Cargando…

Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme

INTRODUCTION: The most successful programme for secondary fracture prevention is the FLS (fracture liaison service) model. Our orthopaedic department carried out a prospective randomised study to measure the effectiveness of a 4-step intervention programme. The findings in this study reveal importan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zinger, Gershon, Sylvetsky, Noa, Levy, Yedin, Steinberg, Kobi, Bregman, Alexander, Yudkevich, Genady, Peyser, Amos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000211027476
_version_ 1784899612277997568
author Zinger, Gershon
Sylvetsky, Noa
Levy, Yedin
Steinberg, Kobi
Bregman, Alexander
Yudkevich, Genady
Peyser, Amos
author_facet Zinger, Gershon
Sylvetsky, Noa
Levy, Yedin
Steinberg, Kobi
Bregman, Alexander
Yudkevich, Genady
Peyser, Amos
author_sort Zinger, Gershon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The most successful programme for secondary fracture prevention is the FLS (fracture liaison service) model. Our orthopaedic department carried out a prospective randomised study to measure the effectiveness of a 4-step intervention programme. The findings in this study reveal important additional clinical benefits to having an orthopaedic-based FLS programme and evaluates the usefulness of fracture risk tools. METHODS: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate patients with a fragility fracture of the hip. There were 2 groups, intervention and control (each 100 patients). Of these, 20 were either removed from the study or dropped out, leaving 180 for analysis. In addition to routine preoperative blood tests, albumin and thyroid function levels were obtained and PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels when indicated. The intervention group (83 patients) had a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan performed and fracture risk (FRAX) was calculated. RESULTS: 12 patients (6.7%) had blood results which showed a potentially treatable cause for osteoporosis and 36 (20%) had blood results that changed their medical care. FRAX scores (180 patients) showed that the major osteoporotic fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in only 49%. The hip fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in 83%. DEXA scores (65 patients) showed osteoporosis in only 46% of hips and in only 26% of spines. An abnormal FRAX score or DEXA scan would have predicted a fragility fracture 93% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to reducing secondary fractures, FLS programmes can provide fundamental benefits to the health of the patient. The intervention programme in this study identified patients with underlying treatable causes, correctable clinical conditions and patients with an unusually low bone density. When used together, FRAX and DEXA are more sensitive predictors for hip fracture risk than either are individually. TRIAL REGISTRY: 201497CTIL (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02239523)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9978860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99788602023-03-03 Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme Zinger, Gershon Sylvetsky, Noa Levy, Yedin Steinberg, Kobi Bregman, Alexander Yudkevich, Genady Peyser, Amos Hip Int Original Research Articles INTRODUCTION: The most successful programme for secondary fracture prevention is the FLS (fracture liaison service) model. Our orthopaedic department carried out a prospective randomised study to measure the effectiveness of a 4-step intervention programme. The findings in this study reveal important additional clinical benefits to having an orthopaedic-based FLS programme and evaluates the usefulness of fracture risk tools. METHODS: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate patients with a fragility fracture of the hip. There were 2 groups, intervention and control (each 100 patients). Of these, 20 were either removed from the study or dropped out, leaving 180 for analysis. In addition to routine preoperative blood tests, albumin and thyroid function levels were obtained and PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels when indicated. The intervention group (83 patients) had a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan performed and fracture risk (FRAX) was calculated. RESULTS: 12 patients (6.7%) had blood results which showed a potentially treatable cause for osteoporosis and 36 (20%) had blood results that changed their medical care. FRAX scores (180 patients) showed that the major osteoporotic fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in only 49%. The hip fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in 83%. DEXA scores (65 patients) showed osteoporosis in only 46% of hips and in only 26% of spines. An abnormal FRAX score or DEXA scan would have predicted a fragility fracture 93% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to reducing secondary fractures, FLS programmes can provide fundamental benefits to the health of the patient. The intervention programme in this study identified patients with underlying treatable causes, correctable clinical conditions and patients with an unusually low bone density. When used together, FRAX and DEXA are more sensitive predictors for hip fracture risk than either are individually. TRIAL REGISTRY: 201497CTIL (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02239523) SAGE Publications 2021-06-27 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9978860/ /pubmed/34180292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000211027476 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Zinger, Gershon
Sylvetsky, Noa
Levy, Yedin
Steinberg, Kobi
Bregman, Alexander
Yudkevich, Genady
Peyser, Amos
Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
title Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
title_full Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
title_fullStr Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
title_full_unstemmed Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
title_short Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
title_sort early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000211027476
work_keys_str_mv AT zingergershon earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme
AT sylvetskynoa earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme
AT levyyedin earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme
AT steinbergkobi earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme
AT bregmanalexander earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme
AT yudkevichgenady earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme
AT peyseramos earlybenefitsofasecondaryfracturepreventionprogramme