Cargando…
Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of pneumoconiosis worldwide and its influencing factors. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Cohort studies on occupational pneumoconiosis. PARTICIPANTS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched until November 2021...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065114 |
_version_ | 1784899890627739648 |
---|---|
author | Su, Xuesen Kong, Xiaomei Yu, Xiao Zhang, Xinri |
author_facet | Su, Xuesen Kong, Xiaomei Yu, Xiao Zhang, Xinri |
author_sort | Su, Xuesen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of pneumoconiosis worldwide and its influencing factors. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Cohort studies on occupational pneumoconiosis. PARTICIPANTS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched until November 2021. Studies were selected for meta-analysis if they involved at least one variable investigated as an influencing factor for the incidence of pneumoconiosis and reported either the parameters and 95% CIs of the risk fit to the data, or sufficient information to allow for the calculation of those values. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The pooled incidence of pneumoconiosis and risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs of influencing factors. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 19 studies with a total of 335 424 participants, of whom 29 972 developed pneumoconiosis. The pooled incidence of pneumoconiosis was 0.093 (95% CI 0.085 to 0.135). We identified the following influencing factors: (1) male (RR 3.74; 95% CI 1.31 to 10.64; p=0.01), (2) smoking (RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.43; p=0.0001), (3) tunnelling category (RR 4.75; 95% CI 1.96 to 11.53; p<0.0001), (4) helping category (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.16; p<0.0001), (5) age (the highest incidence occurs between the ages of 50 and 60), (6) duration of dust exposure (RR 4.59, 95% CI 2.41 to 8.74, p<0.01) and (7) cumulative total dust exposure (CTD) (RR 34.14, 95% CI 17.50 to 66.63, p<0.01). A dose–response analysis revealed a significant positive linear dose–response association between the risk of pneumoconiosis and duration of exposure and CTD (P-non-linearity=0.10, P-non-linearity=0.16; respectively). The Pearson correlation analysis revealed that silicosis incidence was highly correlated with cumulative silica exposure (r=0.794, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of pneumoconiosis in occupational workers was 0.093 and seven factors were found to be associated with the incidence, providing some insight into the prevention of pneumoconiosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022323233. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9980323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99803232023-03-03 Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Su, Xuesen Kong, Xiaomei Yu, Xiao Zhang, Xinri BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of pneumoconiosis worldwide and its influencing factors. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Cohort studies on occupational pneumoconiosis. PARTICIPANTS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched until November 2021. Studies were selected for meta-analysis if they involved at least one variable investigated as an influencing factor for the incidence of pneumoconiosis and reported either the parameters and 95% CIs of the risk fit to the data, or sufficient information to allow for the calculation of those values. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The pooled incidence of pneumoconiosis and risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs of influencing factors. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 19 studies with a total of 335 424 participants, of whom 29 972 developed pneumoconiosis. The pooled incidence of pneumoconiosis was 0.093 (95% CI 0.085 to 0.135). We identified the following influencing factors: (1) male (RR 3.74; 95% CI 1.31 to 10.64; p=0.01), (2) smoking (RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.43; p=0.0001), (3) tunnelling category (RR 4.75; 95% CI 1.96 to 11.53; p<0.0001), (4) helping category (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.16; p<0.0001), (5) age (the highest incidence occurs between the ages of 50 and 60), (6) duration of dust exposure (RR 4.59, 95% CI 2.41 to 8.74, p<0.01) and (7) cumulative total dust exposure (CTD) (RR 34.14, 95% CI 17.50 to 66.63, p<0.01). A dose–response analysis revealed a significant positive linear dose–response association between the risk of pneumoconiosis and duration of exposure and CTD (P-non-linearity=0.10, P-non-linearity=0.16; respectively). The Pearson correlation analysis revealed that silicosis incidence was highly correlated with cumulative silica exposure (r=0.794, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of pneumoconiosis in occupational workers was 0.093 and seven factors were found to be associated with the incidence, providing some insight into the prevention of pneumoconiosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022323233. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9980323/ /pubmed/36858466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065114 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Su, Xuesen Kong, Xiaomei Yu, Xiao Zhang, Xinri Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suxuesen incidenceandinfluencingfactorsofoccupationalpneumoconiosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kongxiaomei incidenceandinfluencingfactorsofoccupationalpneumoconiosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuxiao incidenceandinfluencingfactorsofoccupationalpneumoconiosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangxinri incidenceandinfluencingfactorsofoccupationalpneumoconiosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |