Cargando…
Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections
The use of 2-dimensional representations (e.g. photographs or digital images) of real-life physical objects has been an important tool in studies of animal cognition. Horses are reported to recognise objects and individuals (conspecifics and humans) from printed photographs, but it is unclear whethe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6 |
_version_ | 1784899981654622208 |
---|---|
author | Kappel, Sarah Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A. Collins, Sarah Herborn, Katherine Mendl, Michael Fureix, Carole |
author_facet | Kappel, Sarah Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A. Collins, Sarah Herborn, Katherine Mendl, Michael Fureix, Carole |
author_sort | Kappel, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of 2-dimensional representations (e.g. photographs or digital images) of real-life physical objects has been an important tool in studies of animal cognition. Horses are reported to recognise objects and individuals (conspecifics and humans) from printed photographs, but it is unclear whether image recognition is also true for digital images, e.g. computer projections. We expected that horses trained to discriminate between two real-life objects would show the same learnt response to digital images of these objects indicating that the images were perceived as objects, or representations of such. Riding-school horses (N = 27) learnt to touch one of two objects (target object counterbalanced between horses) to instantly receive a food reward. After discrimination learning (three consecutive sessions of 8/10 correct trials), horses were immediately tested with on-screen images of the objects over 10 image trials interspersed with five real object trials. At first image presentation, all but two horses spontaneously responded to the images with the learnt behaviour by contacting one of the two images, but the number of horses touching the correct image was not different from chance (14/27 horses, p > 0.05). Only one horse touched the correct image above chance level across 10 image trials (9/10 correct responses, p = 0.021). Our findings thus question whether horses recognise real-life objects from digital images. We discuss how methodological factors and individual differences (i.e. age, welfare state) might have influenced animals’ response to the images, and the importance of validating the suitability of stimuli of this kind for cognitive studies in horses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9980859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99808592023-03-03 Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections Kappel, Sarah Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A. Collins, Sarah Herborn, Katherine Mendl, Michael Fureix, Carole Anim Cogn Original Paper The use of 2-dimensional representations (e.g. photographs or digital images) of real-life physical objects has been an important tool in studies of animal cognition. Horses are reported to recognise objects and individuals (conspecifics and humans) from printed photographs, but it is unclear whether image recognition is also true for digital images, e.g. computer projections. We expected that horses trained to discriminate between two real-life objects would show the same learnt response to digital images of these objects indicating that the images were perceived as objects, or representations of such. Riding-school horses (N = 27) learnt to touch one of two objects (target object counterbalanced between horses) to instantly receive a food reward. After discrimination learning (three consecutive sessions of 8/10 correct trials), horses were immediately tested with on-screen images of the objects over 10 image trials interspersed with five real object trials. At first image presentation, all but two horses spontaneously responded to the images with the learnt behaviour by contacting one of the two images, but the number of horses touching the correct image was not different from chance (14/27 horses, p > 0.05). Only one horse touched the correct image above chance level across 10 image trials (9/10 correct responses, p = 0.021). Our findings thus question whether horses recognise real-life objects from digital images. We discuss how methodological factors and individual differences (i.e. age, welfare state) might have influenced animals’ response to the images, and the importance of validating the suitability of stimuli of this kind for cognitive studies in horses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9980859/ /pubmed/36864246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kappel, Sarah Ramirez Montes De Oca, Marco A. Collins, Sarah Herborn, Katherine Mendl, Michael Fureix, Carole Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections |
title | Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections |
title_full | Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections |
title_fullStr | Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections |
title_full_unstemmed | Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections |
title_short | Do you see what I see? Testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections |
title_sort | do you see what i see? testing horses’ ability to recognise real-life objects from 2d computer projections |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kappelsarah doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections AT ramirezmontesdeocamarcoa doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections AT collinssarah doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections AT herbornkatherine doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections AT mendlmichael doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections AT fureixcarole doyouseewhatiseetestinghorsesabilitytorecognisereallifeobjectsfrom2dcomputerprojections |