Cargando…

Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial

INTRODUCTION: Administration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindén, Anja, Fisher, Jane, Lilja, Gisela, Olsen, Markus Harboe, Sjövall, Fredrik, Jungner, Mårten, Spångfors, Martin, Samuelsson, Line, Oras, Jonatan, Linder, Adam, Unden, Johan, Kander, T, Lipcsey, Miklós, Nielsen, Niklas, Jakobsen, Janus C, Bentzer, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065392
_version_ 1784899889643126784
author Lindén, Anja
Fisher, Jane
Lilja, Gisela
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Sjövall, Fredrik
Jungner, Mårten
Spångfors, Martin
Samuelsson, Line
Oras, Jonatan
Linder, Adam
Unden, Johan
Kander, T
Lipcsey, Miklós
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus C
Bentzer, Peter
author_facet Lindén, Anja
Fisher, Jane
Lilja, Gisela
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Sjövall, Fredrik
Jungner, Mårten
Spångfors, Martin
Samuelsson, Line
Oras, Jonatan
Linder, Adam
Unden, Johan
Kander, T
Lipcsey, Miklós
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus C
Bentzer, Peter
author_sort Lindén, Anja
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Administration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the hypothesis that a protocol targeting this source of fluids can reduce fluid administration compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design will be a multicentre, randomised, feasibility trial. Adult patients admitted to ICUs with septic shock will be randomised within 12 hours of admission to receive non-resuscitation fluids either according to a restrictive protocol or to receive usual care. The healthcare providers involved in the care of participants will not be blinded. The participants, outcome assessors at the 6-month follow-up and statisticians will be blinded. Primary outcome will be litres of fluids administered within 3 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be proportion of randomised participants with outcome data on all-cause mortality; days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 90 days of inclusion; any acute kidney injury and ischaemic events in the ICU (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia); proportion of surviving randomised patients who were assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment; proportion of all eligible patients who were randomised and proportion of participants experiencing at least one protocol violation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained in Sweden. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05249088.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9980317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99803172023-03-03 Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial Lindén, Anja Fisher, Jane Lilja, Gisela Olsen, Markus Harboe Sjövall, Fredrik Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Samuelsson, Line Oras, Jonatan Linder, Adam Unden, Johan Kander, T Lipcsey, Miklós Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus C Bentzer, Peter BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Administration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the hypothesis that a protocol targeting this source of fluids can reduce fluid administration compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design will be a multicentre, randomised, feasibility trial. Adult patients admitted to ICUs with septic shock will be randomised within 12 hours of admission to receive non-resuscitation fluids either according to a restrictive protocol or to receive usual care. The healthcare providers involved in the care of participants will not be blinded. The participants, outcome assessors at the 6-month follow-up and statisticians will be blinded. Primary outcome will be litres of fluids administered within 3 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be proportion of randomised participants with outcome data on all-cause mortality; days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 90 days of inclusion; any acute kidney injury and ischaemic events in the ICU (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia); proportion of surviving randomised patients who were assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment; proportion of all eligible patients who were randomised and proportion of participants experiencing at least one protocol violation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained in Sweden. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05249088. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9980317/ /pubmed/36854601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065392 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Lindén, Anja
Fisher, Jane
Lilja, Gisela
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Sjövall, Fredrik
Jungner, Mårten
Spångfors, Martin
Samuelsson, Line
Oras, Jonatan
Linder, Adam
Unden, Johan
Kander, T
Lipcsey, Miklós
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus C
Bentzer, Peter
Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
title Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
title_full Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
title_fullStr Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
title_short Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
title_sort protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (reduse): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065392
work_keys_str_mv AT lindenanja protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT fisherjane protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT liljagisela protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT olsenmarkusharboe protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT sjovallfredrik protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT jungnermarten protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT spangforsmartin protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT samuelssonline protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT orasjonatan protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT linderadam protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT undenjohan protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT kandert protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT lipcseymiklos protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT nielsenniklas protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT jakobsenjanusc protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT bentzerpeter protocolisedreductionofnonresuscitationfluidsversususualcareinpatientswithsepticshockreduseaprotocolforamulticentrefeasibilitytrial