Cargando…
Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac157 |
_version_ | 1784899191372251136 |
---|---|
author | Hensel, Lukas Lange, Fabian Tscherpel, Caroline Viswanathan, Shivakumar Freytag, Jana Volz, Lukas J Eickhoff, Simon B Fink, Gereon R Grefkes, Christian |
author_facet | Hensel, Lukas Lange, Fabian Tscherpel, Caroline Viswanathan, Shivakumar Freytag, Jana Volz, Lukas J Eickhoff, Simon B Fink, Gereon R Grefkes, Christian |
author_sort | Hensel, Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in 18 recovered chronic stroke patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state functional MRI, motor task functional MRI, online-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, and 3D movement kinematics. Effects were compared against two control stimulation sites, i.e. contralesional M1 and a sham stimulation condition. We found that patients with good motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial residual deficits featured increased resting-state connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e. index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric connectivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9976969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99769692023-03-02 Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity Hensel, Lukas Lange, Fabian Tscherpel, Caroline Viswanathan, Shivakumar Freytag, Jana Volz, Lukas J Eickhoff, Simon B Fink, Gereon R Grefkes, Christian Brain Original Article Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in 18 recovered chronic stroke patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state functional MRI, motor task functional MRI, online-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, and 3D movement kinematics. Effects were compared against two control stimulation sites, i.e. contralesional M1 and a sham stimulation condition. We found that patients with good motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial residual deficits featured increased resting-state connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e. index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric connectivity. Oxford University Press 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9976969/ /pubmed/35485480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac157 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hensel, Lukas Lange, Fabian Tscherpel, Caroline Viswanathan, Shivakumar Freytag, Jana Volz, Lukas J Eickhoff, Simon B Fink, Gereon R Grefkes, Christian Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
title | Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
title_full | Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
title_fullStr | Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
title_short | Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
title_sort | recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hensellukas recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT langefabian recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT tscherpelcaroline recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT viswanathanshivakumar recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT freytagjana recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT volzlukasj recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT eickhoffsimonb recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT finkgereonr recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity AT grefkeschristian recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity |