Cargando…
Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis
In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been a promising approach in the research of treatment outcome prediction in psychosis. In this study, we reviewed ML studies using different neuroimaging, neurophysiological, genetic, and clinical features to predict antipsychotic treatment outcomes in pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02371-z |
_version_ | 1784900171588435968 |
---|---|
author | Del Fabro, Lorenzo Bondi, Elena Serio, Francesca Maggioni, Eleonora D’Agostino, Armando Brambilla, Paolo |
author_facet | Del Fabro, Lorenzo Bondi, Elena Serio, Francesca Maggioni, Eleonora D’Agostino, Armando Brambilla, Paolo |
author_sort | Del Fabro, Lorenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been a promising approach in the research of treatment outcome prediction in psychosis. In this study, we reviewed ML studies using different neuroimaging, neurophysiological, genetic, and clinical features to predict antipsychotic treatment outcomes in patients at different stages of schizophrenia. Literature available on PubMed until March 2022 was reviewed. Overall, 28 studies were included, among them 23 using a single-modality approach and 5 combining data from multiple modalities. The majority of included studies considered structural and functional neuroimaging biomarkers as predictive features used in ML models. Specifically, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) features contributed to antipsychotic treatment response prediction of psychosis with good accuracies. Additionally, several studies found that ML models based on clinical features might present adequate predictive ability. Importantly, by examining the additive effects of combining features, the predictive value might be improved by applying multimodal ML approaches. However, most of the included studies presented several limitations, such as small sample sizes and a lack of replication tests. Moreover, considerable clinical and analytical heterogeneity among included studies posed a challenge in synthesizing findings and generating robust overall conclusions. Despite the complexity and heterogeneity of methodology, prognostic features, clinical presentation, and treatment approaches, studies included in this review suggest that ML tools may have the potential to predict treatment outcomes of psychosis accurately. Future studies need to focus on refining feature characterization, validating prediction models, and evaluate their translation in real-world clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9981732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99817322023-03-04 Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis Del Fabro, Lorenzo Bondi, Elena Serio, Francesca Maggioni, Eleonora D’Agostino, Armando Brambilla, Paolo Transl Psychiatry Review Article In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been a promising approach in the research of treatment outcome prediction in psychosis. In this study, we reviewed ML studies using different neuroimaging, neurophysiological, genetic, and clinical features to predict antipsychotic treatment outcomes in patients at different stages of schizophrenia. Literature available on PubMed until March 2022 was reviewed. Overall, 28 studies were included, among them 23 using a single-modality approach and 5 combining data from multiple modalities. The majority of included studies considered structural and functional neuroimaging biomarkers as predictive features used in ML models. Specifically, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) features contributed to antipsychotic treatment response prediction of psychosis with good accuracies. Additionally, several studies found that ML models based on clinical features might present adequate predictive ability. Importantly, by examining the additive effects of combining features, the predictive value might be improved by applying multimodal ML approaches. However, most of the included studies presented several limitations, such as small sample sizes and a lack of replication tests. Moreover, considerable clinical and analytical heterogeneity among included studies posed a challenge in synthesizing findings and generating robust overall conclusions. Despite the complexity and heterogeneity of methodology, prognostic features, clinical presentation, and treatment approaches, studies included in this review suggest that ML tools may have the potential to predict treatment outcomes of psychosis accurately. Future studies need to focus on refining feature characterization, validating prediction models, and evaluate their translation in real-world clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9981732/ /pubmed/36864017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02371-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Del Fabro, Lorenzo Bondi, Elena Serio, Francesca Maggioni, Eleonora D’Agostino, Armando Brambilla, Paolo Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
title | Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
title_full | Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
title_fullStr | Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
title_short | Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
title_sort | machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02371-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delfabrolorenzo machinelearningmethodstopredictoutcomesofpharmacologicaltreatmentinpsychosis AT bondielena machinelearningmethodstopredictoutcomesofpharmacologicaltreatmentinpsychosis AT seriofrancesca machinelearningmethodstopredictoutcomesofpharmacologicaltreatmentinpsychosis AT maggionieleonora machinelearningmethodstopredictoutcomesofpharmacologicaltreatmentinpsychosis AT dagostinoarmando machinelearningmethodstopredictoutcomesofpharmacologicaltreatmentinpsychosis AT brambillapaolo machinelearningmethodstopredictoutcomesofpharmacologicaltreatmentinpsychosis |