Cargando…

Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US

IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) is endorsed by clinical guidelines as the preferred management strategy for low-risk prostate cancer, but its use in contemporary clinical practice remains incompletely defined. OBJECTIVE: To characterize trends over time and practice- and practitioner-level vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooperberg, Matthew R., Meeks, William, Fang, Raymond, Gaylis, Franklin D., Catalona, William J., Makarov, Danil V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439
_version_ 1784900380887351296
author Cooperberg, Matthew R.
Meeks, William
Fang, Raymond
Gaylis, Franklin D.
Catalona, William J.
Makarov, Danil V.
author_facet Cooperberg, Matthew R.
Meeks, William
Fang, Raymond
Gaylis, Franklin D.
Catalona, William J.
Makarov, Danil V.
author_sort Cooperberg, Matthew R.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) is endorsed by clinical guidelines as the preferred management strategy for low-risk prostate cancer, but its use in contemporary clinical practice remains incompletely defined. OBJECTIVE: To characterize trends over time and practice- and practitioner-level variation in the use of AS in a large, national disease registry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study included men with low-risk prostate cancer, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason grade group 1, and clinical stage T1c or T2a, newly diagnosed between January 1, 2014, and June 1, 2021. Patients were identified in the American Urological Association (AUA) Quality (AQUA) Registry, a large quality reporting registry including data from 1945 urology practitioners at 349 practices across 48 US states and territories, comprising more than 8.5 million unique patients. Data are collected automatically from electronic health record systems at participating practices. EXPOSURES: Exposures of interest included patient age, race, and PSA level, as well as urology practice and individual urology practitioners. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome of interest was the use of AS as primary treatment. Treatment was determined through analysis of electronic health record structured and unstructured clinical data and determination of surveillance based on follow-up testing with at least 1 PSA level remaining greater than 1.0 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 20 809 patients in AQUA were diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer and had known primary treatment. The median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years; 31 (0.1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native; 148 (0.7%) were Asian or Pacific Islander; 1855 (8.9%) were Black; 8351 (40.1%) were White; 169 (0.8%) were of other race or ethnicity; and 10 255 (49.3%) were missing information on race or ethnicity. Rates of AS increased sharply and consistently from 26.5% in 2014 to 59.6% in 2021. However, use of AS varied from 4.0% to 78.0% at the urology practice level and from 0% to 100% at the practitioner level. On multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis was the variable most strongly associated with AS; age, race, and PSA value at diagnosis were all also associated with odds of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study of AS rates in the AQUA Registry found that national, community-based rates of AS have increased but remain suboptimal, and wide variation persists across practices and practitioners. Continued progress on this critical quality indicator is essential to minimize overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer and by extension to improve the benefit-to-harm ratio of national prostate cancer early detection efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9982696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99826962023-03-04 Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US Cooperberg, Matthew R. Meeks, William Fang, Raymond Gaylis, Franklin D. Catalona, William J. Makarov, Danil V. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) is endorsed by clinical guidelines as the preferred management strategy for low-risk prostate cancer, but its use in contemporary clinical practice remains incompletely defined. OBJECTIVE: To characterize trends over time and practice- and practitioner-level variation in the use of AS in a large, national disease registry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study included men with low-risk prostate cancer, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason grade group 1, and clinical stage T1c or T2a, newly diagnosed between January 1, 2014, and June 1, 2021. Patients were identified in the American Urological Association (AUA) Quality (AQUA) Registry, a large quality reporting registry including data from 1945 urology practitioners at 349 practices across 48 US states and territories, comprising more than 8.5 million unique patients. Data are collected automatically from electronic health record systems at participating practices. EXPOSURES: Exposures of interest included patient age, race, and PSA level, as well as urology practice and individual urology practitioners. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome of interest was the use of AS as primary treatment. Treatment was determined through analysis of electronic health record structured and unstructured clinical data and determination of surveillance based on follow-up testing with at least 1 PSA level remaining greater than 1.0 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 20 809 patients in AQUA were diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer and had known primary treatment. The median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years; 31 (0.1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native; 148 (0.7%) were Asian or Pacific Islander; 1855 (8.9%) were Black; 8351 (40.1%) were White; 169 (0.8%) were of other race or ethnicity; and 10 255 (49.3%) were missing information on race or ethnicity. Rates of AS increased sharply and consistently from 26.5% in 2014 to 59.6% in 2021. However, use of AS varied from 4.0% to 78.0% at the urology practice level and from 0% to 100% at the practitioner level. On multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis was the variable most strongly associated with AS; age, race, and PSA value at diagnosis were all also associated with odds of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study of AS rates in the AQUA Registry found that national, community-based rates of AS have increased but remain suboptimal, and wide variation persists across practices and practitioners. Continued progress on this critical quality indicator is essential to minimize overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer and by extension to improve the benefit-to-harm ratio of national prostate cancer early detection efforts. American Medical Association 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9982696/ /pubmed/36862409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439 Text en Copyright 2023 Cooperberg MR et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Cooperberg, Matthew R.
Meeks, William
Fang, Raymond
Gaylis, Franklin D.
Catalona, William J.
Makarov, Danil V.
Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US
title Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US
title_full Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US
title_fullStr Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US
title_full_unstemmed Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US
title_short Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US
title_sort time trends and variation in the use of active surveillance for management of low-risk prostate cancer in the us
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperbergmatthewr timetrendsandvariationintheuseofactivesurveillanceformanagementoflowriskprostatecancerintheus
AT meekswilliam timetrendsandvariationintheuseofactivesurveillanceformanagementoflowriskprostatecancerintheus
AT fangraymond timetrendsandvariationintheuseofactivesurveillanceformanagementoflowriskprostatecancerintheus
AT gaylisfranklind timetrendsandvariationintheuseofactivesurveillanceformanagementoflowriskprostatecancerintheus
AT catalonawilliamj timetrendsandvariationintheuseofactivesurveillanceformanagementoflowriskprostatecancerintheus
AT makarovdanilv timetrendsandvariationintheuseofactivesurveillanceformanagementoflowriskprostatecancerintheus