Cargando…

Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature

The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puetzler, Jan, Schulze, Martin, Gosheger, Georg, Schwarze, Jan, Moellenbeck, Burkhard, Theil, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006
_version_ 1784900219649916928
author Puetzler, Jan
Schulze, Martin
Gosheger, Georg
Schwarze, Jan
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Theil, Christoph
author_facet Puetzler, Jan
Schulze, Martin
Gosheger, Georg
Schwarze, Jan
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Theil, Christoph
author_sort Puetzler, Jan
collection PubMed
description The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse infection control after second stage. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection in clinical studies published until January 2023. Eleven studies investigating TTR as a potential risk factor for reinfection met the inclusion criteria (ten retrospective and one prospective study, published 2012–2022). Study design and outcome measures differed notably. The cutoff points above which TTR was regarded as “long” ranged from 4 to 18 weeks. No study observed a benefit for long TTR. In all studies, similar or even better infection control was observed for short TTR. The optimal TTR, however, is not yet defined. Larger clinical studies with homogeneous patient populations and adjustment for confounding factors are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9981955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99819552023-03-04 Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature Puetzler, Jan Schulze, Martin Gosheger, Georg Schwarze, Jan Moellenbeck, Burkhard Theil, Christoph Front Surg Surgery The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse infection control after second stage. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection in clinical studies published until January 2023. Eleven studies investigating TTR as a potential risk factor for reinfection met the inclusion criteria (ten retrospective and one prospective study, published 2012–2022). Study design and outcome measures differed notably. The cutoff points above which TTR was regarded as “long” ranged from 4 to 18 weeks. No study observed a benefit for long TTR. In all studies, similar or even better infection control was observed for short TTR. The optimal TTR, however, is not yet defined. Larger clinical studies with homogeneous patient populations and adjustment for confounding factors are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9981955/ /pubmed/36874470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006 Text en © 2023 Puetzler, Schulze, Gosheger, Schwarze, Moellenbeck and Theil. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Puetzler, Jan
Schulze, Martin
Gosheger, Georg
Schwarze, Jan
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Theil, Christoph
Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
title Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
title_full Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
title_short Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
title_sort is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? a systematic review of the literature
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006
work_keys_str_mv AT puetzlerjan islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT schulzemartin islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT goshegergeorg islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT schwarzejan islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT moellenbeckburkhard islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT theilchristoph islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature