Cargando…
The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis
BACKGROUND: We performed a secondary exploratory cluster analysis on the data collected from the validation phase of the study leading to the development of the model care pathway (CP) for Myasthenia Gravis (MG), in which a panel of 85 international experts were asked some characteristics about them...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09139-7 |
_version_ | 1784900485792137216 |
---|---|
author | Ratti, Matteo Milicia, Osvaldo Rescinito, Riccardo Coeckelberghs, Ellen Seys, Deborah Vanhaecht, Kris Panella, Massimiliano |
author_facet | Ratti, Matteo Milicia, Osvaldo Rescinito, Riccardo Coeckelberghs, Ellen Seys, Deborah Vanhaecht, Kris Panella, Massimiliano |
author_sort | Ratti, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We performed a secondary exploratory cluster analysis on the data collected from the validation phase of the study leading to the development of the model care pathway (CP) for Myasthenia Gravis (MG), in which a panel of 85 international experts were asked some characteristics about themselves and their opinion about the model CP. Our aim was to identify which characteristics of the experts play a role in the genesis of their opinion. METHODS: We extracted the questions probing an opinion and those describing a characteristic of the expert from the original questionnaire. We performed a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and a subsequent hierarchical clustering on principal component (HCPC) on the opinion variables, integrating the characteristic variables as supplementary (predicted). RESULTS: After reducing the dimensionality of the questionnaire to three dimensions we noticed that the not-appropriateness judgement of the clinical activities may overlap with the completeness one. From the HCPC it seems that the working setting of the expert may play a crucial role in determining the opinion about the setting of the sub-processes of MG: shifting from a cluster where the experts do not work in sub-specialist settings to one where the experts are working in them, the opinion changes accordingly from a mono-disciplinary setting to a multi-disciplinary one. Another interesting result is that the experience in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) measured in years and the expert typology (whether general neurologist or NMD expert) seem not to contribute significantly to the opinions. CONCLUSIONS: These findings might indicate a poor ability of the expert to discriminate what is not appropriate from what is not complete. Also, the opinion of the expert might be influenced by the working setting, but not by the experience in NMD (as measured in years). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09139-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9983158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99831582023-03-04 The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis Ratti, Matteo Milicia, Osvaldo Rescinito, Riccardo Coeckelberghs, Ellen Seys, Deborah Vanhaecht, Kris Panella, Massimiliano BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: We performed a secondary exploratory cluster analysis on the data collected from the validation phase of the study leading to the development of the model care pathway (CP) for Myasthenia Gravis (MG), in which a panel of 85 international experts were asked some characteristics about themselves and their opinion about the model CP. Our aim was to identify which characteristics of the experts play a role in the genesis of their opinion. METHODS: We extracted the questions probing an opinion and those describing a characteristic of the expert from the original questionnaire. We performed a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and a subsequent hierarchical clustering on principal component (HCPC) on the opinion variables, integrating the characteristic variables as supplementary (predicted). RESULTS: After reducing the dimensionality of the questionnaire to three dimensions we noticed that the not-appropriateness judgement of the clinical activities may overlap with the completeness one. From the HCPC it seems that the working setting of the expert may play a crucial role in determining the opinion about the setting of the sub-processes of MG: shifting from a cluster where the experts do not work in sub-specialist settings to one where the experts are working in them, the opinion changes accordingly from a mono-disciplinary setting to a multi-disciplinary one. Another interesting result is that the experience in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) measured in years and the expert typology (whether general neurologist or NMD expert) seem not to contribute significantly to the opinions. CONCLUSIONS: These findings might indicate a poor ability of the expert to discriminate what is not appropriate from what is not complete. Also, the opinion of the expert might be influenced by the working setting, but not by the experience in NMD (as measured in years). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09139-7. BioMed Central 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9983158/ /pubmed/36869326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09139-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ratti, Matteo Milicia, Osvaldo Rescinito, Riccardo Coeckelberghs, Ellen Seys, Deborah Vanhaecht, Kris Panella, Massimiliano The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
title | The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
title_full | The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
title_fullStr | The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
title_short | The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
title_sort | determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09139-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rattimatteo thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT miliciaosvaldo thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT rescinitoriccardo thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT coeckelberghsellen thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT seysdeborah thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT vanhaechtkris thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT panellamassimiliano thedeterminantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT rattimatteo determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT miliciaosvaldo determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT rescinitoriccardo determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT coeckelberghsellen determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT seysdeborah determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT vanhaechtkris determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis AT panellamassimiliano determinantsofexpertopinioninthedevelopmentofcarepathwaysinsightsfromanexploratoryclusteranalysis |