Evaluation of a visual acuity eHealth tool in patients with cataract

To validate the Easee web-based tool for the assessment of visual acuity in patients who underwent cataract surgery. SETTING: University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Prospective method comparison study. METHODS: Subjects aged between 18 and 69 years who underwent cataract surgery on 1 or both eyes at the Maastricht University Medical Center+ were eligible to participate in this study. The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) assessments were performed using the web-based tool (index test) and conventional ETDRS and Snellen charts (reference tests). The outcomes of the different tests were expressed in logMAR, and a difference of <0.15 logMAR was considered clinically acceptable. RESULTS: 46 subjects with 75 operated eyes were included in this study. The difference of the UDVA between the web-based tool and ETDRS or Snellen was −0.05 ± 0.10 logMAR (P < .001 [0.15; −0.26]) and −0.04 ± 0.15 logMAR (P = .018 [0.24; −0.33]), respectively. For the CDVA, these differences were −0.04 ± 0.08 logMAR (P < .001 [0.13; −0.21]) and −0.07 ± 0.10 logMAR (P < .001 [0.13; −0.27]), respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the web-based tool and ETDRS were maximally 0.94 and compared with Snellen 0.92. In total, 73% to 88% of the visual acuity measurement differences were within 0.15 logMAR. CONCLUSIONS: The web-based tool was validated for the assessment of visual acuity in patients who underwent cataract surgery and showed clinically acceptable outcomes in up to 88% of patients. Most of the participants had a positive attitude toward the web-based tool, which requires basic digital skills.