Cargando…
Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria
Traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria restrict study populations, perpetuating enrollment disparities. We aimed to assess implementation of modernized eligibility criteria guidelines among pancreatic cancer (PC) clinical trials. Interventional PC trials in the United States since January 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36806713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad009 |
_version_ | 1784899494334169088 |
---|---|
author | Riner, Andrea N Freudenberger, Devon C Herremans, Kelly M Vudatha, Vignesh Neal, Daniel W George, Thomas J Trevino, Jose G |
author_facet | Riner, Andrea N Freudenberger, Devon C Herremans, Kelly M Vudatha, Vignesh Neal, Daniel W George, Thomas J Trevino, Jose G |
author_sort | Riner, Andrea N |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria restrict study populations, perpetuating enrollment disparities. We aimed to assess implementation of modernized eligibility criteria guidelines among pancreatic cancer (PC) clinical trials. Interventional PC trials in the United States since January 1, 2014, were identified via clinicaltrials.gov with December 31, 2017, as the transition for pre- and postguidance eras. Trials were assessed for guideline compliance and compared using Fisher exact test. In total, 198 trials were identified: 86 (43.4%) were pre- and 112 (56.6%) postguidance era. Improvements were seen in allowing patients with history of HIV (8.6% vs 43.8%; P < .0001), prior cancer (57.0% vs 72.3%; P = .034), or concurrent and/or stable cancer (2.1% vs 31.1%; P < .0001) to participate. Most (>95%) trials were compliant with laboratory reference ranges, QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) cutoffs, and rationalizing excluding prior therapies both pre- and postguidance eras. However, overall compliance with modernized criteria remains poor. We advocate for stakeholders to update protocols and scrutinize traditionally restrictive eligibility criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9978314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99783142023-03-03 Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria Riner, Andrea N Freudenberger, Devon C Herremans, Kelly M Vudatha, Vignesh Neal, Daniel W George, Thomas J Trevino, Jose G JNCI Cancer Spectr Brief Communications Traditional clinical trial eligibility criteria restrict study populations, perpetuating enrollment disparities. We aimed to assess implementation of modernized eligibility criteria guidelines among pancreatic cancer (PC) clinical trials. Interventional PC trials in the United States since January 1, 2014, were identified via clinicaltrials.gov with December 31, 2017, as the transition for pre- and postguidance eras. Trials were assessed for guideline compliance and compared using Fisher exact test. In total, 198 trials were identified: 86 (43.4%) were pre- and 112 (56.6%) postguidance era. Improvements were seen in allowing patients with history of HIV (8.6% vs 43.8%; P < .0001), prior cancer (57.0% vs 72.3%; P = .034), or concurrent and/or stable cancer (2.1% vs 31.1%; P < .0001) to participate. Most (>95%) trials were compliant with laboratory reference ranges, QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) cutoffs, and rationalizing excluding prior therapies both pre- and postguidance eras. However, overall compliance with modernized criteria remains poor. We advocate for stakeholders to update protocols and scrutinize traditionally restrictive eligibility criteria. Oxford University Press 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9978314/ /pubmed/36806713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad009 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communications Riner, Andrea N Freudenberger, Devon C Herremans, Kelly M Vudatha, Vignesh Neal, Daniel W George, Thomas J Trevino, Jose G Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
title | Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
title_full | Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
title_fullStr | Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
title_short | Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
title_sort | call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria |
topic | Brief Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36806713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rinerandrean calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria AT freudenbergerdevonc calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria AT herremanskellym calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria AT vudathavignesh calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria AT nealdanielw calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria AT georgethomasj calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria AT trevinojoseg calltoactionovercomingenrollmentdisparitiesincancerclinicaltrialswithmodernizedeligibilitycriteria |