Cargando…

Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria

Traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria restrict study populations, perpetuating enrollment disparities. We aimed to assess implementation of modernized eligibility criteria guidelines among pancreatic cancer (PC) clinical trials. Interventional PC trials in the United States since January 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riner, Andrea N, Freudenberger, Devon C, Herremans, Kelly M, Vudatha, Vignesh, Neal, Daniel W, George, Thomas J, Trevino, Jose G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36806713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad009
_version_ 1784899494334169088
author Riner, Andrea N
Freudenberger, Devon C
Herremans, Kelly M
Vudatha, Vignesh
Neal, Daniel W
George, Thomas J
Trevino, Jose G
author_facet Riner, Andrea N
Freudenberger, Devon C
Herremans, Kelly M
Vudatha, Vignesh
Neal, Daniel W
George, Thomas J
Trevino, Jose G
author_sort Riner, Andrea N
collection PubMed
description Traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria restrict study populations, perpetuating enrollment disparities. We aimed to assess implementation of modernized eligibility criteria guidelines among pancreatic cancer (PC) clinical trials. Interventional PC trials in the United States since January 1, 2014, were identified via clinicaltrials.gov with December 31, 2017, as the transition for pre- and postguidance eras. Trials were assessed for guideline compliance and compared using Fisher exact test. In total, 198 trials were identified: 86 (43.4%) were pre- and 112 (56.6%) postguidance era. Improvements were seen in allowing patients with history of HIV (8.6% vs 43.8%; P < .0001), prior cancer (57.0% vs 72.3%; P = .034), or concurrent and/or stable cancer (2.1% vs 31.1%; P < .0001) to participate. Most (>95%) trials were compliant with laboratory reference ranges, QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) cutoffs, and rationalizing excluding prior therapies both pre- and postguidance eras. However, overall compliance with modernized criteria remains poor. We advocate for stakeholders to update protocols and scrutinize traditionally restrictive eligibility criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99783142023-03-03 Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria Riner, Andrea N Freudenberger, Devon C Herremans, Kelly M Vudatha, Vignesh Neal, Daniel W George, Thomas J Trevino, Jose G JNCI Cancer Spectr Brief Communications Traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria restrict study populations, perpetuating enrollment disparities. We aimed to assess implementation of modernized eligibility criteria guidelines among pancreatic cancer (PC) clinical trials. Interventional PC trials in the United States since January 1, 2014, were identified via clinicaltrials.gov with December 31, 2017, as the transition for pre- and postguidance eras. Trials were assessed for guideline compliance and compared using Fisher exact test. In total, 198 trials were identified: 86 (43.4%) were pre- and 112 (56.6%) postguidance era. Improvements were seen in allowing patients with history of HIV (8.6% vs 43.8%; P < .0001), prior cancer (57.0% vs 72.3%; P = .034), or concurrent and/or stable cancer (2.1% vs 31.1%; P < .0001) to participate. Most (>95%) trials were compliant with laboratory reference ranges, QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) cutoffs, and rationalizing excluding prior therapies both pre- and postguidance eras. However, overall compliance with modernized criteria remains poor. We advocate for stakeholders to update protocols and scrutinize traditionally restrictive eligibility criteria. Oxford University Press 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9978314/ /pubmed/36806713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad009 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communications
Riner, Andrea N
Freudenberger, Devon C
Herremans, Kelly M
Vudatha, Vignesh
Neal, Daniel W
George, Thomas J
Trevino, Jose G
Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
title Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
title_full Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
title_fullStr Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
title_full_unstemmed Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
title_short Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
title_sort call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
topic Brief Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36806713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad009
work_keys_str_mv AT rinerandrean calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria
AT freudenbergerdevonc calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria
AT herremanskellym calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria
AT vudathavignesh calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria
AT nealdanielw calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria
AT georgethomasj calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria
AT trevinojoseg calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria