Cargando…

Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality. METHODS: A total of 40 patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianco, Maria Rita, Pricoco, Grazia Ornella, Azzolina, Alfio, Drago, Gaetano Davide, Saita, Vincenzo, Allegra, Eugenia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860146
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2253
_version_ 1784899491845898240
author Bianco, Maria Rita
Pricoco, Grazia Ornella
Azzolina, Alfio
Drago, Gaetano Davide
Saita, Vincenzo
Allegra, Eugenia
author_facet Bianco, Maria Rita
Pricoco, Grazia Ornella
Azzolina, Alfio
Drago, Gaetano Davide
Saita, Vincenzo
Allegra, Eugenia
author_sort Bianco, Maria Rita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy participated in the study. Speech rehabilitation was achieved through TES in 20 patients (Group A) or ES in 20 patients (Group B). Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin’ Sticks test. RESULTS: At olfactory evaluation, in Group A, 4/20 patients (20%) were anosmic, whereas 16/20 patients (80%) were hyposmic; in Group B, 11/20 patients (55%) were anosmic whereas 9/20 patients (45%) were hyposmic. A significant difference (p = 0.04) was found at global objective evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the rehabilitation with TES contributes to maintaining a functioning, albeit limited, sense of smell.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99783042023-03-03 Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech Bianco, Maria Rita Pricoco, Grazia Ornella Azzolina, Alfio Drago, Gaetano Davide Saita, Vincenzo Allegra, Eugenia Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy participated in the study. Speech rehabilitation was achieved through TES in 20 patients (Group A) or ES in 20 patients (Group B). Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin’ Sticks test. RESULTS: At olfactory evaluation, in Group A, 4/20 patients (20%) were anosmic, whereas 16/20 patients (80%) were hyposmic; in Group B, 11/20 patients (55%) were anosmic whereas 9/20 patients (45%) were hyposmic. A significant difference (p = 0.04) was found at global objective evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the rehabilitation with TES contributes to maintaining a functioning, albeit limited, sense of smell. Pacini Editore Srl 2023-02-28 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9978304/ /pubmed/36860146 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2253 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Bianco, Maria Rita
Pricoco, Grazia Ornella
Azzolina, Alfio
Drago, Gaetano Davide
Saita, Vincenzo
Allegra, Eugenia
Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
title Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
title_full Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
title_fullStr Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
title_full_unstemmed Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
title_short Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
title_sort olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860146
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2253
work_keys_str_mv AT biancomariarita olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech
AT pricocograziaornella olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech
AT azzolinaalfio olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech
AT dragogaetanodavide olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech
AT saitavincenzo olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech
AT allegraeugenia olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech