Cargando…

Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of abdominal and pelvic malignancies (APMs). MATERIALS: The search, limited to the earliest available date of indexing through 31 July 2022, was performed on P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xue, Liu, Huiting, Gao, Cailiang, Zeng, Wenbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874127
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1093861
_version_ 1784900250713980928
author Liu, Xue
Liu, Huiting
Gao, Cailiang
Zeng, Wenbing
author_facet Liu, Xue
Liu, Huiting
Gao, Cailiang
Zeng, Wenbing
author_sort Liu, Xue
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of abdominal and pelvic malignancies (APMs). MATERIALS: The search, limited to the earliest available date of indexing through 31 July 2022, was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using a data-specific Boolean logic search strategy. We calculated the detection rate (DR) of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging and recurrence of APMs, and pooled sensitivities/specificities based on lymph nodes or distant metastases. RESULTS: We analyzed 473 patients and 2775 lesions in the 13 studies. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the primary staging and recurrence of APMs were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.87), and 0.91(95% CI: 0.61-1.00), 0.56 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68), respectively. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary gastric cancer and liver cancer were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-0.97), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98), respectively. The pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes or distant metastases were 0.717(95% CI: 0.698-0.735) and 0.525(95% CI: 0.505-0.546), and the pooled specificities were 0.891 (95% CI: 0.858-0.918) and 0.821(95% CI: 0.786-0.853), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis concluded that (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT had a high overall diagnostic performance in detecting the primary staging and lymph nodes or distant metastases of APMs, but the detection ability of (68)Ga-FAPI was significantly higher than that of (18)F-FDG. However, the ability of (68)Ga-FAPI to diagnose lymph node metastasis is not very satisfactory, and is significantly lower than that of distant metastasis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022332700.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9982086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99820862023-03-04 Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Xue Liu, Huiting Gao, Cailiang Zeng, Wenbing Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of abdominal and pelvic malignancies (APMs). MATERIALS: The search, limited to the earliest available date of indexing through 31 July 2022, was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using a data-specific Boolean logic search strategy. We calculated the detection rate (DR) of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging and recurrence of APMs, and pooled sensitivities/specificities based on lymph nodes or distant metastases. RESULTS: We analyzed 473 patients and 2775 lesions in the 13 studies. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the primary staging and recurrence of APMs were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.87), and 0.91(95% CI: 0.61-1.00), 0.56 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68), respectively. The DRs of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary gastric cancer and liver cancer were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-0.97), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98), respectively. The pooled sensitivities of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes or distant metastases were 0.717(95% CI: 0.698-0.735) and 0.525(95% CI: 0.505-0.546), and the pooled specificities were 0.891 (95% CI: 0.858-0.918) and 0.821(95% CI: 0.786-0.853), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis concluded that (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT had a high overall diagnostic performance in detecting the primary staging and lymph nodes or distant metastases of APMs, but the detection ability of (68)Ga-FAPI was significantly higher than that of (18)F-FDG. However, the ability of (68)Ga-FAPI to diagnose lymph node metastasis is not very satisfactory, and is significantly lower than that of distant metastasis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022332700. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9982086/ /pubmed/36874127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1093861 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liu, Liu, Gao and Zeng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Liu, Xue
Liu, Huiting
Gao, Cailiang
Zeng, Wenbing
Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of (68)ga-fapi and (18)f-fdg pet/ct for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874127
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1093861
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxue comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhuiting comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaocailiang comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zengwenbing comparisonof68gafapiand18ffdgpetctforthediagnosisofprimaryandmetastaticlesionsinabdominalandpelvicmalignanciesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis