Robotic revision surgery after failed Nissen anti-reflux surgery: a single center experience and a literature review

BACKGROUND: The gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) worldwide prevalence is increasing maybe due to population aging and the obesity epidemic. Nissen fundoplication is the most common surgical procedure for GERD with a failure rate of approximately 20% which might require a redo surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic redo procedures after anti-reflux surgery failure including a narrative review. METHODS: We reviewed our 15-year experience from 2005 to 2020 including 317 procedures, 306 for primary, and 11 for revisional surgery. RESULTS: Patients included in the redo series underwent primary Nissen fundoplication with a mean age of 57.6 years (range, 43–71). All procedures were minimally invasive and no conversion to open surgery was registered. The meshes were used in five (45.45%) patients. The mean operative time was 147 min (range, 110–225) and the mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range, 2–7). At a mean follow-up of 78 months (range, 18–192), one patient suffered for persistent dysphagia and one for delayed gastric emptying. We had two (18.19%) Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa complications, consisting of postoperative pneumothoraxes treated with chest drainage. CONCLUSION: Redo anti-reflux surgery is indicated in selected patients and the robotic approach is safe when it is performed in specialized centers, considering its surgical technical difficulty.