Cargando…

An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)

BACKGROUND: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS). INTERVENTION: A national-level laboratory network...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kploanyi, Emma E., Kenu, Joseph, Atsu, Benedicta K., Opare, David A., Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin, Schroeder, Lee F., Dowdy, David W., Yawson, Alfred E., Kenu, Ernest
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873292
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844
_version_ 1784900342957211648
author Kploanyi, Emma E.
Kenu, Joseph
Atsu, Benedicta K.
Opare, David A.
Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin
Schroeder, Lee F.
Dowdy, David W.
Yawson, Alfred E.
Kenu, Ernest
author_facet Kploanyi, Emma E.
Kenu, Joseph
Atsu, Benedicta K.
Opare, David A.
Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin
Schroeder, Lee F.
Dowdy, David W.
Yawson, Alfred E.
Kenu, Ernest
author_sort Kploanyi, Emma E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS). INTERVENTION: A national-level laboratory network survey was conducted among stakeholders of the Ghanaian laboratory network in Accra. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from December 2019 to January 2020, with follow-up phone interviews between June and July 2020. Also, we reviewed supporting documents provided by stakeholders for supplementary information and transcribed these to identify themes. Where possible, we completed the Laboratory Network scorecard using data obtained from the ATLAS. LESSONS LEARNT: The Laboratory Network (LABNET) scorecard assessment was a valuable addition to the ATLAS survey as it quantified the functionality of the laboratory network and its overall advancement toward achieving International Health Regulations (2005) and Global Health Security Agenda targets. Two significant challenges indicated by respondents were laboratory financing and delayed implementation of the Ghana National Health Laboratory Policy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Stakeholders recommended a review of the country’s funding landscape, such as funding laboratory services from the country’s internally generated funds. Also, they recommended laboratory policy implementation to ensure adequate laboratory workforce and standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9982496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99824962023-03-04 An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020) Kploanyi, Emma E. Kenu, Joseph Atsu, Benedicta K. Opare, David A. Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin Schroeder, Lee F. Dowdy, David W. Yawson, Alfred E. Kenu, Ernest Afr J Lab Med Lessons from the Field BACKGROUND: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS). INTERVENTION: A national-level laboratory network survey was conducted among stakeholders of the Ghanaian laboratory network in Accra. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from December 2019 to January 2020, with follow-up phone interviews between June and July 2020. Also, we reviewed supporting documents provided by stakeholders for supplementary information and transcribed these to identify themes. Where possible, we completed the Laboratory Network scorecard using data obtained from the ATLAS. LESSONS LEARNT: The Laboratory Network (LABNET) scorecard assessment was a valuable addition to the ATLAS survey as it quantified the functionality of the laboratory network and its overall advancement toward achieving International Health Regulations (2005) and Global Health Security Agenda targets. Two significant challenges indicated by respondents were laboratory financing and delayed implementation of the Ghana National Health Laboratory Policy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Stakeholders recommended a review of the country’s funding landscape, such as funding laboratory services from the country’s internally generated funds. Also, they recommended laboratory policy implementation to ensure adequate laboratory workforce and standards. AOSIS 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9982496/ /pubmed/36873292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Lessons from the Field
Kploanyi, Emma E.
Kenu, Joseph
Atsu, Benedicta K.
Opare, David A.
Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin
Schroeder, Lee F.
Dowdy, David W.
Yawson, Alfred E.
Kenu, Ernest
An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
title An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
title_full An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
title_fullStr An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
title_short An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019–2020)
title_sort assessment of the laboratory network in ghana: a national-level atlas survey (2019–2020)
topic Lessons from the Field
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873292
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844
work_keys_str_mv AT kploanyiemmae anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT kenujoseph anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT atsubenedictak anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT oparedavida anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT asiedubekoefranklin anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT schroederleef anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT dowdydavidw anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT yawsonalfrede anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT kenuernest anassessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT kploanyiemmae assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT kenujoseph assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT atsubenedictak assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT oparedavida assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT asiedubekoefranklin assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT schroederleef assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT dowdydavidw assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT yawsonalfrede assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020
AT kenuernest assessmentofthelaboratorynetworkinghanaanationallevelatlassurvey20192020