Cargando…

Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer

Local treatment of the axilla in clinically node-negative (cN0) early breast cancer patients with routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is debated after publication of ACOSOG Z0011 data in 2010. Currently, prospective randomized surgical trials investigating the omission of SLNB in upfront breas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Reimer, Toralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.002
_version_ 1784900304725082112
author Reimer, Toralf
author_facet Reimer, Toralf
author_sort Reimer, Toralf
collection PubMed
description Local treatment of the axilla in clinically node-negative (cN0) early breast cancer patients with routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is debated after publication of ACOSOG Z0011 data in 2010. Currently, prospective randomized surgical trials investigating the omission of SLNB in upfront breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and in the neoadjuvant setting, respectively. Several prospective randomized trials (SOUND, INSEMA, BOOG 2013–08, and NAUTILUS) with axillary observation alone versus SLNB in cN0 patients and primary BCS have primary objectives to evaluate oncologic safety when omitting SLNB. The Italian SOUND trial was the earliest to open in 2012 and has completed accrual in 2017. First oncologic outcome data are expected soon for SOUND and at the end of 2024 for INSEMA. Improvements in systemic treatments for breast cancer have increased the rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), offering the opportunity to de-escalate surgery in patients who have a pCR. Two prospective single-arm trials (EUBREAST-01, ASICS) include only patients with the highest likelihood of having a pCR after NAST (triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer) and type of surgery will be defined according to the response to NAST rather than on the classical T and N status. The ongoing trials will hopefully help us to understand whether we might take the best therapeutic decisions without the pathologic evaluation of nodal status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9982316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99823162023-03-04 Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer Reimer, Toralf Breast Article(s) from the Special Issue on: De-escalation of loco-regional treatment; Edited by Oreste Gentilini, Philip Poortmans, Maria João Cardoso, Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka Local treatment of the axilla in clinically node-negative (cN0) early breast cancer patients with routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is debated after publication of ACOSOG Z0011 data in 2010. Currently, prospective randomized surgical trials investigating the omission of SLNB in upfront breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and in the neoadjuvant setting, respectively. Several prospective randomized trials (SOUND, INSEMA, BOOG 2013–08, and NAUTILUS) with axillary observation alone versus SLNB in cN0 patients and primary BCS have primary objectives to evaluate oncologic safety when omitting SLNB. The Italian SOUND trial was the earliest to open in 2012 and has completed accrual in 2017. First oncologic outcome data are expected soon for SOUND and at the end of 2024 for INSEMA. Improvements in systemic treatments for breast cancer have increased the rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), offering the opportunity to de-escalate surgery in patients who have a pCR. Two prospective single-arm trials (EUBREAST-01, ASICS) include only patients with the highest likelihood of having a pCR after NAST (triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer) and type of surgery will be defined according to the response to NAST rather than on the classical T and N status. The ongoing trials will hopefully help us to understand whether we might take the best therapeutic decisions without the pathologic evaluation of nodal status. Elsevier 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9982316/ /pubmed/36658052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.002 Text en © 2023 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article(s) from the Special Issue on: De-escalation of loco-regional treatment; Edited by Oreste Gentilini, Philip Poortmans, Maria João Cardoso, Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka
Reimer, Toralf
Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
title Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
title_full Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
title_fullStr Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
title_short Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
title_sort omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer
topic Article(s) from the Special Issue on: De-escalation of loco-regional treatment; Edited by Oreste Gentilini, Philip Poortmans, Maria João Cardoso, Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT reimertoralf omissionofaxillarysentinellymphnodebiopsyinearlyinvasivebreastcancer