Cargando…

Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic swelling causes a delay in surgery, a prolonged hospital stay and a higher risk of complications. Thus, soft tissue conditioning following complex ankle fractures is of central importance in their perioperative management. Since the clinical benefit of VIT usage on the cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Barbari, Jan S., Schnetzke, Marc, Swartman, Benedict, Grützner, Paul A., Franke, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03587-x
_version_ 1784900493904969728
author El Barbari, Jan S.
Schnetzke, Marc
Swartman, Benedict
Grützner, Paul A.
Franke, Jochen
author_facet El Barbari, Jan S.
Schnetzke, Marc
Swartman, Benedict
Grützner, Paul A.
Franke, Jochen
author_sort El Barbari, Jan S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic swelling causes a delay in surgery, a prolonged hospital stay and a higher risk of complications. Thus, soft tissue conditioning following complex ankle fractures is of central importance in their perioperative management. Since the clinical benefit of VIT usage on the clinical course has been shown, it should now be investigated whether it is also cost-efficient in doing so. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included are published clinical results of the prospective, randomised, controlled, monocentric VIT study that have proven the therapeutic benefit in complex ankle fractures. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio into the intervention group (VIT) and the control group (elevation). In this study, the required economic parameters of these clinical cases were collected on the data of the financial accounting and an estimation of annual cases had been performed to extrapolate the cost-efficiency of this therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean savings (in €). RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases were studied in the period from 2016 to 2018. There was no difference in the generated revenue. However, due to lower incurred costs in the intervention group, there were potential savings of about €2000 (p(ITT) = 0.073) to 3000 (p(AT) = 0.008) per patient compared to the control group with therapy costs decreasing as the number of patients treated increases from €1400 in one case to below €200 per patient in 10 cases. There were 20% more revision surgeries in the control group or 50 min more OR time, respectively, and an increased attendance by staff and medical personnel of more than 7 h. CONCLUSIONS: VIT therapy has been shown to be a beneficial therapeutic modality, but it is so not only in regard to soft-tissue conditioning but also cost efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9983194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99831942023-03-04 Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial El Barbari, Jan S. Schnetzke, Marc Swartman, Benedict Grützner, Paul A. Franke, Jochen J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic swelling causes a delay in surgery, a prolonged hospital stay and a higher risk of complications. Thus, soft tissue conditioning following complex ankle fractures is of central importance in their perioperative management. Since the clinical benefit of VIT usage on the clinical course has been shown, it should now be investigated whether it is also cost-efficient in doing so. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included are published clinical results of the prospective, randomised, controlled, monocentric VIT study that have proven the therapeutic benefit in complex ankle fractures. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio into the intervention group (VIT) and the control group (elevation). In this study, the required economic parameters of these clinical cases were collected on the data of the financial accounting and an estimation of annual cases had been performed to extrapolate the cost-efficiency of this therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean savings (in €). RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases were studied in the period from 2016 to 2018. There was no difference in the generated revenue. However, due to lower incurred costs in the intervention group, there were potential savings of about €2000 (p(ITT) = 0.073) to 3000 (p(AT) = 0.008) per patient compared to the control group with therapy costs decreasing as the number of patients treated increases from €1400 in one case to below €200 per patient in 10 cases. There were 20% more revision surgeries in the control group or 50 min more OR time, respectively, and an increased attendance by staff and medical personnel of more than 7 h. CONCLUSIONS: VIT therapy has been shown to be a beneficial therapeutic modality, but it is so not only in regard to soft-tissue conditioning but also cost efficiency. BioMed Central 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9983194/ /pubmed/36864448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03587-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
El Barbari, Jan S.
Schnetzke, Marc
Swartman, Benedict
Grützner, Paul A.
Franke, Jochen
Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
title Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_short Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_sort analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (vit) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03587-x
work_keys_str_mv AT elbarbarijans analysisofthecostefficiencyofthevascularimpulsetechnologyvitintheperioperativemanagementofcomplexanklefracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schnetzkemarc analysisofthecostefficiencyofthevascularimpulsetechnologyvitintheperioperativemanagementofcomplexanklefracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT swartmanbenedict analysisofthecostefficiencyofthevascularimpulsetechnologyvitintheperioperativemanagementofcomplexanklefracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grutznerpaula analysisofthecostefficiencyofthevascularimpulsetechnologyvitintheperioperativemanagementofcomplexanklefracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT frankejochen analysisofthecostefficiencyofthevascularimpulsetechnologyvitintheperioperativemanagementofcomplexanklefracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial