Cargando…

Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients’ prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik, Middeldorp, Melissa, Sultan, Arian, Scheurlen, Cornelia, Seuthe, Katharina, Wörmann, Jonas, Filipovic, Karlo, Kadhim, Kadhim, Sanders, Prashanthan, Steven, Daniel, Lüker, Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35697890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0
_version_ 1784899352788992000
author van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik
Middeldorp, Melissa
Sultan, Arian
Scheurlen, Cornelia
Seuthe, Katharina
Wörmann, Jonas
Filipovic, Karlo
Kadhim, Kadhim
Sanders, Prashanthan
Steven, Daniel
Lüker, Jakob
author_facet van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik
Middeldorp, Melissa
Sultan, Arian
Scheurlen, Cornelia
Seuthe, Katharina
Wörmann, Jonas
Filipovic, Karlo
Kadhim, Kadhim
Sanders, Prashanthan
Steven, Daniel
Lüker, Jakob
author_sort van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients’ prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP ≤ 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. RESULTS: We included 64 consecutive patients (73 ± 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 ± 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1% ± 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range − 5 to + 47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range − 5 to + 10.7%); p =  < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 ± 13.4%. CONCLUSION: In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinical trials.org in August 2019: NCT04065893.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9977698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99776982023-03-03 Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik Middeldorp, Melissa Sultan, Arian Scheurlen, Cornelia Seuthe, Katharina Wörmann, Jonas Filipovic, Karlo Kadhim, Kadhim Sanders, Prashanthan Steven, Daniel Lüker, Jakob J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients’ prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP ≤ 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. RESULTS: We included 64 consecutive patients (73 ± 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 ± 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1% ± 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range − 5 to + 47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range − 5 to + 10.7%); p =  < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 ± 13.4%. CONCLUSION: In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinical trials.org in August 2019: NCT04065893. Springer US 2022-06-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9977698/ /pubmed/35697890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik
Middeldorp, Melissa
Sultan, Arian
Scheurlen, Cornelia
Seuthe, Katharina
Wörmann, Jonas
Filipovic, Karlo
Kadhim, Kadhim
Sanders, Prashanthan
Steven, Daniel
Lüker, Jakob
Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
title Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_fullStr Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_short Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_sort impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35697890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbruckjanhendrik impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT middeldorpmelissa impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT sultanarian impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT scheurlencornelia impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT seuthekatharina impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT wormannjonas impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT filipovickarlo impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT kadhimkadhim impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT sandersprashanthan impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT stevendaniel impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT lukerjakob impactofventriculararrhythmiamanagementonsuboptimalbiventricularpacingincardiacresynchronizationtherapy