Cargando…
Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis
PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989 |
_version_ | 1784900522407362560 |
---|---|
author | Farid, Marjan Ayres, Brandon D Donnenfeld, Eric Gaddie, Ian Benjamin Gupta, Preeya K Holland, Edward Lindstrom, Richard Pflugfelder, Stephen C Karpecki, Paul M Nichols, Kelly K Starr, Christopher E Yeu, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Farid, Marjan Ayres, Brandon D Donnenfeld, Eric Gaddie, Ian Benjamin Gupta, Preeya K Holland, Edward Lindstrom, Richard Pflugfelder, Stephen C Karpecki, Paul M Nichols, Kelly K Starr, Christopher E Yeu, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Farid, Marjan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7–9 and 1–3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed. RESULTS: The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2–9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7–9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7–9). CONCLUSION: Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9983333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99833332023-03-04 Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis Farid, Marjan Ayres, Brandon D Donnenfeld, Eric Gaddie, Ian Benjamin Gupta, Preeya K Holland, Edward Lindstrom, Richard Pflugfelder, Stephen C Karpecki, Paul M Nichols, Kelly K Starr, Christopher E Yeu, Elizabeth Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7–9 and 1–3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed. RESULTS: The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2–9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7–9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7–9). CONCLUSION: Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes. Dove 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9983333/ /pubmed/36875531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989 Text en © 2023 Farid et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Farid, Marjan Ayres, Brandon D Donnenfeld, Eric Gaddie, Ian Benjamin Gupta, Preeya K Holland, Edward Lindstrom, Richard Pflugfelder, Stephen C Karpecki, Paul M Nichols, Kelly K Starr, Christopher E Yeu, Elizabeth Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis |
title | Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis |
title_full | Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis |
title_fullStr | Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis |
title_short | Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis |
title_sort | delphi panel consensus regarding current clinical practice management options for demodex blepharitis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faridmarjan delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT ayresbrandond delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT donnenfelderic delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT gaddieianbenjamin delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT guptapreeyak delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT hollandedward delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT lindstromrichard delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT pflugfelderstephenc delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT karpeckipaulm delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT nicholskellyk delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT starrchristophere delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis AT yeuelizabeth delphipanelconsensusregardingcurrentclinicalpracticemanagementoptionsfordemodexblepharitis |