Cargando…

The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity

Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Qianwen, Yang, Zhibing, Qiu, Rui, Cheng, Sizhe, Zhu, Xia, Han, Zheyi, Xiao, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876
_version_ 1784899527002554368
author Wu, Qianwen
Yang, Zhibing
Qiu, Rui
Cheng, Sizhe
Zhu, Xia
Han, Zheyi
Xiao, Wei
author_facet Wu, Qianwen
Yang, Zhibing
Qiu, Rui
Cheng, Sizhe
Zhu, Xia
Han, Zheyi
Xiao, Wei
author_sort Wu, Qianwen
collection PubMed
description Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this population, to date, none have focused on occupational stress. Hence, we developed the Military Occupational Stress Response Scale (MOSRS) to provide a tool to objectively measure soldiers' occupational stress responses. An initial pool of 27 items was assembled from the literature, existing instruments, and interviews with soldiers. Of those 27, 17 were included in the MOSRS. The scale was subsequently completed by soldiers from one military region, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus8.3 and IBM SPSS 28.0 software, respectively. A total of 847 officers and soldiers were selected for scale testing, and 670 subjects were retained after data cleaning and screening according to the set criteria. After performing the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test, principal components analysis (PCA) was appropriate. The PCA yielded a three-factor model (physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses) with the items and factors strongly correlated. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed loads ranging from between 0.499 and 0.878 for each item. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the MOSRS was between 0.710 and 0.900, and the Omega reliability was between 0.714 and 0.898, which were all higher than the critical standard value of 0.7, indicating that the scale has good reliability. Analysis of the discrimination validity of each dimension revealed that the scale has good discrimination validity. The MOSRS demonstrated sound psychometric characteristics with acceptable reliability and validity, suggesting that it could be used to assess occupational stress in military personnel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99784652023-03-03 The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity Wu, Qianwen Yang, Zhibing Qiu, Rui Cheng, Sizhe Zhu, Xia Han, Zheyi Xiao, Wei Front Psychol Psychology Soldiers in the military are exposed to numerous stressors, including some that are of an extreme nature. The main objective of this military psychology research study was to evaluate soldiers' occupational stress. Even though several tools have been developed to measure stress in this population, to date, none have focused on occupational stress. Hence, we developed the Military Occupational Stress Response Scale (MOSRS) to provide a tool to objectively measure soldiers' occupational stress responses. An initial pool of 27 items was assembled from the literature, existing instruments, and interviews with soldiers. Of those 27, 17 were included in the MOSRS. The scale was subsequently completed by soldiers from one military region, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus8.3 and IBM SPSS 28.0 software, respectively. A total of 847 officers and soldiers were selected for scale testing, and 670 subjects were retained after data cleaning and screening according to the set criteria. After performing the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test, principal components analysis (PCA) was appropriate. The PCA yielded a three-factor model (physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses) with the items and factors strongly correlated. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed loads ranging from between 0.499 and 0.878 for each item. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the MOSRS was between 0.710 and 0.900, and the Omega reliability was between 0.714 and 0.898, which were all higher than the critical standard value of 0.7, indicating that the scale has good reliability. Analysis of the discrimination validity of each dimension revealed that the scale has good discrimination validity. The MOSRS demonstrated sound psychometric characteristics with acceptable reliability and validity, suggesting that it could be used to assess occupational stress in military personnel. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9978465/ /pubmed/36874833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wu, Yang, Qiu, Cheng, Zhu, Han and Xiao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wu, Qianwen
Yang, Zhibing
Qiu, Rui
Cheng, Sizhe
Zhu, Xia
Han, Zheyi
Xiao, Wei
The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
title The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
title_full The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
title_fullStr The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
title_full_unstemmed The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
title_short The military occupational stress response scale: Development, reliability, and validity
title_sort military occupational stress response scale: development, reliability, and validity
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032876
work_keys_str_mv AT wuqianwen themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT yangzhibing themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT qiurui themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT chengsizhe themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT zhuxia themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT hanzheyi themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT xiaowei themilitaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT wuqianwen militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT yangzhibing militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT qiurui militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT chengsizhe militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT zhuxia militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT hanzheyi militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity
AT xiaowei militaryoccupationalstressresponsescaledevelopmentreliabilityandvalidity