Cargando…

Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes in published core outcome sets with the outcomes recommended in corresponding guidance documents from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), matched by health condition. DESIGN: Cross sectional analysis. SETTING: US and Europ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Saldanha, Ian J, Dodd, Susanna, Fish, Rebecca, Gorst, Sarah L, Hall, Deborah A, Jacobsen, Pamela, Kirkham, Jamie J, Trepel, Dominic, Williamson, Paula R
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000233

Ejemplares similares

Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets
por: Saldanha, Ian J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Uptake of core outcome sets by clinical trialists publishing in major medical journals: Protocol
por: Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets
por: Hughes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Core outcome sets in medical research
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of core outcome sets for both research and care
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures?
por: Kirkham, Jamie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets
por: Barnes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using behavioural science to enhance use of core outcome sets in trials: protocol
por: Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A pilot study assessing the similarity between core outcome sets and outcomes included in health technology assessments
por: Cox, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: five years on
por: Williamson, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6(th) annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake
por: Barnes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Awareness and experiences on core outcome set development and use amongst stakeholders from low- and middle- income countries: An online survey
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The effect of military training on the sense of agency and outcome processing
por: Caspar, Emilie A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The Child Guidance Clinic and Other Agencies
por: Ratcliffe, T. A.
Publicado: (1962)

Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer
por: Fish, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Core outcome set for three ophthalmic conditions: a healthcare professional and patient consensus on core outcome sets for amblyopia, ocular motility and strabismus (COSAMS Study)
por: Al-Jabri, Samiya, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures
por: Al Jabri, Samia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study
por: Rowe, Fiona J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correction to: development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures
por: Al Jabri, Samia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Incorporating patients’ perspectives into the initial stages of core outcome set development: a rapid review of qualitative studies of type 2 diabetes
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Departure from treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: a review
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Nonadherence to treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: a review
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance
por: Biggane, Alice M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Ensuring young voices are heard in core outcome set development: international workshops with 70 children and young people
por: Sherratt, Frances C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development of core outcome sets for vision screening and assessment in stroke: a Delphi and consensus study
por: Rowe, Fiona J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ddoeqr1kah0onk201m59s4jd45