Cargando…

Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly used for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, transvenous (TV) and subcutaneous (S) ICDs are the two different types used. Preservation of central venous vasculature, no risk of vascular or myoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Zahid, Sethumadhavan, Dinesh, Rayner, Tom, Kyaw, Sithu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874347
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34492
_version_ 1784900514089009152
author Khan, Zahid
Sethumadhavan, Dinesh
Rayner, Tom
Kyaw, Sithu
author_facet Khan, Zahid
Sethumadhavan, Dinesh
Rayner, Tom
Kyaw, Sithu
author_sort Khan, Zahid
collection PubMed
description Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly used for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, transvenous (TV) and subcutaneous (S) ICDs are the two different types used. Preservation of central venous vasculature, no risk of vascular or myocardial injury during implant, easier explantation, and lower risk of systemic infections have driven the increased use of S-ICDs. The shocks delivered by ICDs for non-life-threatening arrhythmias or because of oversensing T waves or noise are known as inappropriate shocks. Here, we present the case of a 33-year-old man who had an S-ICD implanted in 2019 for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. He had a TV-ICD implanted in 2010 which was explanted in 2013 due to infective endocarditis, and the patient underwent a mechanical mitral valve replacement. He was at intermediate risk for SCD over the next five years. He had an S-ICD implanted in 2019 and had never received any shock before. Electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm, left axis deviation, QRS 110 ms, hyperacute T waves in inferior leads, and T-wave inversion in lateral leads. He then began experiencing inappropriate shocks three years after S-ICD placement due to a drop in R wave amplitude secondary to noise oversensing in October 2022. Despite reprogramming the device from the primary vector to an alternate vector, the patient had further inappropriate shocks two months later due to noise oversensing. The patient was discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting and the S-ICD was explanted according to the patient’s wishes and a loop recorder was implanted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9983290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99832902023-03-04 Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report Khan, Zahid Sethumadhavan, Dinesh Rayner, Tom Kyaw, Sithu Cureus Cardiology Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly used for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, transvenous (TV) and subcutaneous (S) ICDs are the two different types used. Preservation of central venous vasculature, no risk of vascular or myocardial injury during implant, easier explantation, and lower risk of systemic infections have driven the increased use of S-ICDs. The shocks delivered by ICDs for non-life-threatening arrhythmias or because of oversensing T waves or noise are known as inappropriate shocks. Here, we present the case of a 33-year-old man who had an S-ICD implanted in 2019 for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. He had a TV-ICD implanted in 2010 which was explanted in 2013 due to infective endocarditis, and the patient underwent a mechanical mitral valve replacement. He was at intermediate risk for SCD over the next five years. He had an S-ICD implanted in 2019 and had never received any shock before. Electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm, left axis deviation, QRS 110 ms, hyperacute T waves in inferior leads, and T-wave inversion in lateral leads. He then began experiencing inappropriate shocks three years after S-ICD placement due to a drop in R wave amplitude secondary to noise oversensing in October 2022. Despite reprogramming the device from the primary vector to an alternate vector, the patient had further inappropriate shocks two months later due to noise oversensing. The patient was discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting and the S-ICD was explanted according to the patient’s wishes and a loop recorder was implanted. Cureus 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9983290/ /pubmed/36874347 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34492 Text en Copyright © 2023, Khan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Khan, Zahid
Sethumadhavan, Dinesh
Rayner, Tom
Kyaw, Sithu
Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report
title Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report
title_full Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report
title_fullStr Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report
title_full_unstemmed Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report
title_short Inappropriate Shocks With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Young Patient: A Case Report
title_sort inappropriate shocks with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a young patient: a case report
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874347
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34492
work_keys_str_mv AT khanzahid inappropriateshockswithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinayoungpatientacasereport
AT sethumadhavandinesh inappropriateshockswithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinayoungpatientacasereport
AT raynertom inappropriateshockswithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinayoungpatientacasereport
AT kyawsithu inappropriateshockswithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinayoungpatientacasereport