Cargando…

Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses

In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Doorn, Johnny, Aust, Frederik, Haaf, Julia M., Stefan, Angelika M., Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x
_version_ 1784900117585723392
author van Doorn, Johnny
Aust, Frederik
Haaf, Julia M.
Stefan, Angelika M.
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
author_facet van Doorn, Johnny
Aust, Frederik
Haaf, Julia M.
Stefan, Angelika M.
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
author_sort van Doorn, Johnny
collection PubMed
description In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice—a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9981503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99815032023-03-04 Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses van Doorn, Johnny Aust, Frederik Haaf, Julia M. Stefan, Angelika M. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Comput Brain Behav Original Paper In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice—a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9981503/ /pubmed/36879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
van Doorn, Johnny
Aust, Frederik
Haaf, Julia M.
Stefan, Angelika M.
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
title Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
title_full Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
title_fullStr Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
title_full_unstemmed Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
title_short Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
title_sort bayes factors for mixed models: perspective on responses
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vandoornjohnny bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses
AT austfrederik bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses
AT haafjuliam bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses
AT stefanangelikam bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses
AT wagenmakersericjan bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses