Cargando…

Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Actigraphy is commonly used to record free living physical activity in both typically and atypically developing children. While the accuracy and reliability of actigraphy have been explored extensively, research regarding young people’s opinion towards these devices is scarce. This rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Anna Charlotte, Telesia, Laurence, Wickersham, Alice, Epstein, Sophie, Matcham, Faith, Sonuga-Barke, Edmund, Downs, Johnny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070597
_version_ 1784899888613425152
author Morris, Anna Charlotte
Telesia, Laurence
Wickersham, Alice
Epstein, Sophie
Matcham, Faith
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
Downs, Johnny
author_facet Morris, Anna Charlotte
Telesia, Laurence
Wickersham, Alice
Epstein, Sophie
Matcham, Faith
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
Downs, Johnny
author_sort Morris, Anna Charlotte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Actigraphy is commonly used to record free living physical activity in both typically and atypically developing children. While the accuracy and reliability of actigraphy have been explored extensively, research regarding young people’s opinion towards these devices is scarce. This review aims to identify and synthesise evidence relating to the acceptability of actigraphic devices in 5–11 year olds. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Database searches will be applied to Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo and Social Policy and Practice through the OVID interface; and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), British Education Index and CINAHL through the EBSCO interface from January 2018 until February 2023. Supplementary forward and backward citation and grey literature database searches, including Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and PsycEXTRA will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies, excluding review articles and meta-analyses, will be eligible, without date restrictions. Article screening and data extraction will be undertaken by two review authors and disagreements will be deferred to a third reviewer. The primary outcome, actigraphic acceptability, will derive from the narrative synthesis of the main themes identified from included qualitative literature and pooled descriptive statistics relating to acceptability identified from quantitative literature. Subgroup analyses will determine if acceptability changes as a function of the key participant and actigraphic device factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as it uses data from previously published literature. The results will be presented in a manuscript and published in a peer review journal and will be considered alongside a separate stream of codesign research to inform the development of a novel child-worn actigraphic device. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021232466.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9980313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99803132023-03-03 Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Morris, Anna Charlotte Telesia, Laurence Wickersham, Alice Epstein, Sophie Matcham, Faith Sonuga-Barke, Edmund Downs, Johnny BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Actigraphy is commonly used to record free living physical activity in both typically and atypically developing children. While the accuracy and reliability of actigraphy have been explored extensively, research regarding young people’s opinion towards these devices is scarce. This review aims to identify and synthesise evidence relating to the acceptability of actigraphic devices in 5–11 year olds. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Database searches will be applied to Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo and Social Policy and Practice through the OVID interface; and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), British Education Index and CINAHL through the EBSCO interface from January 2018 until February 2023. Supplementary forward and backward citation and grey literature database searches, including Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and PsycEXTRA will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies, excluding review articles and meta-analyses, will be eligible, without date restrictions. Article screening and data extraction will be undertaken by two review authors and disagreements will be deferred to a third reviewer. The primary outcome, actigraphic acceptability, will derive from the narrative synthesis of the main themes identified from included qualitative literature and pooled descriptive statistics relating to acceptability identified from quantitative literature. Subgroup analyses will determine if acceptability changes as a function of the key participant and actigraphic device factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as it uses data from previously published literature. The results will be presented in a manuscript and published in a peer review journal and will be considered alongside a separate stream of codesign research to inform the development of a novel child-worn actigraphic device. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021232466. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9980313/ /pubmed/36858478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070597 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Morris, Anna Charlotte
Telesia, Laurence
Wickersham, Alice
Epstein, Sophie
Matcham, Faith
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
Downs, Johnny
Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070597
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisannacharlotte examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT telesialaurence examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wickershamalice examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT epsteinsophie examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matchamfaith examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sonugabarkeedmund examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT downsjohnny examiningtheacceptabilityofactigraphicdevicesinchildrenusingqualitativeandquantitativeapproachesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis