Cargando…

Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kondo, Toru, Araki, Takashi, Imaizumi, Takahiro, Sumita, Yoko, Nakai, Michikazu, Tanaka, Akihito, Okumura, Takahiro, Butt, Jawad H., Petrie, Mark C., McMurray, John J.V., Murohara, Toyoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004
_version_ 1784900298567843840
author Kondo, Toru
Araki, Takashi
Imaizumi, Takahiro
Sumita, Yoko
Nakai, Michikazu
Tanaka, Akihito
Okumura, Takahiro
Butt, Jawad H.
Petrie, Mark C.
McMurray, John J.V.
Murohara, Toyoaki
author_facet Kondo, Toru
Araki, Takashi
Imaizumi, Takahiro
Sumita, Yoko
Nakai, Michikazu
Tanaka, Akihito
Okumura, Takahiro
Butt, Jawad H.
Petrie, Mark C.
McMurray, John J.V.
Murohara, Toyoaki
author_sort Kondo, Toru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortality. METHODS: This study used a nationwide Japanese database to identify patients receiving temporary MCS for CS between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of 65,837 patients, the cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 77.4%, heart failure (HF) in 10.9%, valvular disease in 2.7%, fulminant myocarditis (FM) in 2.5%, arrhythmia in 4.5%, and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2.0% of cases. The most commonly used MCS was an intra-aortic balloon pump alone in AMI (79.2%) and in HF (79.0%) and in valvular disease (66.0%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump in FM (56.2%) and arrhythmia (43.3%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone in PE (71.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 32.4%; 30.0% in AMI, 32.6% in HF, 33.1% in valvular disease, 34.2% in FM, 60.9% in arrhythmia, and 59.2% in PE. Overall in-hospital mortality increased from 30.4% in 2012 to 34.1% in 2019. After adjustment, valvular disease, FM, and PE had lower in-hospital mortality than AMI: valvular disease, OR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.50-0.64); FM: OR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66); PE: OR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56); whereas HF had similar in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: In a Japanese national registry of patients with CS, different causes of CS were associated with different types of MCS and differences in survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9982290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99822902023-03-04 Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Kondo, Toru Araki, Takashi Imaizumi, Takahiro Sumita, Yoko Nakai, Michikazu Tanaka, Akihito Okumura, Takahiro Butt, Jawad H. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. Murohara, Toyoaki JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortality. METHODS: This study used a nationwide Japanese database to identify patients receiving temporary MCS for CS between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of 65,837 patients, the cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 77.4%, heart failure (HF) in 10.9%, valvular disease in 2.7%, fulminant myocarditis (FM) in 2.5%, arrhythmia in 4.5%, and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2.0% of cases. The most commonly used MCS was an intra-aortic balloon pump alone in AMI (79.2%) and in HF (79.0%) and in valvular disease (66.0%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump in FM (56.2%) and arrhythmia (43.3%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone in PE (71.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 32.4%; 30.0% in AMI, 32.6% in HF, 33.1% in valvular disease, 34.2% in FM, 60.9% in arrhythmia, and 59.2% in PE. Overall in-hospital mortality increased from 30.4% in 2012 to 34.1% in 2019. After adjustment, valvular disease, FM, and PE had lower in-hospital mortality than AMI: valvular disease, OR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.50-0.64); FM: OR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66); PE: OR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56); whereas HF had similar in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: In a Japanese national registry of patients with CS, different causes of CS were associated with different types of MCS and differences in survival. Elsevier 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9982290/ /pubmed/36873766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kondo, Toru
Araki, Takashi
Imaizumi, Takahiro
Sumita, Yoko
Nakai, Michikazu
Tanaka, Akihito
Okumura, Takahiro
Butt, Jawad H.
Petrie, Mark C.
McMurray, John J.V.
Murohara, Toyoaki
Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
title Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_full Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_fullStr Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_short Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
title_sort prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock who received temporary mechanical circulatory support
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kondotoru prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT arakitakashi prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT imaizumitakahiro prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT sumitayoko prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT nakaimichikazu prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT tanakaakihito prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT okumuratakahiro prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT buttjawadh prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT petriemarkc prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT mcmurrayjohnjv prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT muroharatoyoaki prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport