Cargando…

Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study

The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hidalgo-García, César, Lorente, Ana I., López-de-Celis, Carlos, Lucha-López, María Orosia, Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo, Maza-Frechín, Mario, Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel, Krauss, John, Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3
_version_ 1784900172884475904
author Hidalgo-García, César
Lorente, Ana I.
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Lucha-López, María Orosia
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Maza-Frechín, Mario
Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel
Krauss, John
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
author_facet Hidalgo-García, César
Lorente, Ana I.
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Lucha-López, María Orosia
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Maza-Frechín, Mario
Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel
Krauss, John
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
author_sort Hidalgo-García, César
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. Ten cryopreserved C0–C2 specimens (mean age 74 years, range 63–85 years) were manually mobilized in 1. axial rotation, 2. rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 3. rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical range of motion and the force used to generate the motion were measured using an optical motion system and a load cell respectively. The range of motion (ROM) without C0–C1 stabilization was 9.8° ± 3.9° in right rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 15.5° ± 5.9° in left rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 6.7° ± 4.3° and 13.6° ± 5.3°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 35.1° ± 6.0° in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and 29.0° ± 6.5° in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 25.7° ± 6.4° (p = 0.007) and 25.3° ± 7.1°, respectively. Neither rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending (left or right) or left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending reached statistical significance. ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° (p = 0.005) and 23.7° ± 8.5° (p = 0.013) respectively. The stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical axial rotation in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and right and left axial rotations; however, this reduction was not present in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending or both combinations of rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9981738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99817382023-03-04 Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study Hidalgo-García, César Lorente, Ana I. López-de-Celis, Carlos Lucha-López, María Orosia Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Maza-Frechín, Mario Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel Krauss, John Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. Ten cryopreserved C0–C2 specimens (mean age 74 years, range 63–85 years) were manually mobilized in 1. axial rotation, 2. rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 3. rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical range of motion and the force used to generate the motion were measured using an optical motion system and a load cell respectively. The range of motion (ROM) without C0–C1 stabilization was 9.8° ± 3.9° in right rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 15.5° ± 5.9° in left rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 6.7° ± 4.3° and 13.6° ± 5.3°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 35.1° ± 6.0° in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and 29.0° ± 6.5° in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 25.7° ± 6.4° (p = 0.007) and 25.3° ± 7.1°, respectively. Neither rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending (left or right) or left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending reached statistical significance. ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° (p = 0.005) and 23.7° ± 8.5° (p = 0.013) respectively. The stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical axial rotation in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and right and left axial rotations; however, this reduction was not present in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending or both combinations of rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9981738/ /pubmed/36864117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hidalgo-García, César
Lorente, Ana I.
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Lucha-López, María Orosia
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Maza-Frechín, Mario
Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel
Krauss, John
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
title Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
title_full Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
title_short Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
title_sort effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hidalgogarciacesar effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT lorenteanai effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT lopezdeceliscarlos effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT luchalopezmariaorosia effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT rodriguezsanzjacobo effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT mazafrechinmario effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT tricasmorenojosemiguel effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT kraussjohn effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy
AT perezbellmuntalbert effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy