Cargando…

Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks

BACKGROUND: Thermophilic composting is a promising method of sanitizing pathogens in manure and a source of agriculturally important thermostable enzymes and microorganisms from organic wastes. Despite the extensive studies on compost prokaryotes, shifts in microbial profiles under the influence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matheri, Felix, Kambura, Anne Kelly, Mwangi, Maina, Ongeso, Nehemiah, Karanja, Edward, Adamtey, Noah, Mwangi, Elias Kihara, Mwangi, Edwin, Tanga, Chrysantus, Musyoka, Martha Wangu, Runo, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02798-w
_version_ 1784899751313932288
author Matheri, Felix
Kambura, Anne Kelly
Mwangi, Maina
Ongeso, Nehemiah
Karanja, Edward
Adamtey, Noah
Mwangi, Elias Kihara
Mwangi, Edwin
Tanga, Chrysantus
Musyoka, Martha Wangu
Runo, Steven
author_facet Matheri, Felix
Kambura, Anne Kelly
Mwangi, Maina
Ongeso, Nehemiah
Karanja, Edward
Adamtey, Noah
Mwangi, Elias Kihara
Mwangi, Edwin
Tanga, Chrysantus
Musyoka, Martha Wangu
Runo, Steven
author_sort Matheri, Felix
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thermophilic composting is a promising method of sanitizing pathogens in manure and a source of agriculturally important thermostable enzymes and microorganisms from organic wastes. Despite the extensive studies on compost prokaryotes, shifts in microbial profiles under the influence of various green materials and composting days are still not well understood, considering the complexity of the green material sources. Here, the effect of regimens of green composting material on the diversity, abundance, and metabolic capacity of prokaryotic communities in a thermophilic compost environment was examined. METHODS: Total community 16S rRNA was recovered from triplicate compost samples of Lantana-based, Tithonia-based, Grass-based, and mixed (Lantana + Tithonia + Grass)- based at 21, 42, 63, and 84 days of composting. The 16S rRNA was sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. Bioinformatics analysis was done using Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm version 2 (DADA2) R version 4.1 and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States version 2 (PICRUSt2) pipelines for community structure and metabolic profiles, respectively. In DADA2, prokaryotic classification was done using the Refseq-ribosomal database project (RDP) and SILVA version 138 databases. RESULTS: Our results showed apparent differences in prokaryotic community structure for total diversity and abundance within the four compost regimens and composting days. The study showed that the most prevalent phyla during composting included Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Chloroflexi, and Proteobacteria. Additionally, there were differences in the overall diversity of metabolic pathways but no significant differences among the various compost treatments on major metabolic pathways like carbohydrate biosynthesis, carbohydrate degradation, and nitrogen biosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Various sources of green material affect the succession of compost nutrients and prokaryotic communities. The similarity of amounts of nutrients, such as total Nitrogen, at the end of the composting process, despite differences in feedstock material, indicates a significant influence of composting days on the stability of nutrients during composting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-023-02798-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9979578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99795782023-03-03 Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks Matheri, Felix Kambura, Anne Kelly Mwangi, Maina Ongeso, Nehemiah Karanja, Edward Adamtey, Noah Mwangi, Elias Kihara Mwangi, Edwin Tanga, Chrysantus Musyoka, Martha Wangu Runo, Steven BMC Microbiol Research BACKGROUND: Thermophilic composting is a promising method of sanitizing pathogens in manure and a source of agriculturally important thermostable enzymes and microorganisms from organic wastes. Despite the extensive studies on compost prokaryotes, shifts in microbial profiles under the influence of various green materials and composting days are still not well understood, considering the complexity of the green material sources. Here, the effect of regimens of green composting material on the diversity, abundance, and metabolic capacity of prokaryotic communities in a thermophilic compost environment was examined. METHODS: Total community 16S rRNA was recovered from triplicate compost samples of Lantana-based, Tithonia-based, Grass-based, and mixed (Lantana + Tithonia + Grass)- based at 21, 42, 63, and 84 days of composting. The 16S rRNA was sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. Bioinformatics analysis was done using Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm version 2 (DADA2) R version 4.1 and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States version 2 (PICRUSt2) pipelines for community structure and metabolic profiles, respectively. In DADA2, prokaryotic classification was done using the Refseq-ribosomal database project (RDP) and SILVA version 138 databases. RESULTS: Our results showed apparent differences in prokaryotic community structure for total diversity and abundance within the four compost regimens and composting days. The study showed that the most prevalent phyla during composting included Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Chloroflexi, and Proteobacteria. Additionally, there were differences in the overall diversity of metabolic pathways but no significant differences among the various compost treatments on major metabolic pathways like carbohydrate biosynthesis, carbohydrate degradation, and nitrogen biosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Various sources of green material affect the succession of compost nutrients and prokaryotic communities. The similarity of amounts of nutrients, such as total Nitrogen, at the end of the composting process, despite differences in feedstock material, indicates a significant influence of composting days on the stability of nutrients during composting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-023-02798-w. BioMed Central 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9979578/ /pubmed/36859170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02798-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Matheri, Felix
Kambura, Anne Kelly
Mwangi, Maina
Ongeso, Nehemiah
Karanja, Edward
Adamtey, Noah
Mwangi, Elias Kihara
Mwangi, Edwin
Tanga, Chrysantus
Musyoka, Martha Wangu
Runo, Steven
Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
title Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
title_full Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
title_fullStr Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
title_full_unstemmed Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
title_short Composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
title_sort composition, structure, and functional shifts of prokaryotic communities in response to co-composting of various nitrogenous green feedstocks
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02798-w
work_keys_str_mv AT matherifelix compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT kamburaannekelly compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT mwangimaina compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT ongesonehemiah compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT karanjaedward compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT adamteynoah compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT mwangieliaskihara compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT mwangiedwin compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT tangachrysantus compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT musyokamarthawangu compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks
AT runosteven compositionstructureandfunctionalshiftsofprokaryoticcommunitiesinresponsetococompostingofvariousnitrogenousgreenfeedstocks