Cargando…
Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses
In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x |
_version_ | 1784900117585723392 |
---|---|
author | van Doorn, Johnny Aust, Frederik Haaf, Julia M. Stefan, Angelika M. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan |
author_facet | van Doorn, Johnny Aust, Frederik Haaf, Julia M. Stefan, Angelika M. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan |
author_sort | van Doorn, Johnny |
collection | PubMed |
description | In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice—a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9981503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99815032023-03-04 Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses van Doorn, Johnny Aust, Frederik Haaf, Julia M. Stefan, Angelika M. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Comput Brain Behav Original Paper In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice—a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9981503/ /pubmed/36879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper van Doorn, Johnny Aust, Frederik Haaf, Julia M. Stefan, Angelika M. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses |
title | Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses |
title_full | Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses |
title_fullStr | Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses |
title_short | Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses |
title_sort | bayes factors for mixed models: perspective on responses |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandoornjohnny bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses AT austfrederik bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses AT haafjuliam bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses AT stefanangelikam bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses AT wagenmakersericjan bayesfactorsformixedmodelsperspectiveonresponses |