Cargando…

Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity

Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hensel, Lukas, Lange, Fabian, Tscherpel, Caroline, Viswanathan, Shivakumar, Freytag, Jana, Volz, Lukas J, Eickhoff, Simon B, Fink, Gereon R, Grefkes, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac157
_version_ 1784899191372251136
author Hensel, Lukas
Lange, Fabian
Tscherpel, Caroline
Viswanathan, Shivakumar
Freytag, Jana
Volz, Lukas J
Eickhoff, Simon B
Fink, Gereon R
Grefkes, Christian
author_facet Hensel, Lukas
Lange, Fabian
Tscherpel, Caroline
Viswanathan, Shivakumar
Freytag, Jana
Volz, Lukas J
Eickhoff, Simon B
Fink, Gereon R
Grefkes, Christian
author_sort Hensel, Lukas
collection PubMed
description Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in 18 recovered chronic stroke patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state functional MRI, motor task functional MRI, online-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, and 3D movement kinematics. Effects were compared against two control stimulation sites, i.e. contralesional M1 and a sham stimulation condition. We found that patients with good motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial residual deficits featured increased resting-state connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e. index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric connectivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9976969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99769692023-03-02 Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity Hensel, Lukas Lange, Fabian Tscherpel, Caroline Viswanathan, Shivakumar Freytag, Jana Volz, Lukas J Eickhoff, Simon B Fink, Gereon R Grefkes, Christian Brain Original Article Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in 18 recovered chronic stroke patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state functional MRI, motor task functional MRI, online-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, and 3D movement kinematics. Effects were compared against two control stimulation sites, i.e. contralesional M1 and a sham stimulation condition. We found that patients with good motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial residual deficits featured increased resting-state connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e. index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric connectivity. Oxford University Press 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9976969/ /pubmed/35485480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac157 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Hensel, Lukas
Lange, Fabian
Tscherpel, Caroline
Viswanathan, Shivakumar
Freytag, Jana
Volz, Lukas J
Eickhoff, Simon B
Fink, Gereon R
Grefkes, Christian
Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
title Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
title_full Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
title_fullStr Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
title_full_unstemmed Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
title_short Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
title_sort recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac157
work_keys_str_mv AT hensellukas recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT langefabian recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT tscherpelcaroline recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT viswanathanshivakumar recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT freytagjana recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT volzlukasj recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT eickhoffsimonb recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT finkgereonr recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity
AT grefkeschristian recoveredgraspingperformanceafterstrokedependsoninterhemisphericfrontoparietalconnectivity