Cargando…
Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
INTRODUCTION: Administration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065392 |
_version_ | 1784899889643126784 |
---|---|
author | Lindén, Anja Fisher, Jane Lilja, Gisela Olsen, Markus Harboe Sjövall, Fredrik Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Samuelsson, Line Oras, Jonatan Linder, Adam Unden, Johan Kander, T Lipcsey, Miklós Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus C Bentzer, Peter |
author_facet | Lindén, Anja Fisher, Jane Lilja, Gisela Olsen, Markus Harboe Sjövall, Fredrik Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Samuelsson, Line Oras, Jonatan Linder, Adam Unden, Johan Kander, T Lipcsey, Miklós Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus C Bentzer, Peter |
author_sort | Lindén, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Administration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the hypothesis that a protocol targeting this source of fluids can reduce fluid administration compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design will be a multicentre, randomised, feasibility trial. Adult patients admitted to ICUs with septic shock will be randomised within 12 hours of admission to receive non-resuscitation fluids either according to a restrictive protocol or to receive usual care. The healthcare providers involved in the care of participants will not be blinded. The participants, outcome assessors at the 6-month follow-up and statisticians will be blinded. Primary outcome will be litres of fluids administered within 3 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be proportion of randomised participants with outcome data on all-cause mortality; days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 90 days of inclusion; any acute kidney injury and ischaemic events in the ICU (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia); proportion of surviving randomised patients who were assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment; proportion of all eligible patients who were randomised and proportion of participants experiencing at least one protocol violation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained in Sweden. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05249088. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9980317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99803172023-03-03 Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial Lindén, Anja Fisher, Jane Lilja, Gisela Olsen, Markus Harboe Sjövall, Fredrik Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Samuelsson, Line Oras, Jonatan Linder, Adam Unden, Johan Kander, T Lipcsey, Miklós Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus C Bentzer, Peter BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Administration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the hypothesis that a protocol targeting this source of fluids can reduce fluid administration compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design will be a multicentre, randomised, feasibility trial. Adult patients admitted to ICUs with septic shock will be randomised within 12 hours of admission to receive non-resuscitation fluids either according to a restrictive protocol or to receive usual care. The healthcare providers involved in the care of participants will not be blinded. The participants, outcome assessors at the 6-month follow-up and statisticians will be blinded. Primary outcome will be litres of fluids administered within 3 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be proportion of randomised participants with outcome data on all-cause mortality; days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 90 days of inclusion; any acute kidney injury and ischaemic events in the ICU (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia); proportion of surviving randomised patients who were assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment; proportion of all eligible patients who were randomised and proportion of participants experiencing at least one protocol violation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained in Sweden. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05249088. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9980317/ /pubmed/36854601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065392 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Lindén, Anja Fisher, Jane Lilja, Gisela Olsen, Markus Harboe Sjövall, Fredrik Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Samuelsson, Line Oras, Jonatan Linder, Adam Unden, Johan Kander, T Lipcsey, Miklós Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus C Bentzer, Peter Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
title | Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
title_full | Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
title_fullStr | Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
title_short | Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
title_sort | protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (reduse): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindenanja protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT fisherjane protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT liljagisela protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT olsenmarkusharboe protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT sjovallfredrik protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT jungnermarten protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT spangforsmartin protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT samuelssonline protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT orasjonatan protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT linderadam protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT undenjohan protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT kandert protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT lipcseymiklos protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT nielsenniklas protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT jakobsenjanusc protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial AT bentzerpeter protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial |