Cargando…
Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of abdominal and pelvic malignancies (APMs). MATERIALS: The search, limited to the earliest available date of indexing through 31 July 2022, was performed on P...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1093861 |
_version_ | 1784900250713980928 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xue Liu, Huiting Gao, Cailiang Zeng, Wenbing |
author_facet | Liu, Xue Liu, Huiting Gao, Cailiang Zeng, Wenbing |
author_sort | Liu, Xue |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of abdominal and pelvic malignancies (APMs). MATERIALS: The search, limited to the earliest available date of indexing through 31 July 2022, was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using a data-specific Boolean logic search strategy. We calculated the detection rate (DR) of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging and recurrence of APMs, and pooled sensitivities/specificities based on lymph nodes or distant metastases. RESULTS: We analyzed 473 patients and 2775 lesions in the 13 studies. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the primary staging and recurrence of APMs were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.87), and 0.91(95% CI: 0.61-1.00), 0.56 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68), respectively. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary gastric cancer and liver cancer were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-0.97), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98), respectively. The pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes or distant metastases were 0.717(95% CI: 0.698-0.735) and 0.525(95% CI: 0.505-0.546), and the pooled specificities were 0.891 (95% CI: 0.858-0.918) and 0.821(95% CI: 0.786-0.853), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis concluded that (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT had a high overall diagnostic performance in detecting the primary staging and lymph nodes or distant metastases of APMs, but the detection ability of (68)Ga-FAPI was significantly higher than that of (18)F-FDG. However, the ability of (68)Ga-FAPI to diagnose lymph node metastasis is not very satisfactory, and is significantly lower than that of distant metastasis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022332700. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9982086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99820862023-03-04 Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Xue Liu, Huiting Gao, Cailiang Zeng, Wenbing Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of abdominal and pelvic malignancies (APMs). MATERIALS: The search, limited to the earliest available date of indexing through 31 July 2022, was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using a data-specific Boolean logic search strategy. We calculated the detection rate (DR) of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging and recurrence of APMs, and pooled sensitivities/specificities based on lymph nodes or distant metastases. RESULTS: We analyzed 473 patients and 2775 lesions in the 13 studies. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the primary staging and recurrence of APMs were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.87), and 0.91(95% CI: 0.61-1.00), 0.56 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68), respectively. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary gastric cancer and liver cancer were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-0.97), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98), respectively. The pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes or distant metastases were 0.717(95% CI: 0.698-0.735) and 0.525(95% CI: 0.505-0.546), and the pooled specificities were 0.891 (95% CI: 0.858-0.918) and 0.821(95% CI: 0.786-0.853), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis concluded that (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT had a high overall diagnostic performance in detecting the primary staging and lymph nodes or distant metastases of APMs, but the detection ability of (68)Ga-FAPI was significantly higher than that of (18)F-FDG. However, the ability of (68)Ga-FAPI to diagnose lymph node metastasis is not very satisfactory, and is significantly lower than that of distant metastasis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022332700. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9982086/ /pubmed/36874127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1093861 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liu, Liu, Gao and Zeng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Liu, Xue Liu, Huiting Gao, Cailiang Zeng, Wenbing Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of (68)ga-fapi and (18)f-fdg pet/ct for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1093861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxue comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuhuiting comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaocailiang comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zengwenbing comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |