Cargando…
Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality. METHODS: A total of 40 patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860146 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2253 |
_version_ | 1784899491845898240 |
---|---|
author | Bianco, Maria Rita Pricoco, Grazia Ornella Azzolina, Alfio Drago, Gaetano Davide Saita, Vincenzo Allegra, Eugenia |
author_facet | Bianco, Maria Rita Pricoco, Grazia Ornella Azzolina, Alfio Drago, Gaetano Davide Saita, Vincenzo Allegra, Eugenia |
author_sort | Bianco, Maria Rita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy participated in the study. Speech rehabilitation was achieved through TES in 20 patients (Group A) or ES in 20 patients (Group B). Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin’ Sticks test. RESULTS: At olfactory evaluation, in Group A, 4/20 patients (20%) were anosmic, whereas 16/20 patients (80%) were hyposmic; in Group B, 11/20 patients (55%) were anosmic whereas 9/20 patients (45%) were hyposmic. A significant difference (p = 0.04) was found at global objective evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the rehabilitation with TES contributes to maintaining a functioning, albeit limited, sense of smell. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9978304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99783042023-03-03 Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech Bianco, Maria Rita Pricoco, Grazia Ornella Azzolina, Alfio Drago, Gaetano Davide Saita, Vincenzo Allegra, Eugenia Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy participated in the study. Speech rehabilitation was achieved through TES in 20 patients (Group A) or ES in 20 patients (Group B). Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin’ Sticks test. RESULTS: At olfactory evaluation, in Group A, 4/20 patients (20%) were anosmic, whereas 16/20 patients (80%) were hyposmic; in Group B, 11/20 patients (55%) were anosmic whereas 9/20 patients (45%) were hyposmic. A significant difference (p = 0.04) was found at global objective evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the rehabilitation with TES contributes to maintaining a functioning, albeit limited, sense of smell. Pacini Editore Srl 2023-02-28 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9978304/ /pubmed/36860146 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2253 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Bianco, Maria Rita Pricoco, Grazia Ornella Azzolina, Alfio Drago, Gaetano Davide Saita, Vincenzo Allegra, Eugenia Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
title | Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
title_full | Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
title_fullStr | Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
title_full_unstemmed | Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
title_short | Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
title_sort | olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860146 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biancomariarita olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech AT pricocograziaornella olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech AT azzolinaalfio olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech AT dragogaetanodavide olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech AT saitavincenzo olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech AT allegraeugenia olfactoryfunctioninlaryngectomisedpatientstracheooesophagealversusoesophagealspeech |