Cargando…

Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of established severity thresholds for Neck Disability Index (NDI) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few studies have examined the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geoghegan, Cara E., Mohan, Shruthi, Lynch, Conor P., Cha, Elliot D. K., Jacob, Kevin C., Patel, Madhav R., Prabhu, Michael C., Vanjani, Nisheka N., Pawlowski, Hanna, Singh, Kern
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35527536
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0414
_version_ 1784899414643441664
author Geoghegan, Cara E.
Mohan, Shruthi
Lynch, Conor P.
Cha, Elliot D. K.
Jacob, Kevin C.
Patel, Madhav R.
Prabhu, Michael C.
Vanjani, Nisheka N.
Pawlowski, Hanna
Singh, Kern
author_facet Geoghegan, Cara E.
Mohan, Shruthi
Lynch, Conor P.
Cha, Elliot D. K.
Jacob, Kevin C.
Patel, Madhav R.
Prabhu, Michael C.
Vanjani, Nisheka N.
Pawlowski, Hanna
Singh, Kern
author_sort Geoghegan, Cara E.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of established severity thresholds for Neck Disability Index (NDI) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few studies have examined the validity of established NDI threshold values among patients undergoing ACDF or CDA. METHODS: A surgical database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing cervical spine procedures. Demographics, operative characteristics, comorbidities, NDI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and 12-item Short Form (SF-12) physical and mental composite scores (PCS and MCS) were recorded. NDI severity was categorized using previously established threshold values. Improvement from preoperative scores at each postoperative timepoint and convergent validity of NDI was evaluated. Discriminant validity of NDI was evaluated against VAS neck and arm and SF-12 PCS and MCS. RESULTS: All 290 patients included in the study demonstrated significant improvements from baseline values for all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at all postoperative timepoints (p<0.001) except SF-12 MCS at 2 years (p=0.393). NDI showed a moderate-to-strong correlation (r≥0.419) at most timepoints for VAS neck, VAS arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS (p<0.001, all). NDI severity categories demonstrated significant differences in mean VAS neck, VAS arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS at all timepoints (p<0.001, all). Differences between NDI severity groups were not uniform for all PROMs. VAS neck values demonstrated significant intergroup differences at most timepoints, whereas SF-12 MCS showed significantly different values between most severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neck disability is strongly correlated with neck and arm pain, physical function, and mental health and demonstrates worse outcomes with increasing severity. Previously established severity categories may be more applicable to pain than physical function or mental health and may be more uniformly applied preoperatively for cervical spine patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9977990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99779902023-03-03 Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery Geoghegan, Cara E. Mohan, Shruthi Lynch, Conor P. Cha, Elliot D. K. Jacob, Kevin C. Patel, Madhav R. Prabhu, Michael C. Vanjani, Nisheka N. Pawlowski, Hanna Singh, Kern Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of established severity thresholds for Neck Disability Index (NDI) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few studies have examined the validity of established NDI threshold values among patients undergoing ACDF or CDA. METHODS: A surgical database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing cervical spine procedures. Demographics, operative characteristics, comorbidities, NDI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and 12-item Short Form (SF-12) physical and mental composite scores (PCS and MCS) were recorded. NDI severity was categorized using previously established threshold values. Improvement from preoperative scores at each postoperative timepoint and convergent validity of NDI was evaluated. Discriminant validity of NDI was evaluated against VAS neck and arm and SF-12 PCS and MCS. RESULTS: All 290 patients included in the study demonstrated significant improvements from baseline values for all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at all postoperative timepoints (p<0.001) except SF-12 MCS at 2 years (p=0.393). NDI showed a moderate-to-strong correlation (r≥0.419) at most timepoints for VAS neck, VAS arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS (p<0.001, all). NDI severity categories demonstrated significant differences in mean VAS neck, VAS arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS at all timepoints (p<0.001, all). Differences between NDI severity groups were not uniform for all PROMs. VAS neck values demonstrated significant intergroup differences at most timepoints, whereas SF-12 MCS showed significantly different values between most severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neck disability is strongly correlated with neck and arm pain, physical function, and mental health and demonstrates worse outcomes with increasing severity. Previously established severity categories may be more applicable to pain than physical function or mental health and may be more uniformly applied preoperatively for cervical spine patients. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2023-02 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9977990/ /pubmed/35527536 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0414 Text en Copyright © 2023 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Geoghegan, Cara E.
Mohan, Shruthi
Lynch, Conor P.
Cha, Elliot D. K.
Jacob, Kevin C.
Patel, Madhav R.
Prabhu, Michael C.
Vanjani, Nisheka N.
Pawlowski, Hanna
Singh, Kern
Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery
title Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery
title_full Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery
title_fullStr Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery
title_short Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery
title_sort validation of neck disability index severity among patients receiving one or two-level anterior cervical surgery
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35527536
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0414
work_keys_str_mv AT geoghegancarae validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT mohanshruthi validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT lynchconorp validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT chaelliotdk validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT jacobkevinc validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT patelmadhavr validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT prabhumichaelc validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT vanjaninishekan validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT pawlowskihanna validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery
AT singhkern validationofneckdisabilityindexseverityamongpatientsreceivingoneortwolevelanteriorcervicalsurgery