Cargando…
A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
Clinical trial regulations for new drugs in India released a gazette notification for obtaining audiovisual (AV) consent from all trial participants in November 2013. The reports of AV recordings of the studies from October 2013 to February 2017 submitted to the institutional ethics committee were a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874722 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34433 |
_version_ | 1784899653573017600 |
---|---|
author | Shetty, Yashashri C Tripathi, Raakhi Marathe, Padmaja A Jalgaonkar, Sharmila Gajbhiye, Snehalata Katkar, Janhavi |
author_facet | Shetty, Yashashri C Tripathi, Raakhi Marathe, Padmaja A Jalgaonkar, Sharmila Gajbhiye, Snehalata Katkar, Janhavi |
author_sort | Shetty, Yashashri C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trial regulations for new drugs in India released a gazette notification for obtaining audiovisual (AV) consent from all trial participants in November 2013. The reports of AV recordings of the studies from October 2013 to February 2017 submitted to the institutional ethics committee were analyzed in view of the Indian regulations on AV consenting. The reports of AV recording were checked: number of AV consents for each project, adequacy of AV recording, number of persons in the video, informed consent document elements (ICD) covered as per Schedule Y, confirmation of understanding by the participant, the time taken to complete the procedure, maintenance of confidentiality, and whether reconsent was taken. Seven studies of AV consent were monitored. Eighty-five (85) AV-consented and filled checklists were evaluated. The AV recording was not clear in 31/85, ICD elements were missing in 49/85 consents, time taken to complete the procedure was 20.03 ± 10.83 with the number of pages being 14.24 ± 7.52 (R= 0.29 p<0.041). In 19/85 consents, privacy was not maintained and on 22 occasions, reconsent were taken. There were deficits found in the AV consent process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9979097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99790972023-03-03 A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective Shetty, Yashashri C Tripathi, Raakhi Marathe, Padmaja A Jalgaonkar, Sharmila Gajbhiye, Snehalata Katkar, Janhavi Cureus Other Clinical trial regulations for new drugs in India released a gazette notification for obtaining audiovisual (AV) consent from all trial participants in November 2013. The reports of AV recordings of the studies from October 2013 to February 2017 submitted to the institutional ethics committee were analyzed in view of the Indian regulations on AV consenting. The reports of AV recording were checked: number of AV consents for each project, adequacy of AV recording, number of persons in the video, informed consent document elements (ICD) covered as per Schedule Y, confirmation of understanding by the participant, the time taken to complete the procedure, maintenance of confidentiality, and whether reconsent was taken. Seven studies of AV consent were monitored. Eighty-five (85) AV-consented and filled checklists were evaluated. The AV recording was not clear in 31/85, ICD elements were missing in 49/85 consents, time taken to complete the procedure was 20.03 ± 10.83 with the number of pages being 14.24 ± 7.52 (R= 0.29 p<0.041). In 19/85 consents, privacy was not maintained and on 22 occasions, reconsent were taken. There were deficits found in the AV consent process. Cureus 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9979097/ /pubmed/36874722 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34433 Text en Copyright © 2023, Shetty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Other Shetty, Yashashri C Tripathi, Raakhi Marathe, Padmaja A Jalgaonkar, Sharmila Gajbhiye, Snehalata Katkar, Janhavi A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective |
title | A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective |
title_full | A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective |
title_short | A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective |
title_sort | retrospective study of ethics committee monitoring checklists of the audiovisual consent process: an ethical perspective |
topic | Other |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874722 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shettyyashashric aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT tripathiraakhi aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT marathepadmajaa aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT jalgaonkarsharmila aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT gajbhiyesnehalata aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT katkarjanhavi aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT shettyyashashric retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT tripathiraakhi retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT marathepadmajaa retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT jalgaonkarsharmila retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT gajbhiyesnehalata retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective AT katkarjanhavi retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective |