upper lip lift efficiency with quantitative measurements of the lifting degree. RESULTS: Out of 495 studies through the search strategy, nine articles were included in the systematic review, eight for surgical procedures and one for nonsurgical. Surgical procedures seem to have better longevity than nonsurgical techniques. Reported patient satisfaction for both surgical and nonsurgical treatments was good with no severe complaints. The quantitative measures differ between researches and may be classified into two metrics: anatomy ratio computation using photographic analysis or direct height measurement with a caliper and precise parameters utilizing a three-dimensional method. CONCLUSION: In general, surgical therapies seem to have a longer-lasting lifting effect on upper lip lifts with an inevitable scar, while nonsurgical techniques are minimally invasive but temporary. There was a lack of consistency in the measurements used to assess lifting efficiency. A consistent quantitative assessment can be beneficial for both clinical decision-making and high-level evidence research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-023-03302-5. Springer US 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9976673/ /pubmed/36856780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03302-5 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review
Zhao, Hongli
Wang, Xiancheng
Qiao, Zhihua
Yang, Kai
Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review
title Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review
title_full Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review
title_short Different Techniques and Quantitative Measurements in Upper lip lift: A Systematic Review
title_sort different techniques and quantitative measurements in upper lip lift: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03302-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaohongli differenttechniquesandquantitativemeasurementsinupperlipliftasystematicreview
AT wangxiancheng differenttechniquesandquantitativemeasurementsinupperlipliftasystematicreview
AT qiaozhihua differenttechniquesandquantitativemeasurementsinupperlipliftasystematicreview
AT yangkai differenttechniquesandquantitativemeasurementsinupperlipliftasystematicreview