Cargando…

A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective

Clinical trial regulations for new drugs in India released a gazette notification for obtaining audiovisual (AV) consent from all trial participants in November 2013. The reports of AV recordings of the studies from October 2013 to February 2017 submitted to the institutional ethics committee were a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Yashashri C, Tripathi, Raakhi, Marathe, Padmaja A, Jalgaonkar, Sharmila, Gajbhiye, Snehalata, Katkar, Janhavi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874722
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34433
_version_ 1784899653573017600
author Shetty, Yashashri C
Tripathi, Raakhi
Marathe, Padmaja A
Jalgaonkar, Sharmila
Gajbhiye, Snehalata
Katkar, Janhavi
author_facet Shetty, Yashashri C
Tripathi, Raakhi
Marathe, Padmaja A
Jalgaonkar, Sharmila
Gajbhiye, Snehalata
Katkar, Janhavi
author_sort Shetty, Yashashri C
collection PubMed
description Clinical trial regulations for new drugs in India released a gazette notification for obtaining audiovisual (AV) consent from all trial participants in November 2013. The reports of AV recordings of the studies from October 2013 to February 2017 submitted to the institutional ethics committee were analyzed in view of the Indian regulations on AV consenting. The reports of AV recording were checked: number of AV consents for each project, adequacy of AV recording, number of persons in the video, informed consent document elements (ICD) covered as per Schedule Y, confirmation of understanding by the participant, the time taken to complete the procedure, maintenance of confidentiality, and whether reconsent was taken. Seven studies of AV consent were monitored. Eighty-five (85) AV-consented and filled checklists were evaluated. The AV recording was not clear in 31/85, ICD elements were missing in 49/85 consents, time taken to complete the procedure was 20.03 ± 10.83 with the number of pages being 14.24 ± 7.52 (R= 0.29 p<0.041). In 19/85 consents, privacy was not maintained and on 22 occasions, reconsent were taken. There were deficits found in the AV consent process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9979097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99790972023-03-03 A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective Shetty, Yashashri C Tripathi, Raakhi Marathe, Padmaja A Jalgaonkar, Sharmila Gajbhiye, Snehalata Katkar, Janhavi Cureus Other Clinical trial regulations for new drugs in India released a gazette notification for obtaining audiovisual (AV) consent from all trial participants in November 2013. The reports of AV recordings of the studies from October 2013 to February 2017 submitted to the institutional ethics committee were analyzed in view of the Indian regulations on AV consenting. The reports of AV recording were checked: number of AV consents for each project, adequacy of AV recording, number of persons in the video, informed consent document elements (ICD) covered as per Schedule Y, confirmation of understanding by the participant, the time taken to complete the procedure, maintenance of confidentiality, and whether reconsent was taken. Seven studies of AV consent were monitored. Eighty-five (85) AV-consented and filled checklists were evaluated. The AV recording was not clear in 31/85, ICD elements were missing in 49/85 consents, time taken to complete the procedure was 20.03 ± 10.83 with the number of pages being 14.24 ± 7.52 (R= 0.29 p<0.041). In 19/85 consents, privacy was not maintained and on 22 occasions, reconsent were taken. There were deficits found in the AV consent process. Cureus 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9979097/ /pubmed/36874722 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34433 Text en Copyright © 2023, Shetty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Other
Shetty, Yashashri C
Tripathi, Raakhi
Marathe, Padmaja A
Jalgaonkar, Sharmila
Gajbhiye, Snehalata
Katkar, Janhavi
A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
title A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
title_full A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
title_fullStr A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
title_short A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
title_sort retrospective study of ethics committee monitoring checklists of the audiovisual consent process: an ethical perspective
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874722
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34433
work_keys_str_mv AT shettyyashashric aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT tripathiraakhi aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT marathepadmajaa aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT jalgaonkarsharmila aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT gajbhiyesnehalata aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT katkarjanhavi aretrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT shettyyashashric retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT tripathiraakhi retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT marathepadmajaa retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT jalgaonkarsharmila retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT gajbhiyesnehalata retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective
AT katkarjanhavi retrospectivestudyofethicscommitteemonitoringchecklistsoftheaudiovisualconsentprocessanethicalperspective