Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: Platelet‐rich plasma(PRP), with different concentration of leukocytes, may lead to varying effects in the treatment of cartilage lesions. So far, current research has not shown enough evidence on this. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intra‐articular injection with pure pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yiqin, Li, Haobo, Cao, Shiqi, Han, Yaguang, Shao, Jiahua, Fu, Qiwei, Wang, Bo, Wu, Jun, Xiang, Dong, Liu, Ziye, Wang, Huang, Zhu, Jun, Qian, Qirong, Yang, Xiaolei, Wang, Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13643
_version_ 1784899329712979968
author Zhou, Yiqin
Li, Haobo
Cao, Shiqi
Han, Yaguang
Shao, Jiahua
Fu, Qiwei
Wang, Bo
Wu, Jun
Xiang, Dong
Liu, Ziye
Wang, Huang
Zhu, Jun
Qian, Qirong
Yang, Xiaolei
Wang, Song
author_facet Zhou, Yiqin
Li, Haobo
Cao, Shiqi
Han, Yaguang
Shao, Jiahua
Fu, Qiwei
Wang, Bo
Wu, Jun
Xiang, Dong
Liu, Ziye
Wang, Huang
Zhu, Jun
Qian, Qirong
Yang, Xiaolei
Wang, Song
author_sort Zhou, Yiqin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Platelet‐rich plasma(PRP), with different concentration of leukocytes, may lead to varying effects in the treatment of cartilage lesions. So far, current research has not shown enough evidence on this. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intra‐articular injection with pure platelet‐rich plasma (P‐PRP) versus those of leukocyte platelet‐rich plasma (L‐PRP) in treating knee cartilage lesions, we conducted a double‐blind, randomized controlled clinical trial with a larger sample and longer follow‐up period. METHODS: From October 2019 to October 2020, 95 patients were invited to participate in our study, and 60 (63.2%) were randomized to P‐PRP (n = 30) or L‐PRP (n = 30) groups. Patients from the two groups were treated with knee intra‐articular injections of P‐PRP or L‐PRP. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were assessed using an unpaired t‐test for independent samples preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention. RESULTS: We followed up 27 cases in the P‐PRP group and 26 cases in the L‐PRP group. No significant differences in VAS and WOMAC scores were found between the two groups before the intervention (p > 0.05). The WOMAC Pain and VAS‐Motions scores of the P‐PRP group were significantly lower than those of the L‐PRP group at 6 weeks after the intervention (p < 0.05). While the long‐term clinical efficacy of both injections was similar and weakened after 12 months, more adverse events were found in the L‐PRP group. CONCLUSIONS: The short‐term results demonstrate a positive effect in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee cartilage lesions in the two groups. While the P‐PRP injection showed better clinical efficacy in the early phase of postoperative rehabilitation and resulted in fewer adverse events, long‐term follow‐up showed similar and weakened efficacy after 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900026365. Registered on October 3, 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43911.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9977604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99776042023-03-02 Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial Zhou, Yiqin Li, Haobo Cao, Shiqi Han, Yaguang Shao, Jiahua Fu, Qiwei Wang, Bo Wu, Jun Xiang, Dong Liu, Ziye Wang, Huang Zhu, Jun Qian, Qirong Yang, Xiaolei Wang, Song Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: Platelet‐rich plasma(PRP), with different concentration of leukocytes, may lead to varying effects in the treatment of cartilage lesions. So far, current research has not shown enough evidence on this. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intra‐articular injection with pure platelet‐rich plasma (P‐PRP) versus those of leukocyte platelet‐rich plasma (L‐PRP) in treating knee cartilage lesions, we conducted a double‐blind, randomized controlled clinical trial with a larger sample and longer follow‐up period. METHODS: From October 2019 to October 2020, 95 patients were invited to participate in our study, and 60 (63.2%) were randomized to P‐PRP (n = 30) or L‐PRP (n = 30) groups. Patients from the two groups were treated with knee intra‐articular injections of P‐PRP or L‐PRP. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were assessed using an unpaired t‐test for independent samples preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention. RESULTS: We followed up 27 cases in the P‐PRP group and 26 cases in the L‐PRP group. No significant differences in VAS and WOMAC scores were found between the two groups before the intervention (p > 0.05). The WOMAC Pain and VAS‐Motions scores of the P‐PRP group were significantly lower than those of the L‐PRP group at 6 weeks after the intervention (p < 0.05). While the long‐term clinical efficacy of both injections was similar and weakened after 12 months, more adverse events were found in the L‐PRP group. CONCLUSIONS: The short‐term results demonstrate a positive effect in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee cartilage lesions in the two groups. While the P‐PRP injection showed better clinical efficacy in the early phase of postoperative rehabilitation and resulted in fewer adverse events, long‐term follow‐up showed similar and weakened efficacy after 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900026365. Registered on October 3, 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43911. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9977604/ /pubmed/36647244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13643 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Zhou, Yiqin
Li, Haobo
Cao, Shiqi
Han, Yaguang
Shao, Jiahua
Fu, Qiwei
Wang, Bo
Wu, Jun
Xiang, Dong
Liu, Ziye
Wang, Huang
Zhu, Jun
Qian, Qirong
Yang, Xiaolei
Wang, Song
Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Clinical Efficacy of Intra‐Articular Injection with P‐PRP Versus that of L‐PRP in Treating Knee Cartilage Lesion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort clinical efficacy of intra‐articular injection with p‐prp versus that of l‐prp in treating knee cartilage lesion: a randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13643
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyiqin clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lihaobo clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caoshiqi clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hanyaguang clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shaojiahua clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fuqiwei clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangbo clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wujun clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiangdong clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuziye clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wanghuang clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhujun clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qianqirong clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangxiaolei clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangsong clinicalefficacyofintraarticularinjectionwithpprpversusthatoflprpintreatingkneecartilagelesionarandomizedcontrolledtrial