Cargando…

The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of adjacent gingival blood flow on detection of pulpal blood flow (PBF) using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) through animal study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 36 right and left maxillary the third incisors and canines in 9 experimental do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dohyun, Ko, Hyoung-Seok, Park, Soo-Yeon, Ryu, Seung-Yeon, Park, Sung-ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875807
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e9
_version_ 1784900289291091968
author Kim, Dohyun
Ko, Hyoung-Seok
Park, Soo-Yeon
Ryu, Seung-Yeon
Park, Sung-ho
author_facet Kim, Dohyun
Ko, Hyoung-Seok
Park, Soo-Yeon
Ryu, Seung-Yeon
Park, Sung-ho
author_sort Kim, Dohyun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of adjacent gingival blood flow on detection of pulpal blood flow (PBF) using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) through animal study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 36 right and left maxillary the third incisors and canines in 9 experimental dogs. The study included 2 main steps: In the first step, the pulse sound level (PSL) was recorded on the cervical part of each tooth without flap elevation (Group 1), with flap elevation (Group 2), and after it was repositioned in place (Group 3). In the second step, the PSL was recorded on the cervical part of each tooth (Group 4), after pulpotomy (Group 5), after partial pulp extirpation (Group 6), after complete extirpation (Group 7), and after canal filling (Group 8). In Groups 5–8, the study was performed with and without flap elevation in the left and right teeth, respectively. The PSL was graded as follows: 0, inaudible; 1, heard faintly; and 2, heard well. The difference between each group was analyzed using Friedman’s test with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In step 1, the PSL results were Group 1 > 2 and 3. In step 2, there was no significant difference between the groups when the flap was not elevated, while PSL results were Group 4 > 5 ≥ 6 and 7 ≥ 8 when the flap was elevated. CONCLUSIONS: PBF is affected by gingival blood flow when measured with UDF. UDF measurements require isolation of gingiva from the tooth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9982237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99822372023-03-04 The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study Kim, Dohyun Ko, Hyoung-Seok Park, Soo-Yeon Ryu, Seung-Yeon Park, Sung-ho Restor Dent Endod Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of adjacent gingival blood flow on detection of pulpal blood flow (PBF) using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF) through animal study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 36 right and left maxillary the third incisors and canines in 9 experimental dogs. The study included 2 main steps: In the first step, the pulse sound level (PSL) was recorded on the cervical part of each tooth without flap elevation (Group 1), with flap elevation (Group 2), and after it was repositioned in place (Group 3). In the second step, the PSL was recorded on the cervical part of each tooth (Group 4), after pulpotomy (Group 5), after partial pulp extirpation (Group 6), after complete extirpation (Group 7), and after canal filling (Group 8). In Groups 5–8, the study was performed with and without flap elevation in the left and right teeth, respectively. The PSL was graded as follows: 0, inaudible; 1, heard faintly; and 2, heard well. The difference between each group was analyzed using Friedman’s test with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In step 1, the PSL results were Group 1 > 2 and 3. In step 2, there was no significant difference between the groups when the flap was not elevated, while PSL results were Group 4 > 5 ≥ 6 and 7 ≥ 8 when the flap was elevated. CONCLUSIONS: PBF is affected by gingival blood flow when measured with UDF. UDF measurements require isolation of gingiva from the tooth. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9982237/ /pubmed/36875807 http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e9 Text en Copyright © 2023. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Dohyun
Ko, Hyoung-Seok
Park, Soo-Yeon
Ryu, Seung-Yeon
Park, Sung-ho
The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study
title The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study
title_full The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study
title_fullStr The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study
title_short The effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry: animal study
title_sort effects of gingival blood flow on pulpal blood flow detection using ultrasound doppler flowmetry: animal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875807
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdohyun theeffectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT kohyoungseok theeffectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT parksooyeon theeffectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT ryuseungyeon theeffectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT parksungho theeffectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT kimdohyun effectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT kohyoungseok effectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT parksooyeon effectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT ryuseungyeon effectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy
AT parksungho effectsofgingivalbloodflowonpulpalbloodflowdetectionusingultrasounddopplerflowmetryanimalstudy