Cargando…

Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVE: Researching how public–private engagements may promote universal access to safe obstetric care including caesarean delivery is essential. The aim of this research was to document the utilisation of private general practitioners (GPs) contracted to provide caesarean delivery services in fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doherty, Tanya, Solanki, Geetesh, Daviaud, Emmanuelle, Bartmann, Yvandi, Hawkridge, Anthony, Fawcus, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067663
_version_ 1784899903089016832
author Doherty, Tanya
Solanki, Geetesh
Daviaud, Emmanuelle
Bartmann, Yvandi
Hawkridge, Anthony
Fawcus, Sue
author_facet Doherty, Tanya
Solanki, Geetesh
Daviaud, Emmanuelle
Bartmann, Yvandi
Hawkridge, Anthony
Fawcus, Sue
author_sort Doherty, Tanya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Researching how public–private engagements may promote universal access to safe obstetric care including caesarean delivery is essential. The aim of this research was to document the utilisation of private general practitioners (GPs) contracted to provide caesarean delivery services in five rural district hospitals in the Western Cape, the profile and outcomes of caesarean deliveries. We also describe stakeholder experiences of these arrangements in order to inform potential models of public–private contracting for obstetric services. DESIGN: We used a mixed-methods study design to describe rural district hospitals’ utilisation of private GP contracting for caesarean deliveries. Between April 2021 and March 2022, we collated routine data from delivery and theatre registers to capture the profile of deliveries and maternal outcomes. We conducted 23 semistructured qualitative interviews with district managers, hospital-employed doctors and private GPs to explore their experiences of the contracting arrangements. SETTING: The study was conducted in five rural district hospitals in the Western Cape province, South Africa. RESULTS: The use of private GPs as surgeon or anaesthetist for caesarean deliveries differed widely across the hospitals. Overall, the utilisation of private GPs for anaesthetics was similar (29% of all caesarean deliveries) to the utilisation of private GPs as surgeons (33% of all caesarean deliveries). The proportion of caesarean deliveries undertaken by private GPs as the primary surgeon was inversely related to size of hospital and mean monthly deliveries. Adverse outcomes following a caesarean delivery were rare. Qualitative data provided insights into contributions made by private GPs and the contracting models, which did not incentivise overservicing. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that private GPs can play an important role in filling gaps and expanding quality care in rural public facilities that have insufficient obstetric skills and expertise. Different approaches to enable access to safe caesarean delivery are needed for different contexts, and contracting with experienced private GP’s is one resource for rural district hospitals to consider.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9980375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99803752023-03-03 Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study Doherty, Tanya Solanki, Geetesh Daviaud, Emmanuelle Bartmann, Yvandi Hawkridge, Anthony Fawcus, Sue BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: Researching how public–private engagements may promote universal access to safe obstetric care including caesarean delivery is essential. The aim of this research was to document the utilisation of private general practitioners (GPs) contracted to provide caesarean delivery services in five rural district hospitals in the Western Cape, the profile and outcomes of caesarean deliveries. We also describe stakeholder experiences of these arrangements in order to inform potential models of public–private contracting for obstetric services. DESIGN: We used a mixed-methods study design to describe rural district hospitals’ utilisation of private GP contracting for caesarean deliveries. Between April 2021 and March 2022, we collated routine data from delivery and theatre registers to capture the profile of deliveries and maternal outcomes. We conducted 23 semistructured qualitative interviews with district managers, hospital-employed doctors and private GPs to explore their experiences of the contracting arrangements. SETTING: The study was conducted in five rural district hospitals in the Western Cape province, South Africa. RESULTS: The use of private GPs as surgeon or anaesthetist for caesarean deliveries differed widely across the hospitals. Overall, the utilisation of private GPs for anaesthetics was similar (29% of all caesarean deliveries) to the utilisation of private GPs as surgeons (33% of all caesarean deliveries). The proportion of caesarean deliveries undertaken by private GPs as the primary surgeon was inversely related to size of hospital and mean monthly deliveries. Adverse outcomes following a caesarean delivery were rare. Qualitative data provided insights into contributions made by private GPs and the contracting models, which did not incentivise overservicing. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that private GPs can play an important role in filling gaps and expanding quality care in rural public facilities that have insufficient obstetric skills and expertise. Different approaches to enable access to safe caesarean delivery are needed for different contexts, and contracting with experienced private GP’s is one resource for rural district hospitals to consider. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9980375/ /pubmed/36858464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067663 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Doherty, Tanya
Solanki, Geetesh
Daviaud, Emmanuelle
Bartmann, Yvandi
Hawkridge, Anthony
Fawcus, Sue
Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
title Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
title_full Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
title_short Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study
title_sort utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in south africa: a mixed-methods study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067663
work_keys_str_mv AT dohertytanya utilisationofprivategeneralpractitionerstoprovidecaesareandeliveriesinfiveruraldistrictpublichospitalsinsouthafricaamixedmethodsstudy
AT solankigeetesh utilisationofprivategeneralpractitionerstoprovidecaesareandeliveriesinfiveruraldistrictpublichospitalsinsouthafricaamixedmethodsstudy
AT daviaudemmanuelle utilisationofprivategeneralpractitionerstoprovidecaesareandeliveriesinfiveruraldistrictpublichospitalsinsouthafricaamixedmethodsstudy
AT bartmannyvandi utilisationofprivategeneralpractitionerstoprovidecaesareandeliveriesinfiveruraldistrictpublichospitalsinsouthafricaamixedmethodsstudy
AT hawkridgeanthony utilisationofprivategeneralpractitionerstoprovidecaesareandeliveriesinfiveruraldistrictpublichospitalsinsouthafricaamixedmethodsstudy
AT fawcussue utilisationofprivategeneralpractitionerstoprovidecaesareandeliveriesinfiveruraldistrictpublichospitalsinsouthafricaamixedmethodsstudy