Cargando…
Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients’ prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35697890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0 |
_version_ | 1784899352788992000 |
---|---|
author | van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik Middeldorp, Melissa Sultan, Arian Scheurlen, Cornelia Seuthe, Katharina Wörmann, Jonas Filipovic, Karlo Kadhim, Kadhim Sanders, Prashanthan Steven, Daniel Lüker, Jakob |
author_facet | van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik Middeldorp, Melissa Sultan, Arian Scheurlen, Cornelia Seuthe, Katharina Wörmann, Jonas Filipovic, Karlo Kadhim, Kadhim Sanders, Prashanthan Steven, Daniel Lüker, Jakob |
author_sort | van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients’ prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP ≤ 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. RESULTS: We included 64 consecutive patients (73 ± 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 ± 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1% ± 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range − 5 to + 47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range − 5 to + 10.7%); p = < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 ± 13.4%. CONCLUSION: In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinical trials.org in August 2019: NCT04065893. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9977698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99776982023-03-03 Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik Middeldorp, Melissa Sultan, Arian Scheurlen, Cornelia Seuthe, Katharina Wörmann, Jonas Filipovic, Karlo Kadhim, Kadhim Sanders, Prashanthan Steven, Daniel Lüker, Jakob J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients’ prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP ≤ 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. RESULTS: We included 64 consecutive patients (73 ± 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 ± 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1% ± 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range − 5 to + 47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range − 5 to + 10.7%); p = < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 ± 13.4%. CONCLUSION: In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinical trials.org in August 2019: NCT04065893. Springer US 2022-06-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9977698/ /pubmed/35697890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik Middeldorp, Melissa Sultan, Arian Scheurlen, Cornelia Seuthe, Katharina Wörmann, Jonas Filipovic, Karlo Kadhim, Kadhim Sanders, Prashanthan Steven, Daniel Lüker, Jakob Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title | Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full | Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_fullStr | Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_short | Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_sort | impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35697890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbruckjanhendrik impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT middeldorpmelissa impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT sultanarian impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT scheurlencornelia impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT seuthekatharina impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT wormannjonas impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT filipovickarlo impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT kadhimkadhim impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT sandersprashanthan impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT stevendaniel impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT lukerjakob impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy |