Cargando…
An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
BACKGROUND: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS). INTERVENTION: A national-level laboratory network...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844 |
_version_ | 1784900342957211648 |
---|---|
author | Kploanyi, Emma E. Kenu, Joseph Atsu, Benedicta K. Opare, David A. Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin Schroeder, Lee F. Dowdy, David W. Yawson, Alfred E. Kenu, Ernest |
author_facet | Kploanyi, Emma E. Kenu, Joseph Atsu, Benedicta K. Opare, David A. Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin Schroeder, Lee F. Dowdy, David W. Yawson, Alfred E. Kenu, Ernest |
author_sort | Kploanyi, Emma E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS). INTERVENTION: A national-level laboratory network survey was conducted among stakeholders of the Ghanaian laboratory network in Accra. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from December 2019 to January 2020, with follow-up phone interviews between June and July 2020. Also, we reviewed supporting documents provided by stakeholders for supplementary information and transcribed these to identify themes. Where possible, we completed the Laboratory Network scorecard using data obtained from the ATLAS. LESSONS LEARNT: The Laboratory Network (LABNET) scorecard assessment was a valuable addition to the ATLAS survey as it quantified the functionality of the laboratory network and its overall advancement toward achieving International Health Regulations (2005) and Global Health Security Agenda targets. Two significant challenges indicated by respondents were laboratory financing and delayed implementation of the Ghana National Health Laboratory Policy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Stakeholders recommended a review of the country’s funding landscape, such as funding laboratory services from the country’s internally generated funds. Also, they recommended laboratory policy implementation to ensure adequate laboratory workforce and standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9982496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99824962023-03-04 An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) Kploanyi, Emma E. Kenu, Joseph Atsu, Benedicta K. Opare, David A. Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin Schroeder, Lee F. Dowdy, David W. Yawson, Alfred E. Kenu, Ernest Afr J Lab Med Lessons from the Field BACKGROUND: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS). INTERVENTION: A national-level laboratory network survey was conducted among stakeholders of the Ghanaian laboratory network in Accra. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from December 2019 to January 2020, with follow-up phone interviews between June and July 2020. Also, we reviewed supporting documents provided by stakeholders for supplementary information and transcribed these to identify themes. Where possible, we completed the Laboratory Network scorecard using data obtained from the ATLAS. LESSONS LEARNT: The Laboratory Network (LABNET) scorecard assessment was a valuable addition to the ATLAS survey as it quantified the functionality of the laboratory network and its overall advancement toward achieving International Health Regulations (2005) and Global Health Security Agenda targets. Two significant challenges indicated by respondents were laboratory financing and delayed implementation of the Ghana National Health Laboratory Policy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Stakeholders recommended a review of the country’s funding landscape, such as funding laboratory services from the country’s internally generated funds. Also, they recommended laboratory policy implementation to ensure adequate laboratory workforce and standards. AOSIS 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9982496/ /pubmed/36873292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Lessons from the Field Kploanyi, Emma E. Kenu, Joseph Atsu, Benedicta K. Opare, David A. Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin Schroeder, Lee F. Dowdy, David W. Yawson, Alfred E. Kenu, Ernest An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) |
title | An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) |
title_full | An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) |
title_fullStr | An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) |
title_full_unstemmed | An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) |
title_short | An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) |
title_sort | assessment of the laboratory network in ghana: a national-level atlas survey (2019–2020) |
topic | Lessons from the Field |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kploanyiemmae anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT kenujoseph anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT atsubenedictak anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT oparedavida anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT asiedubekoefranklin anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT schroederleef anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT dowdydavidw anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT yawsonalfrede anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT kenuernest anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT kploanyiemmae assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT kenujoseph assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT atsubenedictak assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT oparedavida assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT asiedubekoefranklin assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT schroederleef assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT dowdydavidw assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT yawsonalfrede assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 AT kenuernest assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020 |