Cargando…
Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature
The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse inf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006 |
_version_ | 1784900219649916928 |
---|---|
author | Puetzler, Jan Schulze, Martin Gosheger, Georg Schwarze, Jan Moellenbeck, Burkhard Theil, Christoph |
author_facet | Puetzler, Jan Schulze, Martin Gosheger, Georg Schwarze, Jan Moellenbeck, Burkhard Theil, Christoph |
author_sort | Puetzler, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse infection control after second stage. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection in clinical studies published until January 2023. Eleven studies investigating TTR as a potential risk factor for reinfection met the inclusion criteria (ten retrospective and one prospective study, published 2012–2022). Study design and outcome measures differed notably. The cutoff points above which TTR was regarded as “long” ranged from 4 to 18 weeks. No study observed a benefit for long TTR. In all studies, similar or even better infection control was observed for short TTR. The optimal TTR, however, is not yet defined. Larger clinical studies with homogeneous patient populations and adjustment for confounding factors are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9981955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99819552023-03-04 Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature Puetzler, Jan Schulze, Martin Gosheger, Georg Schwarze, Jan Moellenbeck, Burkhard Theil, Christoph Front Surg Surgery The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse infection control after second stage. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection in clinical studies published until January 2023. Eleven studies investigating TTR as a potential risk factor for reinfection met the inclusion criteria (ten retrospective and one prospective study, published 2012–2022). Study design and outcome measures differed notably. The cutoff points above which TTR was regarded as “long” ranged from 4 to 18 weeks. No study observed a benefit for long TTR. In all studies, similar or even better infection control was observed for short TTR. The optimal TTR, however, is not yet defined. Larger clinical studies with homogeneous patient populations and adjustment for confounding factors are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9981955/ /pubmed/36874470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006 Text en © 2023 Puetzler, Schulze, Gosheger, Schwarze, Moellenbeck and Theil. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Puetzler, Jan Schulze, Martin Gosheger, Georg Schwarze, Jan Moellenbeck, Burkhard Theil, Christoph Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature |
title | Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puetzlerjan islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT schulzemartin islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT goshegergeorg islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT schwarzejan islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT moellenbeckburkhard islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT theilchristoph islongtimetoreimplantationariskfactorforreinfectionintwostagerevisionforperiprostheticinfectionasystematicreviewoftheliterature |