Cargando…
Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy
According to the World Health Organization, gastric cancer is the fifth most common type of tumor, and is the third most common cause of tumor-associated death. Although gastric cancer incidence rates have decreased in the past few decades, the prevalence of proximal gastric cancer has been steadily...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1115139 |
_version_ | 1784899417904513024 |
---|---|
author | Kolozsi, Peter Varga, Zsolt Toth, Dezso |
author_facet | Kolozsi, Peter Varga, Zsolt Toth, Dezso |
author_sort | Kolozsi, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the World Health Organization, gastric cancer is the fifth most common type of tumor, and is the third most common cause of tumor-associated death. Although gastric cancer incidence rates have decreased in the past few decades, the prevalence of proximal gastric cancer has been steadily rising in developed countries. Techniques regarding the improvement of treatment options must thus be developed. This can be achieved through incorporating both a wider use of endoscopic surgery (endoscopic mucosal resection—EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection—ESD) and a review of applied surgical interventions. Even though there is no single international consensus available, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) recommends proximal gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy in early gastric tumors. Despite recommendations from Asian guidelines and the short term outcomes of the KLASS 05 trial, surgical treatments in Western countries still rely on total gastrectomy. This is mostly due to technical and oncological challenges regarding surgical interventions in a proximal gastrectomy. However, the residual stomach after a proximal gastrectomy has been shown to diminish the incidence of dumping syndrome and anemia, and even improve postoperative quality of life (QoL). Therefore, it is necessary to define the place of proximal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9978003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99780032023-03-03 Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy Kolozsi, Peter Varga, Zsolt Toth, Dezso Front Surg Surgery According to the World Health Organization, gastric cancer is the fifth most common type of tumor, and is the third most common cause of tumor-associated death. Although gastric cancer incidence rates have decreased in the past few decades, the prevalence of proximal gastric cancer has been steadily rising in developed countries. Techniques regarding the improvement of treatment options must thus be developed. This can be achieved through incorporating both a wider use of endoscopic surgery (endoscopic mucosal resection—EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection—ESD) and a review of applied surgical interventions. Even though there is no single international consensus available, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) recommends proximal gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy in early gastric tumors. Despite recommendations from Asian guidelines and the short term outcomes of the KLASS 05 trial, surgical treatments in Western countries still rely on total gastrectomy. This is mostly due to technical and oncological challenges regarding surgical interventions in a proximal gastrectomy. However, the residual stomach after a proximal gastrectomy has been shown to diminish the incidence of dumping syndrome and anemia, and even improve postoperative quality of life (QoL). Therefore, it is necessary to define the place of proximal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9978003/ /pubmed/36874448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1115139 Text en © 2023 Kolozsi, Varga and Toth. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Kolozsi, Peter Varga, Zsolt Toth, Dezso Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
title | Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
title_full | Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
title_fullStr | Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
title_short | Indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
title_sort | indications and technical aspects of proximal gastrectomy |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1115139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolozsipeter indicationsandtechnicalaspectsofproximalgastrectomy AT vargazsolt indicationsandtechnicalaspectsofproximalgastrectomy AT tothdezso indicationsandtechnicalaspectsofproximalgastrectomy |