Cargando…

TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment

BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly looking to social media platforms for medical information. AIM: In this study we aimed to evaluate the quality of information regarding premature ejaculation (PE) on TikTok. METHODS: The term “premature ejaculation” was searched on TikTok on a single day in May...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernstein, Ari, Zhu, Michael, Loloi, Justin, Babar, Mustufa, Winokur, Nick, Wysocki, Matthew, Cohen, Seth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfac020
_version_ 1784899551618924544
author Bernstein, Ari
Zhu, Michael
Loloi, Justin
Babar, Mustufa
Winokur, Nick
Wysocki, Matthew
Cohen, Seth
author_facet Bernstein, Ari
Zhu, Michael
Loloi, Justin
Babar, Mustufa
Winokur, Nick
Wysocki, Matthew
Cohen, Seth
author_sort Bernstein, Ari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly looking to social media platforms for medical information. AIM: In this study we aimed to evaluate the quality of information regarding premature ejaculation (PE) on TikTok. METHODS: The term “premature ejaculation” was searched on TikTok on a single day in May 2022. Videos were sorted by 3 reviewers as reliable or unreliable based on the accuracy of video content. Relevant user metrics were collected for each video, including the numbers of likes, shares, and followers, and the video length, source of upload, and speaker type. The quality of information was objectified with 2 validated tools, with mean scores obtained from the 3 reviewers, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and the 5-point modified DISCERN instrument. OUTCOMES: Outcomes were video reliability categorization, video and user metrics as described above, and video quality as quantified by PEMAT and DISCERN scores. RESULTS: Eight videos were categorized as reliable and 32 videos were categorized as unreliable. The mean number of “likes” per video was higher in the reliable than in the unreliable group (1238 vs 126, P < .018). Accounts posting reliable videos had higher mean numbers of followers than those posting unreliable videos (55 050 vs 12 042, P = .025). The majority of unreliable videos (75%) vs reliable videos (12.5%) were posted by self-identified patients or individual users, whereas 62.5% of reliable videos vs versus 6.3% of unreliable videos were posted by individual physicians or physician groups. Few videos overall mentioned PE definition, indications for PE treatment, types of treatment, or value of psychological intervention (12.5%, 15%, 22.5%, and 5.0% of videos, respectively). Video length and number of shares did not differ between groups. Reliable videos had higher PEMAT (73.0 vs 45.1, P < .001) and DISCERN (2.7 vs 0, P < .001.) scores. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There exists a critical need for enhanced quality of medical information on social media platforms in hopes of encouraging patients with impaired sexual function to seek appropriate medical care. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the objective use of validated quality assessment tools and a focus on TikTok as an emerging social media platform. Limitations include large numbers of excluded videos. CONCLUSION: The quality of available information regarding PE on TikTok is low, with a significant percentage of videos on this topic fraught with inaccuracies. Given TikTok’s prominence as a social media platform primarily geared toward younger audiences, we emphasize the need for improvement in the quality of information available regarding PE and its management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99785772023-03-10 TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment Bernstein, Ari Zhu, Michael Loloi, Justin Babar, Mustufa Winokur, Nick Wysocki, Matthew Cohen, Seth Sex Med Education BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly looking to social media platforms for medical information. AIM: In this study we aimed to evaluate the quality of information regarding premature ejaculation (PE) on TikTok. METHODS: The term “premature ejaculation” was searched on TikTok on a single day in May 2022. Videos were sorted by 3 reviewers as reliable or unreliable based on the accuracy of video content. Relevant user metrics were collected for each video, including the numbers of likes, shares, and followers, and the video length, source of upload, and speaker type. The quality of information was objectified with 2 validated tools, with mean scores obtained from the 3 reviewers, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and the 5-point modified DISCERN instrument. OUTCOMES: Outcomes were video reliability categorization, video and user metrics as described above, and video quality as quantified by PEMAT and DISCERN scores. RESULTS: Eight videos were categorized as reliable and 32 videos were categorized as unreliable. The mean number of “likes” per video was higher in the reliable than in the unreliable group (1238 vs 126, P < .018). Accounts posting reliable videos had higher mean numbers of followers than those posting unreliable videos (55 050 vs 12 042, P = .025). The majority of unreliable videos (75%) vs reliable videos (12.5%) were posted by self-identified patients or individual users, whereas 62.5% of reliable videos vs versus 6.3% of unreliable videos were posted by individual physicians or physician groups. Few videos overall mentioned PE definition, indications for PE treatment, types of treatment, or value of psychological intervention (12.5%, 15%, 22.5%, and 5.0% of videos, respectively). Video length and number of shares did not differ between groups. Reliable videos had higher PEMAT (73.0 vs 45.1, P < .001) and DISCERN (2.7 vs 0, P < .001.) scores. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There exists a critical need for enhanced quality of medical information on social media platforms in hopes of encouraging patients with impaired sexual function to seek appropriate medical care. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the objective use of validated quality assessment tools and a focus on TikTok as an emerging social media platform. Limitations include large numbers of excluded videos. CONCLUSION: The quality of available information regarding PE on TikTok is low, with a significant percentage of videos on this topic fraught with inaccuracies. Given TikTok’s prominence as a social media platform primarily geared toward younger audiences, we emphasize the need for improvement in the quality of information available regarding PE and its management. Oxford University Press 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9978577/ /pubmed/36910705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfac020 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society of Sexual Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Education
Bernstein, Ari
Zhu, Michael
Loloi, Justin
Babar, Mustufa
Winokur, Nick
Wysocki, Matthew
Cohen, Seth
TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
title TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
title_full TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
title_fullStr TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
title_full_unstemmed TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
title_short TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
title_sort tiktok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfac020
work_keys_str_mv AT bernsteinari tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment
AT zhumichael tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment
AT loloijustin tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment
AT babarmustufa tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment
AT winokurnick tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment
AT wysockimatthew tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment
AT cohenseth tiktokasasourceofinformationregardingprematureejaculationaqualitativeassessment