Cargando…

Hospital-wide survey of clinical experience with artificial intelligence applied to daily chest radiographs

PURPOSE: To assess experience with and perceptions of clinical application of artificial intelligence (AI) to chest radiographs among doctors in a single hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital-wide online survey of the use of commercially available AI-based lesion detection software for chest r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Hyun Joo, Lee, Seungsoo, Kim, Sungwon, Son, Nak-Hoon, Kim, Eun-Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282123
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To assess experience with and perceptions of clinical application of artificial intelligence (AI) to chest radiographs among doctors in a single hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital-wide online survey of the use of commercially available AI-based lesion detection software for chest radiographs was conducted with all clinicians and radiologists at our hospital in this prospective study. In our hospital, version 2 of the abovementioned software was utilized from March 2020 to February 2021 and could detect three types of lesions. Version 3 was utilized for chest radiographs by detecting nine types of lesions from March 2021. The participants of this survey answered questions on their own experience using AI-based software in daily practice. The questionnaires were composed of single choice, multiple choices, and scale bar questions. Answers were analyzed according to the clinicians and radiologists using paired t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three doctors answered the survey, and 74% completed all questions. The proportion of individuals who utilized AI was higher among radiologists than clinicians (82.5% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.008). AI was perceived as being the most useful in the emergency room, and pneumothorax was considered the most valuable finding. Approximately 21% of clinicians and 16% of radiologists changed their own reading results after referring to AI, and trust levels for AI were 64.9% and 66.5%, respectively. Participants thought AI helped reduce reading times and reading requests. They answered that AI helped increase diagnostic accuracy and were more positive about AI after actual usage. CONCLUSION: Actual adaptation of AI for daily chest radiographs received overall positive feedback from clinicians and radiologists in this hospital-wide survey. Participating doctors preferred to use AI and regarded it more favorably after actual working with the AI-based software in daily clinical practice.