Cargando…
Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons
OBJECTIVE: To report the authors’ experience in a series of patients treated with cochlear implant (CI) revision surgery due to medical problems. METHODS: Revision CI surgeries performed in a tertiary referral centre for medical reasons not related to skin conditions were reviewed; patients were inc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860152 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2096 |
_version_ | 1784899491051077632 |
---|---|
author | Canzano, Federica Di Lella, Filippo Guida, Maurizio Pasanisi, Enrico Govoni, Marzo Falcioni, Maurizio |
author_facet | Canzano, Federica Di Lella, Filippo Guida, Maurizio Pasanisi, Enrico Govoni, Marzo Falcioni, Maurizio |
author_sort | Canzano, Federica |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To report the authors’ experience in a series of patients treated with cochlear implant (CI) revision surgery due to medical problems. METHODS: Revision CI surgeries performed in a tertiary referral centre for medical reasons not related to skin conditions were reviewed; patients were included if device removal was required. RESULTS: 17 cochlear implant patients were reviewed. The main reasons requiring revision surgery with device removal were: retraction pocket/iatrogenic cholesteatoma (6/17), chronic otitis (3/17), extrusion in previous canal wall down procedures (2/17) or in previous subtotal petrosectomy (2/17), misplacement/partial array insertion (2/17) and residual petrous bone cholesteatoma (2/17). In all cases surgery was performed through a subtotal petrosectomy. Cochlear fibrosis/ossification of the basal turn was found in 5 cases and uncovered mastoid portion of the facial nerve in 3 patients. The only complication was an abdominal seroma. A positive difference was observed between the number of active electrodes and comfort levels before and after revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In CI revision surgeries performed for medical reasons, subtotal petrosectomy offers invaluable advantages and should be considered as first choice during surgical planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9978301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99783012023-03-03 Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons Canzano, Federica Di Lella, Filippo Guida, Maurizio Pasanisi, Enrico Govoni, Marzo Falcioni, Maurizio Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Otology OBJECTIVE: To report the authors’ experience in a series of patients treated with cochlear implant (CI) revision surgery due to medical problems. METHODS: Revision CI surgeries performed in a tertiary referral centre for medical reasons not related to skin conditions were reviewed; patients were included if device removal was required. RESULTS: 17 cochlear implant patients were reviewed. The main reasons requiring revision surgery with device removal were: retraction pocket/iatrogenic cholesteatoma (6/17), chronic otitis (3/17), extrusion in previous canal wall down procedures (2/17) or in previous subtotal petrosectomy (2/17), misplacement/partial array insertion (2/17) and residual petrous bone cholesteatoma (2/17). In all cases surgery was performed through a subtotal petrosectomy. Cochlear fibrosis/ossification of the basal turn was found in 5 cases and uncovered mastoid portion of the facial nerve in 3 patients. The only complication was an abdominal seroma. A positive difference was observed between the number of active electrodes and comfort levels before and after revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In CI revision surgeries performed for medical reasons, subtotal petrosectomy offers invaluable advantages and should be considered as first choice during surgical planning. Pacini Editore Srl 2023-02-28 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9978301/ /pubmed/36860152 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2096 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Otology Canzano, Federica Di Lella, Filippo Guida, Maurizio Pasanisi, Enrico Govoni, Marzo Falcioni, Maurizio Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
title | Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
title_full | Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
title_fullStr | Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
title_full_unstemmed | Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
title_short | Revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
title_sort | revision cochlear implant surgery for clinical reasons |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860152 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canzanofederica revisioncochlearimplantsurgeryforclinicalreasons AT dilellafilippo revisioncochlearimplantsurgeryforclinicalreasons AT guidamaurizio revisioncochlearimplantsurgeryforclinicalreasons AT pasanisienrico revisioncochlearimplantsurgeryforclinicalreasons AT govonimarzo revisioncochlearimplantsurgeryforclinicalreasons AT falcionimaurizio revisioncochlearimplantsurgeryforclinicalreasons |