Cargando…
Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses
INTRODUCTION: For decades, a substantial body of research has confirmed the subjective nature of pain. Subjectivity seems to be integrated into the concept of pain but is often confined to self-reported pain. Although it seems likely that past and current pain experiences would interact and influenc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1094903 |
_version_ | 1784900256255705088 |
---|---|
author | Yoo, Hyunkyung Cho, Younhee Cho, Sungkun |
author_facet | Yoo, Hyunkyung Cho, Younhee Cho, Sungkun |
author_sort | Yoo, Hyunkyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: For decades, a substantial body of research has confirmed the subjective nature of pain. Subjectivity seems to be integrated into the concept of pain but is often confined to self-reported pain. Although it seems likely that past and current pain experiences would interact and influence subjective pain reports, the influence of these factors has not been investigated in the context of physiological pain. The current study focused on exploring the influence of past/current pain on self-reporting and pupillary responses to pain. METHODS: Overall, 47 participants were divided into two groups, a 4°C–10°C group (experiencing major pain first) and a 10°C–4°C group (experiencing minor pain first), and performed cold pressor tasks (CPT) twice for 30 s each. During the two rounds of CPT, participants reported their pain intensity, and their pupillary responses were measured. Subsequently, they reappraised their pain ratings in the first CPT session. RESULTS: Self-reported pain showed a significant difference (4°C–10°C: p = 0.045; 10°C–4°C: p < 0.001) in the rating of cold pain stimuli in both groups, and this gap was higher in the 10°C–4°C group than in the 4°C–10°C group. In terms of pupillary response, the 4°C–10°C group exhibited a significant difference in pupil diameter, whereas this was marginally significant in the 10°C–4°C group (4°C–10°C: p < 0.001; 10°C–4°C: p = 0.062). There were no significant changes in self-reported pain after reappraisal in either group. DISCUSSION: The findings of the current study confirmed that subjective and physiological responses to pain can be altered by previous experiences of pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9982106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99821062023-03-04 Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses Yoo, Hyunkyung Cho, Younhee Cho, Sungkun Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: For decades, a substantial body of research has confirmed the subjective nature of pain. Subjectivity seems to be integrated into the concept of pain but is often confined to self-reported pain. Although it seems likely that past and current pain experiences would interact and influence subjective pain reports, the influence of these factors has not been investigated in the context of physiological pain. The current study focused on exploring the influence of past/current pain on self-reporting and pupillary responses to pain. METHODS: Overall, 47 participants were divided into two groups, a 4°C–10°C group (experiencing major pain first) and a 10°C–4°C group (experiencing minor pain first), and performed cold pressor tasks (CPT) twice for 30 s each. During the two rounds of CPT, participants reported their pain intensity, and their pupillary responses were measured. Subsequently, they reappraised their pain ratings in the first CPT session. RESULTS: Self-reported pain showed a significant difference (4°C–10°C: p = 0.045; 10°C–4°C: p < 0.001) in the rating of cold pain stimuli in both groups, and this gap was higher in the 10°C–4°C group than in the 4°C–10°C group. In terms of pupillary response, the 4°C–10°C group exhibited a significant difference in pupil diameter, whereas this was marginally significant in the 10°C–4°C group (4°C–10°C: p < 0.001; 10°C–4°C: p = 0.062). There were no significant changes in self-reported pain after reappraisal in either group. DISCUSSION: The findings of the current study confirmed that subjective and physiological responses to pain can be altered by previous experiences of pain. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9982106/ /pubmed/36874838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1094903 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yoo, Cho and Cho. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Yoo, Hyunkyung Cho, Younhee Cho, Sungkun Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
title | Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
title_full | Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
title_fullStr | Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
title_short | Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
title_sort | does past/current pain change pain experience? comparing self-reports and pupillary responses |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1094903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoohyunkyung doespastcurrentpainchangepainexperiencecomparingselfreportsandpupillaryresponses AT choyounhee doespastcurrentpainchangepainexperiencecomparingselfreportsandpupillaryresponses AT chosungkun doespastcurrentpainchangepainexperiencecomparingselfreportsandpupillaryresponses |