Cargando…
Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study
The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3 |
_version_ | 1784900172884475904 |
---|---|
author | Hidalgo-García, César Lorente, Ana I. López-de-Celis, Carlos Lucha-López, María Orosia Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Maza-Frechín, Mario Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel Krauss, John Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert |
author_facet | Hidalgo-García, César Lorente, Ana I. López-de-Celis, Carlos Lucha-López, María Orosia Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Maza-Frechín, Mario Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel Krauss, John Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert |
author_sort | Hidalgo-García, César |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. Ten cryopreserved C0–C2 specimens (mean age 74 years, range 63–85 years) were manually mobilized in 1. axial rotation, 2. rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 3. rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical range of motion and the force used to generate the motion were measured using an optical motion system and a load cell respectively. The range of motion (ROM) without C0–C1 stabilization was 9.8° ± 3.9° in right rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 15.5° ± 5.9° in left rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 6.7° ± 4.3° and 13.6° ± 5.3°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 35.1° ± 6.0° in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and 29.0° ± 6.5° in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 25.7° ± 6.4° (p = 0.007) and 25.3° ± 7.1°, respectively. Neither rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending (left or right) or left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending reached statistical significance. ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° (p = 0.005) and 23.7° ± 8.5° (p = 0.013) respectively. The stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical axial rotation in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and right and left axial rotations; however, this reduction was not present in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending or both combinations of rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9981738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99817382023-03-04 Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study Hidalgo-García, César Lorente, Ana I. López-de-Celis, Carlos Lucha-López, María Orosia Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Maza-Frechín, Mario Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel Krauss, John Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. Ten cryopreserved C0–C2 specimens (mean age 74 years, range 63–85 years) were manually mobilized in 1. axial rotation, 2. rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 3. rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical range of motion and the force used to generate the motion were measured using an optical motion system and a load cell respectively. The range of motion (ROM) without C0–C1 stabilization was 9.8° ± 3.9° in right rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 15.5° ± 5.9° in left rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 6.7° ± 4.3° and 13.6° ± 5.3°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 35.1° ± 6.0° in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and 29.0° ± 6.5° in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 25.7° ± 6.4° (p = 0.007) and 25.3° ± 7.1°, respectively. Neither rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending (left or right) or left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending reached statistical significance. ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° (p = 0.005) and 23.7° ± 8.5° (p = 0.013) respectively. The stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical axial rotation in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and right and left axial rotations; however, this reduction was not present in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending or both combinations of rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9981738/ /pubmed/36864117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hidalgo-García, César Lorente, Ana I. López-de-Celis, Carlos Lucha-López, María Orosia Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Maza-Frechín, Mario Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel Krauss, John Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
title | Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
title_full | Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
title_short | Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
title_sort | effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hidalgogarciacesar effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT lorenteanai effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT lopezdeceliscarlos effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT luchalopezmariaorosia effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT rodriguezsanzjacobo effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT mazafrechinmario effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT tricasmorenojosemiguel effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT kraussjohn effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy AT perezbellmuntalbert effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationontheuppercervicalspinerotationcombinationsaninvitrostudy |