Cargando…
Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortali...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004 |
_version_ | 1784900298567843840 |
---|---|
author | Kondo, Toru Araki, Takashi Imaizumi, Takahiro Sumita, Yoko Nakai, Michikazu Tanaka, Akihito Okumura, Takahiro Butt, Jawad H. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. Murohara, Toyoaki |
author_facet | Kondo, Toru Araki, Takashi Imaizumi, Takahiro Sumita, Yoko Nakai, Michikazu Tanaka, Akihito Okumura, Takahiro Butt, Jawad H. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. Murohara, Toyoaki |
author_sort | Kondo, Toru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortality. METHODS: This study used a nationwide Japanese database to identify patients receiving temporary MCS for CS between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of 65,837 patients, the cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 77.4%, heart failure (HF) in 10.9%, valvular disease in 2.7%, fulminant myocarditis (FM) in 2.5%, arrhythmia in 4.5%, and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2.0% of cases. The most commonly used MCS was an intra-aortic balloon pump alone in AMI (79.2%) and in HF (79.0%) and in valvular disease (66.0%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump in FM (56.2%) and arrhythmia (43.3%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone in PE (71.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 32.4%; 30.0% in AMI, 32.6% in HF, 33.1% in valvular disease, 34.2% in FM, 60.9% in arrhythmia, and 59.2% in PE. Overall in-hospital mortality increased from 30.4% in 2012 to 34.1% in 2019. After adjustment, valvular disease, FM, and PE had lower in-hospital mortality than AMI: valvular disease, OR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.50-0.64); FM: OR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66); PE: OR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56); whereas HF had similar in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: In a Japanese national registry of patients with CS, different causes of CS were associated with different types of MCS and differences in survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9982290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99822902023-03-04 Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Kondo, Toru Araki, Takashi Imaizumi, Takahiro Sumita, Yoko Nakai, Michikazu Tanaka, Akihito Okumura, Takahiro Butt, Jawad H. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. Murohara, Toyoaki JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortality. METHODS: This study used a nationwide Japanese database to identify patients receiving temporary MCS for CS between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of 65,837 patients, the cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 77.4%, heart failure (HF) in 10.9%, valvular disease in 2.7%, fulminant myocarditis (FM) in 2.5%, arrhythmia in 4.5%, and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2.0% of cases. The most commonly used MCS was an intra-aortic balloon pump alone in AMI (79.2%) and in HF (79.0%) and in valvular disease (66.0%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump in FM (56.2%) and arrhythmia (43.3%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone in PE (71.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 32.4%; 30.0% in AMI, 32.6% in HF, 33.1% in valvular disease, 34.2% in FM, 60.9% in arrhythmia, and 59.2% in PE. Overall in-hospital mortality increased from 30.4% in 2012 to 34.1% in 2019. After adjustment, valvular disease, FM, and PE had lower in-hospital mortality than AMI: valvular disease, OR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.50-0.64); FM: OR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66); PE: OR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56); whereas HF had similar in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: In a Japanese national registry of patients with CS, different causes of CS were associated with different types of MCS and differences in survival. Elsevier 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9982290/ /pubmed/36873766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kondo, Toru Araki, Takashi Imaizumi, Takahiro Sumita, Yoko Nakai, Michikazu Tanaka, Akihito Okumura, Takahiro Butt, Jawad H. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. Murohara, Toyoaki Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title | Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_full | Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_fullStr | Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_short | Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support |
title_sort | prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock who received temporary mechanical circulatory support |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kondotoru prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT arakitakashi prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT imaizumitakahiro prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT sumitayoko prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT nakaimichikazu prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT tanakaakihito prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT okumuratakahiro prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT buttjawadh prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT petriemarkc prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT mcmurrayjohnjv prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport AT muroharatoyoaki prognosisinpatientswithcardiogenicshockwhoreceivedtemporarymechanicalcirculatorysupport |