Cargando…

Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction

In order to explore the proteomic signatures of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) related to the mechanism of heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a comprehensive proteomic analysis of EAT was ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Qian, He, Shan, Peng, Yuanshu, Su, Pixiong, Zhao, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17695
_version_ 1784900518001246208
author Gao, Qian
He, Shan
Peng, Yuanshu
Su, Pixiong
Zhao, Lei
author_facet Gao, Qian
He, Shan
Peng, Yuanshu
Su, Pixiong
Zhao, Lei
author_sort Gao, Qian
collection PubMed
description In order to explore the proteomic signatures of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) related to the mechanism of heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a comprehensive proteomic analysis of EAT was made in HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 5) and HFpEF (n = 5) patients with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry experiments. The selected differential proteins were verified between HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 20) and HFpEF (n = 40) by ELISA (enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay). A total of 599 EAT proteins were significantly different in expression between HFrEF/HFmrEF and HFpEF. Among the 599 proteins, 58 proteins increased in HFrEF/HFmrEF compared to HFpEF, whereas 541 proteins decreased in HFrEF/HFmrEF. Of these proteins, TGM2 in EAT was down‐regulated in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients and was confirmed to decrease in circulating plasma of the HFrEF/HFmrEF group (p = 0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed plasma TGM2 could be an independent predictor of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.033). Receiver operating curve analysis indicated that the combination of TGM2 and Gensini score improved the diagnostic value of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.002). In summary, for the first time, we described the proteome in EAT in both HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF and identified a comprehensive dimension of potential targets for the mechanism behind the EF spectrum. Exploring the role of EAT may offer potential targets for preventive intervention of HF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9983313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99833132023-03-04 Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction Gao, Qian He, Shan Peng, Yuanshu Su, Pixiong Zhao, Lei J Cell Mol Med Original Articles In order to explore the proteomic signatures of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) related to the mechanism of heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a comprehensive proteomic analysis of EAT was made in HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 5) and HFpEF (n = 5) patients with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry experiments. The selected differential proteins were verified between HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 20) and HFpEF (n = 40) by ELISA (enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay). A total of 599 EAT proteins were significantly different in expression between HFrEF/HFmrEF and HFpEF. Among the 599 proteins, 58 proteins increased in HFrEF/HFmrEF compared to HFpEF, whereas 541 proteins decreased in HFrEF/HFmrEF. Of these proteins, TGM2 in EAT was down‐regulated in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients and was confirmed to decrease in circulating plasma of the HFrEF/HFmrEF group (p = 0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed plasma TGM2 could be an independent predictor of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.033). Receiver operating curve analysis indicated that the combination of TGM2 and Gensini score improved the diagnostic value of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.002). In summary, for the first time, we described the proteome in EAT in both HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF and identified a comprehensive dimension of potential targets for the mechanism behind the EF spectrum. Exploring the role of EAT may offer potential targets for preventive intervention of HF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9983313/ /pubmed/36808702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17695 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gao, Qian
He, Shan
Peng, Yuanshu
Su, Pixiong
Zhao, Lei
Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
title Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
title_full Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
title_fullStr Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
title_short Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
title_sort proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17695
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoqian proteomicprofilingofepicardialfatinheartfailurewithpreservedversusreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfraction
AT heshan proteomicprofilingofepicardialfatinheartfailurewithpreservedversusreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfraction
AT pengyuanshu proteomicprofilingofepicardialfatinheartfailurewithpreservedversusreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfraction
AT supixiong proteomicprofilingofepicardialfatinheartfailurewithpreservedversusreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfraction
AT zhaolei proteomicprofilingofepicardialfatinheartfailurewithpreservedversusreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfraction