Cargando…

Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis

PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farid, Marjan, Ayres, Brandon D, Donnenfeld, Eric, Gaddie, Ian Benjamin, Gupta, Preeya K, Holland, Edward, Lindstrom, Richard, Pflugfelder, Stephen C, Karpecki, Paul M, Nichols, Kelly K, Starr, Christopher E, Yeu, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989
_version_ 1784900522407362560
author Farid, Marjan
Ayres, Brandon D
Donnenfeld, Eric
Gaddie, Ian Benjamin
Gupta, Preeya K
Holland, Edward
Lindstrom, Richard
Pflugfelder, Stephen C
Karpecki, Paul M
Nichols, Kelly K
Starr, Christopher E
Yeu, Elizabeth
author_facet Farid, Marjan
Ayres, Brandon D
Donnenfeld, Eric
Gaddie, Ian Benjamin
Gupta, Preeya K
Holland, Edward
Lindstrom, Richard
Pflugfelder, Stephen C
Karpecki, Paul M
Nichols, Kelly K
Starr, Christopher E
Yeu, Elizabeth
author_sort Farid, Marjan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7–9 and 1–3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed. RESULTS: The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2–9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7–9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7–9). CONCLUSION: Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9983333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99833332023-03-04 Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis Farid, Marjan Ayres, Brandon D Donnenfeld, Eric Gaddie, Ian Benjamin Gupta, Preeya K Holland, Edward Lindstrom, Richard Pflugfelder, Stephen C Karpecki, Paul M Nichols, Kelly K Starr, Christopher E Yeu, Elizabeth Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7–9 and 1–3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed. RESULTS: The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2–9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7–9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7–9). CONCLUSION: Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes. Dove 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9983333/ /pubmed/36875531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989 Text en © 2023 Farid et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Farid, Marjan
Ayres, Brandon D
Donnenfeld, Eric
Gaddie, Ian Benjamin
Gupta, Preeya K
Holland, Edward
Lindstrom, Richard
Pflugfelder, Stephen C
Karpecki, Paul M
Nichols, Kelly K
Starr, Christopher E
Yeu, Elizabeth
Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
title Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
title_full Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
title_fullStr Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
title_full_unstemmed Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
title_short Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
title_sort delphi panel consensus regarding current clinical practice management options for demodex blepharitis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989
work_keys_str_mv AT faridmarjan delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT ayresbrandond delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT donnenfelderic delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT gaddieianbenjamin delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT guptapreeyak delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT hollandedward delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT lindstromrichard delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT pflugfelderstephenc delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT karpeckipaulm delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT nicholskellyk delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT starrchristophere delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis
AT yeuelizabeth delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis