Cargando…
Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs
OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical evidence, regulatory background, and cost of antibiotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2016-19. DESIGN: Cohort study of FDA approved drugs. DATA SOURCES: FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted fro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000227 |
_version_ | 1784899585528823808 |
---|---|
author | Mitra-Majumdar, Mayookha Powers, John H Brown, Beatrice L Kesselheim, Aaron S |
author_facet | Mitra-Majumdar, Mayookha Powers, John H Brown, Beatrice L Kesselheim, Aaron S |
author_sort | Mitra-Majumdar, Mayookha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical evidence, regulatory background, and cost of antibiotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2016-19. DESIGN: Cohort study of FDA approved drugs. DATA SOURCES: FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted from IBM Micromedex Red Book. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Antibiotics approved by the FDA from October 2016 to December 2019 were identified, and key features of their clinical development were extracted from publicly available FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted from IBM Micromedex Red Book to evaluate the cost of treatment against comparators. RESULTS: 15 new antibiotics received at least one special regulatory designation and were supported by a median of two pivotal trials. More than half of the pivotal trials used an active control non-inferiority design. All drugs were approved based on surrogate outcome measures. 52 postmarketing requirements and commitments were included across the cohort (median 3 for each drug). From January 2021, 27 postmarketing requirements and commitments were listed as pending, seven as ongoing, three as delayed, one as submitted, eight as released, and four as fulfilled. The most expensive new antibiotic was pretomanid at $36 399 (£29 618; €34 582) for a course of treatment, and the least expensive was rifamycin ($176). Cost ratios between study drugs and comparators ranged from 0.48 to 134. CONCLUSIONS: New antibiotics have been approved by the FDA in recent years mostly based on fewer, smaller, and non-inferiority pivotal trials that often used surrogate outcome measures but were commonly more costly. Efforts to incentivise the development of antibiotics should balance growing the antibiotic development pipeline with ensuring that clinical trials provide clinically relevant evidence of effectiveness in showing added benefits for the patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9978751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99787512023-03-16 Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs Mitra-Majumdar, Mayookha Powers, John H Brown, Beatrice L Kesselheim, Aaron S BMJ Med Research OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical evidence, regulatory background, and cost of antibiotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2016-19. DESIGN: Cohort study of FDA approved drugs. DATA SOURCES: FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted from IBM Micromedex Red Book. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Antibiotics approved by the FDA from October 2016 to December 2019 were identified, and key features of their clinical development were extracted from publicly available FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted from IBM Micromedex Red Book to evaluate the cost of treatment against comparators. RESULTS: 15 new antibiotics received at least one special regulatory designation and were supported by a median of two pivotal trials. More than half of the pivotal trials used an active control non-inferiority design. All drugs were approved based on surrogate outcome measures. 52 postmarketing requirements and commitments were included across the cohort (median 3 for each drug). From January 2021, 27 postmarketing requirements and commitments were listed as pending, seven as ongoing, three as delayed, one as submitted, eight as released, and four as fulfilled. The most expensive new antibiotic was pretomanid at $36 399 (£29 618; €34 582) for a course of treatment, and the least expensive was rifamycin ($176). Cost ratios between study drugs and comparators ranged from 0.48 to 134. CONCLUSIONS: New antibiotics have been approved by the FDA in recent years mostly based on fewer, smaller, and non-inferiority pivotal trials that often used surrogate outcome measures but were commonly more costly. Efforts to incentivise the development of antibiotics should balance growing the antibiotic development pipeline with ensuring that clinical trials provide clinically relevant evidence of effectiveness in showing added benefits for the patient. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9978751/ /pubmed/36936591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000227 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Mitra-Majumdar, Mayookha Powers, John H Brown, Beatrice L Kesselheim, Aaron S Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs |
title | Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs |
title_full | Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs |
title_fullStr | Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs |
title_short | Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs |
title_sort | evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of fda approved drugs |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitramajumdarmayookha evidenceattimeofregulatoryapprovalandcostofnewantibioticsin201619cohortstudyoffdaapproveddrugs AT powersjohnh evidenceattimeofregulatoryapprovalandcostofnewantibioticsin201619cohortstudyoffdaapproveddrugs AT brownbeatricel evidenceattimeofregulatoryapprovalandcostofnewantibioticsin201619cohortstudyoffdaapproveddrugs AT kesselheimaarons evidenceattimeofregulatoryapprovalandcostofnewantibioticsin201619cohortstudyoffdaapproveddrugs |