Cargando…

Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer

The objective of this study is to compare the plan robustness at various beam angles. Hence, the influence of the beam angles on robustness and linear energy transfer (LET) was evaluated in gantry-based carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer. 10 patients with prostate cancer were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Han-Back, Kim, Changhwan, Han, Min Cheol, Hong, Chae-Seon, Park, Seyjoon, Koom, Woong Sub, Kim, Jin Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1054693
_version_ 1784899533821444096
author Shin, Han-Back
Kim, Changhwan
Han, Min Cheol
Hong, Chae-Seon
Park, Seyjoon
Koom, Woong Sub
Kim, Jin Sung
author_facet Shin, Han-Back
Kim, Changhwan
Han, Min Cheol
Hong, Chae-Seon
Park, Seyjoon
Koom, Woong Sub
Kim, Jin Sung
author_sort Shin, Han-Back
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to compare the plan robustness at various beam angles. Hence, the influence of the beam angles on robustness and linear energy transfer (LET) was evaluated in gantry-based carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer. 10 patients with prostate cancer were considered, and a total dose of 51.6 Gy (Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was prescribed for the target volume in 12 fractions. Five beam field plans comprising two opposed fields with different angle pairs were characterized. Further, dose parameters were extracted, and the RBE-weighted dose and LET values for all angle pairs were compared. All plans considering the setup uncertainty satisfied the dose regimen. When a parallel beam pair was used for perturbed scenarios to take into account set-up uncertainty in the anterior direction, the LET clinical treatment volume (CTV) D (95%) standard deviation was 1.5 times higher, and the standard deviation of RBE-weighted CTV D (95%) was 7.9 times higher compared to an oblique pair. The oblique beam fields were superior in terms of dose sparing for the rectum compared to the dose distribution using two conventional lateral opposed fields for prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99784912023-03-03 Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer Shin, Han-Back Kim, Changhwan Han, Min Cheol Hong, Chae-Seon Park, Seyjoon Koom, Woong Sub Kim, Jin Sung Front Oncol Oncology The objective of this study is to compare the plan robustness at various beam angles. Hence, the influence of the beam angles on robustness and linear energy transfer (LET) was evaluated in gantry-based carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer. 10 patients with prostate cancer were considered, and a total dose of 51.6 Gy (Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was prescribed for the target volume in 12 fractions. Five beam field plans comprising two opposed fields with different angle pairs were characterized. Further, dose parameters were extracted, and the RBE-weighted dose and LET values for all angle pairs were compared. All plans considering the setup uncertainty satisfied the dose regimen. When a parallel beam pair was used for perturbed scenarios to take into account set-up uncertainty in the anterior direction, the LET clinical treatment volume (CTV) D (95%) standard deviation was 1.5 times higher, and the standard deviation of RBE-weighted CTV D (95%) was 7.9 times higher compared to an oblique pair. The oblique beam fields were superior in terms of dose sparing for the rectum compared to the dose distribution using two conventional lateral opposed fields for prostate cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9978491/ /pubmed/36874141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1054693 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shin, Kim, Han, Hong, Park, Koom and Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Shin, Han-Back
Kim, Changhwan
Han, Min Cheol
Hong, Chae-Seon
Park, Seyjoon
Koom, Woong Sub
Kim, Jin Sung
Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_full Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_short Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_sort dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1054693
work_keys_str_mv AT shinhanback dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT kimchanghwan dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT hanmincheol dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT hongchaeseon dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT parkseyjoon dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT koomwoongsub dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT kimjinsung dosimetriccomparisonofrobustanglesincarbonionradiationtherapyforprostatecancer