Cargando…

Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences

OBJECTIVES: This study compared different extraction methods of Yizhiqingxin formula (YQF) and its neuroprotective effects based on pharmacodynamic indices such as learning and memory ability, brain tissue histopathology and morphology, and inflammatory factor expression in a mouse model of Alzheime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Wei, Pei, Hui, Ma, Li-Na, Zheng, Rui, Huang, Qiao-Yi, Chang, Su-rui, Cao, Yu, Li, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1097859
_version_ 1784899529590439936
author Wei, Wei
Pei, Hui
Ma, Li-Na
Zheng, Rui
Huang, Qiao-Yi
Chang, Su-rui
Cao, Yu
Li, Hao
author_facet Wei, Wei
Pei, Hui
Ma, Li-Na
Zheng, Rui
Huang, Qiao-Yi
Chang, Su-rui
Cao, Yu
Li, Hao
author_sort Wei, Wei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study compared different extraction methods of Yizhiqingxin formula (YQF) and its neuroprotective effects based on pharmacodynamic indices such as learning and memory ability, brain tissue histopathology and morphology, and inflammatory factor expression in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). METHODS: The pharmaceutical components of YQF were extracted using three extraction processes, and the components were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography. Donepezil hydrochloride was used as a positive control drug. Fifty 7–8-month-old 3 × Tg AD mice were randomly divided into three YQF groups (YQF-1, YQF-2, and YQF-3), a donepezil group, and a model group. Ten age-matched C57/BL6 mice were used as normal controls. YQF and Donepezil were administered by gavage at a clinically equivalent dose of 2.6 and 1.3 mg⋅kg(–1)⋅d(–1), respectively, with a gavage volume of 0.1 ml/10 g. Control and model groups received equal volumes of distilled water by gavage. After 2 months, the efficacy was evaluated using behavioral experiments, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and serum assays. RESULTS: The main components in YQF are ginsenoside Re, ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Rb1, epiberberine, coptisine chloride, palmatine, berberine, and ferulic acid. YQF-3 (alcohol extraction) has the highest content of active compounds, followed by YQF-2 (water extraction and alcohol precipitation method). Compared to the model group, the three YQF groups showed alleviated histopathological changes and improved spatial learning and memory, with the effect in YQF-2 being the most significant. YQF showed protection of hippocampal neurons, most significantly in the YQF-1 group. YQF significantly reduced Aβ pathology and tau hyperphosphorylation, decreased expressions of serum pro-inflammatory factors interleukin-2 and interleukin-6 as well as serum chemokines MCP-1 and MIG. CONCLUSION: YQF prepared by three different processes showed differences in pharmacodynamics in an AD mouse model. YQF-2 was significantly better than the other extraction processes in improving memory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99784752023-03-03 Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences Wei, Wei Pei, Hui Ma, Li-Na Zheng, Rui Huang, Qiao-Yi Chang, Su-rui Cao, Yu Li, Hao Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: This study compared different extraction methods of Yizhiqingxin formula (YQF) and its neuroprotective effects based on pharmacodynamic indices such as learning and memory ability, brain tissue histopathology and morphology, and inflammatory factor expression in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). METHODS: The pharmaceutical components of YQF were extracted using three extraction processes, and the components were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography. Donepezil hydrochloride was used as a positive control drug. Fifty 7–8-month-old 3 × Tg AD mice were randomly divided into three YQF groups (YQF-1, YQF-2, and YQF-3), a donepezil group, and a model group. Ten age-matched C57/BL6 mice were used as normal controls. YQF and Donepezil were administered by gavage at a clinically equivalent dose of 2.6 and 1.3 mg⋅kg(–1)⋅d(–1), respectively, with a gavage volume of 0.1 ml/10 g. Control and model groups received equal volumes of distilled water by gavage. After 2 months, the efficacy was evaluated using behavioral experiments, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and serum assays. RESULTS: The main components in YQF are ginsenoside Re, ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Rb1, epiberberine, coptisine chloride, palmatine, berberine, and ferulic acid. YQF-3 (alcohol extraction) has the highest content of active compounds, followed by YQF-2 (water extraction and alcohol precipitation method). Compared to the model group, the three YQF groups showed alleviated histopathological changes and improved spatial learning and memory, with the effect in YQF-2 being the most significant. YQF showed protection of hippocampal neurons, most significantly in the YQF-1 group. YQF significantly reduced Aβ pathology and tau hyperphosphorylation, decreased expressions of serum pro-inflammatory factors interleukin-2 and interleukin-6 as well as serum chemokines MCP-1 and MIG. CONCLUSION: YQF prepared by three different processes showed differences in pharmacodynamics in an AD mouse model. YQF-2 was significantly better than the other extraction processes in improving memory. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9978475/ /pubmed/36875667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1097859 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wei, Pei, Ma, Zheng, Huang, Chang, Cao and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wei, Wei
Pei, Hui
Ma, Li-Na
Zheng, Rui
Huang, Qiao-Yi
Chang, Su-rui
Cao, Yu
Li, Hao
Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
title Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
title_full Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
title_fullStr Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
title_short Comparison of Yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
title_sort comparison of yizhiqingxin formula extraction methods and their pharmacodynamic differences
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1097859
work_keys_str_mv AT weiwei comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT peihui comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT malina comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT zhengrui comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT huangqiaoyi comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT changsurui comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT caoyu comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences
AT lihao comparisonofyizhiqingxinformulaextractionmethodsandtheirpharmacodynamicdifferences