Cargando…

Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections

The use of 2-dimensional representations (e.g. photographs or digital images) of real-life physical objects has been an important tool in studies of animal cognition. Horses are reported to recognise objects and individuals (conspecifics and humans) from printed photographs, but it is unclear whethe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kappel, Sarah, Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A., Collins, Sarah, Herborn, Katherine, Mendl, Michael, Fureix, Carole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6
_version_ 1784899981654622208
author Kappel, Sarah
Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A.
Collins, Sarah
Herborn, Katherine
Mendl, Michael
Fureix, Carole
author_facet Kappel, Sarah
Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A.
Collins, Sarah
Herborn, Katherine
Mendl, Michael
Fureix, Carole
author_sort Kappel, Sarah
collection PubMed
description The use of 2-dimensional representations (e.g. photographs or digital images) of real-life physical objects has been an important tool in studies of animal cognition. Horses are reported to recognise objects and individuals (conspecifics and humans) from printed photographs, but it is unclear whether image recognition is also true for digital images, e.g. computer projections. We expected that horses trained to discriminate between two real-life objects would show the same learnt response to digital images of these objects indicating that the images were perceived as objects, or representations of such. Riding-school horses (N = 27) learnt to touch one of two objects (target object counterbalanced between horses) to instantly receive a food reward. After discrimination learning (three consecutive sessions of 8/10 correct trials), horses were immediately tested with on-screen images of the objects over 10 image trials interspersed with five real object trials. At first image presentation, all but two horses spontaneously responded to the images with the learnt behaviour by contacting one of the two images, but the number of horses touching the correct image was not different from chance (14/27 horses, p > 0.05). Only one horse touched the correct image above chance level across 10 image trials (9/10 correct responses, p = 0.021). Our findings thus question whether horses recognise real-life objects from digital images. We discuss how methodological factors and individual differences (i.e. age, welfare state) might have influenced animals’ response to the images, and the importance of validating the suitability of stimuli of this kind for cognitive studies in horses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9980859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99808592023-03-03 Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections Kappel, Sarah Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A. Collins, Sarah Herborn, Katherine Mendl, Michael Fureix, Carole Anim Cogn Original Paper The use of 2-dimensional representations (e.g. photographs or digital images) of real-life physical objects has been an important tool in studies of animal cognition. Horses are reported to recognise objects and individuals (conspecifics and humans) from printed photographs, but it is unclear whether image recognition is also true for digital images, e.g. computer projections. We expected that horses trained to discriminate between two real-life objects would show the same learnt response to digital images of these objects indicating that the images were perceived as objects, or representations of such. Riding-school horses (N = 27) learnt to touch one of two objects (target object counterbalanced between horses) to instantly receive a food reward. After discrimination learning (three consecutive sessions of 8/10 correct trials), horses were immediately tested with on-screen images of the objects over 10 image trials interspersed with five real object trials. At first image presentation, all but two horses spontaneously responded to the images with the learnt behaviour by contacting one of the two images, but the number of horses touching the correct image was not different from chance (14/27 horses, p > 0.05). Only one horse touched the correct image above chance level across 10 image trials (9/10 correct responses, p = 0.021). Our findings thus question whether horses recognise real-life objects from digital images. We discuss how methodological factors and individual differences (i.e. age, welfare state) might have influenced animals’ response to the images, and the importance of validating the suitability of stimuli of this kind for cognitive studies in horses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9980859/ /pubmed/36864246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kappel, Sarah
Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A.
Collins, Sarah
Herborn, Katherine
Mendl, Michael
Fureix, Carole
Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
title Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
title_full Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
title_fullStr Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
title_full_unstemmed Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
title_short Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
title_sort do you see what i see? testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2d computer projections
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kappelsarah doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections
AT ramirezmontesdeocamarcoa doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections
AT collinssarah doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections
AT herbornkatherine doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections
AT mendlmichael doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections
AT fureixcarole doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections