Cargando…
Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis
Background: Although with the application of etanercept biosimilars in the field of rheumatoid arthritis, the evidences of their efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity are still limited. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1089272 |
_version_ | 1784899651538780160 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Rui Yuan, Tao Wang, Hui Zhao, Jianglin Shi, Liya Li, Quankai Zhu, Chunmei Su, Na Zhang, Shengzhao |
author_facet | Hu, Rui Yuan, Tao Wang, Hui Zhao, Jianglin Shi, Liya Li, Quankai Zhu, Chunmei Su, Na Zhang, Shengzhao |
author_sort | Hu, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Although with the application of etanercept biosimilars in the field of rheumatoid arthritis, the evidences of their efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity are still limited. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars for treating active rheumatoid arthritis compared to reference biologics (Enbrel(®)). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials of etanercept biosimilars treated in adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from their earliest records to 15 August 2022. The outcomes included ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rate at different time points from FAS or PPS, adverse events, and proportion of patients developed anti-drug antibodies. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool, and the certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Six RCTs with 2432 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Etanercept biosimilars showed more benefits in ACR50 at 24 weeks from PPS [5 RCTs, OR = 1.22 (1.01, 1.47), p = 0.04, I ( 2 ) = 49%, high certainty], ACR50 at 1 year from PPS [3 RCTs, OR = 1.43 (1.10, 1.86), p < 0.01, I ( 2 ) = 0%, high certainty] or FAS [2 RCTs, OR = 1.36 (1.04, 1.78), p = 0.03, I ( 2 ) = 0%, high certainty], and ACR70 at 1 year from PPS [3 RCTs, OR = 1.32 (1.01, 1.71), p = 0.04, I ( 2 ) = 0%, high certainty]. In terms of other outcomes about efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, the results showed that there was no significant difference between etanercept biosimilars and reference biologics, and the certainty of evidences ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: Etanercept biosimilars showed more benefits in ACR50 response rate at 1 year than reference biologics (Enbrel(®)), other outcomes for clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars were comparable with originator in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022358709 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9979087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99790872023-03-03 Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis Hu, Rui Yuan, Tao Wang, Hui Zhao, Jianglin Shi, Liya Li, Quankai Zhu, Chunmei Su, Na Zhang, Shengzhao Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Although with the application of etanercept biosimilars in the field of rheumatoid arthritis, the evidences of their efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity are still limited. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars for treating active rheumatoid arthritis compared to reference biologics (Enbrel(®)). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials of etanercept biosimilars treated in adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from their earliest records to 15 August 2022. The outcomes included ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rate at different time points from FAS or PPS, adverse events, and proportion of patients developed anti-drug antibodies. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool, and the certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Six RCTs with 2432 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Etanercept biosimilars showed more benefits in ACR50 at 24 weeks from PPS [5 RCTs, OR = 1.22 (1.01, 1.47), p = 0.04, I ( 2 ) = 49%, high certainty], ACR50 at 1 year from PPS [3 RCTs, OR = 1.43 (1.10, 1.86), p < 0.01, I ( 2 ) = 0%, high certainty] or FAS [2 RCTs, OR = 1.36 (1.04, 1.78), p = 0.03, I ( 2 ) = 0%, high certainty], and ACR70 at 1 year from PPS [3 RCTs, OR = 1.32 (1.01, 1.71), p = 0.04, I ( 2 ) = 0%, high certainty]. In terms of other outcomes about efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, the results showed that there was no significant difference between etanercept biosimilars and reference biologics, and the certainty of evidences ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: Etanercept biosimilars showed more benefits in ACR50 response rate at 1 year than reference biologics (Enbrel(®)), other outcomes for clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars were comparable with originator in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022358709 Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9979087/ /pubmed/36874005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1089272 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hu, Yuan, Wang, Zhao, Shi, Li, Zhu, Su and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Hu, Rui Yuan, Tao Wang, Hui Zhao, Jianglin Shi, Liya Li, Quankai Zhu, Chunmei Su, Na Zhang, Shengzhao Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1089272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurui efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT yuantao efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT wanghui efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT zhaojianglin efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT shiliya efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT liquankai efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT zhuchunmei efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT suna efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis AT zhangshengzhao efficacysafetyandimmunogenicityofetanerceptbiosimilarsversusreferencebiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisametaanalysis |