Cargando…

Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre

INTRODUCTION: Collimation of the primary beam is an important factor in radiography to reduce dose and improve image quality. The introduction of larger detector plates in direct digital radiography (DR) allows the exposed area to be calculated by removing cropping applied to the image. The aim of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Sally, McKerrow, Megan, Murphy, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.630
_version_ 1784899340451446784
author Ball, Sally
McKerrow, Megan
Murphy, Andrew
author_facet Ball, Sally
McKerrow, Megan
Murphy, Andrew
author_sort Ball, Sally
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Collimation of the primary beam is an important factor in radiography to reduce dose and improve image quality. The introduction of larger detector plates in direct digital radiography (DR) allows the exposed area to be calculated by removing cropping applied to the image. The aim of this study was to assess whether the exposed area was larger than a reference standard across five different projections on different body types, with the reference size being the corresponding cassette size used in traditional film/screen or computed radiography (CR). METHOD: A retrospective clinical audit of five common musculoskeletal radiographic projections (AP knee, AP shoulder, horizontal beam lateral hip, lateral cervical spine and lateral facial bones), of 359 patients was undertaken. The electronic cropping was removed from projections, and the superior–inferior, antero‐posterior and medio‐lateral collimation size was measured, depending on the projection. The two measurements were multiplied to give an exposed field of view area. The three measurements were compared with a reference standard, being the size of the corresponding cassette size used in the department on film/screen or computed radiography. RESULTS: From the five projections, 1071 measurements were analysed. 416 (38.8%) of these measurements were less than or equal to the agreed reference standard. 655 (61.2%) were greater than the agreed reference standard. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the majority (61.2%) of the measurements taken were above the reference standard. This results in an increase in radiation dose to patients and detrimental impacts on image quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9977647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99776472023-03-03 Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre Ball, Sally McKerrow, Megan Murphy, Andrew J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Collimation of the primary beam is an important factor in radiography to reduce dose and improve image quality. The introduction of larger detector plates in direct digital radiography (DR) allows the exposed area to be calculated by removing cropping applied to the image. The aim of this study was to assess whether the exposed area was larger than a reference standard across five different projections on different body types, with the reference size being the corresponding cassette size used in traditional film/screen or computed radiography (CR). METHOD: A retrospective clinical audit of five common musculoskeletal radiographic projections (AP knee, AP shoulder, horizontal beam lateral hip, lateral cervical spine and lateral facial bones), of 359 patients was undertaken. The electronic cropping was removed from projections, and the superior–inferior, antero‐posterior and medio‐lateral collimation size was measured, depending on the projection. The two measurements were multiplied to give an exposed field of view area. The three measurements were compared with a reference standard, being the size of the corresponding cassette size used in the department on film/screen or computed radiography. RESULTS: From the five projections, 1071 measurements were analysed. 416 (38.8%) of these measurements were less than or equal to the agreed reference standard. 655 (61.2%) were greater than the agreed reference standard. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the majority (61.2%) of the measurements taken were above the reference standard. This results in an increase in radiation dose to patients and detrimental impacts on image quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-01 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9977647/ /pubmed/36319191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.630 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ball, Sally
McKerrow, Megan
Murphy, Andrew
Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
title Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
title_full Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
title_fullStr Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
title_full_unstemmed Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
title_short Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
title_sort do radiographers collimate? a retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.630
work_keys_str_mv AT ballsally doradiographerscollimatearetrospectiveanalysisofradiographiccollimationofcommonmusculoskeletalexaminationsatanadulttraumacentre
AT mckerrowmegan doradiographerscollimatearetrospectiveanalysisofradiographiccollimationofcommonmusculoskeletalexaminationsatanadulttraumacentre
AT murphyandrew doradiographerscollimatearetrospectiveanalysisofradiographiccollimationofcommonmusculoskeletalexaminationsatanadulttraumacentre