Cargando…

Interactive Direct Interhospital Transfer Network System for Acute Stroke in South Korea

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interhospital transfer is an essential practical component of regional stroke care systems. To establish an effective stroke transfer network in South Korea, an interactive transfer system was constructed, and its workflow metrics were observed. METHODS: In March 2019, a dire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Inyoung, Bae, Hee-Joon, Kim, Beom Joon, Kim, Jun Yup, Han, Moon-Ku, Kim, Jinhwi, Jung, Cheolkyu, Kang, Jihoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurological Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647229
http://dx.doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.0158
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interhospital transfer is an essential practical component of regional stroke care systems. To establish an effective stroke transfer network in South Korea, an interactive transfer system was constructed, and its workflow metrics were observed. METHODS: In March 2019, a direct transfer system between primary stroke hospitals (PSHs) and comprehensive regional stroke centers (CSCs) was established to standardize the clinical pathway of imaging, recanalization therapy, transfer decisions, and exclusive transfer linkage systems in the two types of centers. In an active case, the time metrics from arrival at PSH (“door”) to imaging was measured, and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT) were used to assess the differences in clinical situations. RESULTS: The direct transfer system was used by 27 patients. They stayed at the PSH for a median duration of 72 min (interquartile range [IQR], 38–114 min), with a median times of 15 and 58 min for imaging and subsequent processing, respectively. The door-to-needle median times of subjects treated with IVT at PSHs (n=5) and CSCs (n=2) were 21 min (IQR, 20.0–22.0 min) and 137.5 min (IQR, 125.3–149.8 min), respectively. EVT was performed on seven subjects (25.9%) at CSCs, which took a median duration of 175 min; 77 min at the PSH, 48 min for transportation, and 50 min at the CSC. Before EVT, bridging IVT at the PSH did not significantly affect the door-to-puncture time (127 min vs. 143.5 min, p=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The direct and interactive transfer system is feasible in real-world practice in South Korea and presents merits in reducing the treatment delay by sharing information during transfer.