Cargando…

Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track

Background: A quality assurance system is vital when using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to ensure safe and effective ultrasound use. There are many barriers to implementing a quality assurance system including need for costly software, faculty time, and extra work to log images. Methods: With mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Steven, Fleshner, Michelle, Flanagan, Collin, Robertson, Thomas, Fujita, Ayako Wendy, Bhamidipati, Divya, Sindi, Abdulrahman, Purushothaman, Raghunandan, Bui, Thuy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896436
http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v5i2.14433
_version_ 1784899817040773120
author Fox, Steven
Fleshner, Michelle
Flanagan, Collin
Robertson, Thomas
Fujita, Ayako Wendy
Bhamidipati, Divya
Sindi, Abdulrahman
Purushothaman, Raghunandan
Bui, Thuy
author_facet Fox, Steven
Fleshner, Michelle
Flanagan, Collin
Robertson, Thomas
Fujita, Ayako Wendy
Bhamidipati, Divya
Sindi, Abdulrahman
Purushothaman, Raghunandan
Bui, Thuy
author_sort Fox, Steven
collection PubMed
description Background: A quality assurance system is vital when using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to ensure safe and effective ultrasound use. There are many barriers to implementing a quality assurance system including need for costly software, faculty time, and extra work to log images. Methods: With minimal funding or protected faculty time, we successfully developed an effective remote quality assurance system between residents rotating internationally and faculty in the US. Results: 270 total exams were logged using this system (41 per resident over a 7 week period). Over the course of the implementation period, a significant increase was seen in average image quality (p = 0.030) and percent agreement with reviewer (p = 0.021). No significant increase was seen for percent images with quality rating 5/5 (p = 0.068) or for studies per resident per week (p = 0.30). Discussion/Conclusions: A quality assurance system for remote review and feedback of POCUS exams was successfully developed with limited available funding, using consumer-level software and an educational collaboration. Residents used the system regularly and demonstrated improvement in reviewer-rated image acquisition and interpretation skills. A similar system can be applied for physicians in any geographic area looking to learn POCUS, in partnership with local or international POCUS mentors. We detail a step-by-step approach, challenges encountered, and lessons learned, to help guide others seeking to implement similar programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9979927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99799272023-03-08 Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track Fox, Steven Fleshner, Michelle Flanagan, Collin Robertson, Thomas Fujita, Ayako Wendy Bhamidipati, Divya Sindi, Abdulrahman Purushothaman, Raghunandan Bui, Thuy POCUS J Medicine Background: A quality assurance system is vital when using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to ensure safe and effective ultrasound use. There are many barriers to implementing a quality assurance system including need for costly software, faculty time, and extra work to log images. Methods: With minimal funding or protected faculty time, we successfully developed an effective remote quality assurance system between residents rotating internationally and faculty in the US. Results: 270 total exams were logged using this system (41 per resident over a 7 week period). Over the course of the implementation period, a significant increase was seen in average image quality (p = 0.030) and percent agreement with reviewer (p = 0.021). No significant increase was seen for percent images with quality rating 5/5 (p = 0.068) or for studies per resident per week (p = 0.30). Discussion/Conclusions: A quality assurance system for remote review and feedback of POCUS exams was successfully developed with limited available funding, using consumer-level software and an educational collaboration. Residents used the system regularly and demonstrated improvement in reviewer-rated image acquisition and interpretation skills. A similar system can be applied for physicians in any geographic area looking to learn POCUS, in partnership with local or international POCUS mentors. We detail a step-by-step approach, challenges encountered, and lessons learned, to help guide others seeking to implement similar programs. 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9979927/ /pubmed/36896436 http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v5i2.14433 Text en Author(s) retain the copyright for their work. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medicine
Fox, Steven
Fleshner, Michelle
Flanagan, Collin
Robertson, Thomas
Fujita, Ayako Wendy
Bhamidipati, Divya
Sindi, Abdulrahman
Purushothaman, Raghunandan
Bui, Thuy
Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track
title Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track
title_full Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track
title_fullStr Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track
title_full_unstemmed Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track
title_short Developing and Evaluating a Remote Quality Assurance System for Point-of-Care Ultrasound for an Internal Medicine Residency Global Health Track
title_sort developing and evaluating a remote quality assurance system for point-of-care ultrasound for an internal medicine residency global health track
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896436
http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v5i2.14433
work_keys_str_mv AT foxsteven developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT fleshnermichelle developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT flanagancollin developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT robertsonthomas developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT fujitaayakowendy developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT bhamidipatidivya developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT sindiabdulrahman developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT purushothamanraghunandan developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack
AT buithuy developingandevaluatingaremotequalityassurancesystemforpointofcareultrasoundforaninternalmedicineresidencyglobalhealthtrack