Cargando…

Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

There are contradicting findings regarding the effect of thoracic spine manipulation in decreasing pain and disability in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Hence, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of thoracic spine thrust manipulation in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsegay, Gebrerufael Solomon, Gebregergs, Gebremedhin Berhe, Weleslassie, Gidey Gomera, Hailemariam, Teklehaimanot Tekle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875686
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368910
_version_ 1784900545888124928
author Tsegay, Gebrerufael Solomon
Gebregergs, Gebremedhin Berhe
Weleslassie, Gidey Gomera
Hailemariam, Teklehaimanot Tekle
author_facet Tsegay, Gebrerufael Solomon
Gebregergs, Gebremedhin Berhe
Weleslassie, Gidey Gomera
Hailemariam, Teklehaimanot Tekle
author_sort Tsegay, Gebrerufael Solomon
collection PubMed
description There are contradicting findings regarding the effect of thoracic spine manipulation in decreasing pain and disability in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Hence, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of thoracic spine thrust manipulation in decreasing pain intensity, and neck disability among subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain. We made a comprehensive search of literature published between 2010 and 2020 from the electronic databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). We adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The methodological quality was assessed by the PEDro scale, and the level of evidence rated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) software. Finally, a meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3 with a random-effects model to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals for pain and disability. Eight eligible randomized controlled trials were identified with a total of 457 participants. The quality assessment of the included studies was found to be fair in quality (mean PEDro score of 6.63/10). The overall GRADE of the review showed low to moderate level of evidence. Effect size estimates of the studies showed modest differences in pain reduction, as it revealed a significant effect in Visual Analog Scale ((VAS) 0–100mm) (MD −12.46; 95% CI: −17.29, −7.64), and Pain Numeric Rating Scale ((PNRS) 0–10 pts) (MD −0.8; 95% CI: −1.60, −0.10). The thoracic manipulation also resulted in a significant effect in decreasing neck disability, in which the mean difference in Neck disability index (NDI) showed (MD −6.46; 95% CI: −10.43 −2.50). This review suggested that thoracic spine manipulation was effective in reducing pain and neck disability in all adults with chronic mechanical neck pain compared to other interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9983435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99834352023-03-04 Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials Tsegay, Gebrerufael Solomon Gebregergs, Gebremedhin Berhe Weleslassie, Gidey Gomera Hailemariam, Teklehaimanot Tekle J Pain Res Review There are contradicting findings regarding the effect of thoracic spine manipulation in decreasing pain and disability in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Hence, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of thoracic spine thrust manipulation in decreasing pain intensity, and neck disability among subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain. We made a comprehensive search of literature published between 2010 and 2020 from the electronic databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). We adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The methodological quality was assessed by the PEDro scale, and the level of evidence rated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) software. Finally, a meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3 with a random-effects model to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals for pain and disability. Eight eligible randomized controlled trials were identified with a total of 457 participants. The quality assessment of the included studies was found to be fair in quality (mean PEDro score of 6.63/10). The overall GRADE of the review showed low to moderate level of evidence. Effect size estimates of the studies showed modest differences in pain reduction, as it revealed a significant effect in Visual Analog Scale ((VAS) 0–100mm) (MD −12.46; 95% CI: −17.29, −7.64), and Pain Numeric Rating Scale ((PNRS) 0–10 pts) (MD −0.8; 95% CI: −1.60, −0.10). The thoracic manipulation also resulted in a significant effect in decreasing neck disability, in which the mean difference in Neck disability index (NDI) showed (MD −6.46; 95% CI: −10.43 −2.50). This review suggested that thoracic spine manipulation was effective in reducing pain and neck disability in all adults with chronic mechanical neck pain compared to other interventions. Dove 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9983435/ /pubmed/36875686 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368910 Text en © 2023 Tsegay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Tsegay, Gebrerufael Solomon
Gebregergs, Gebremedhin Berhe
Weleslassie, Gidey Gomera
Hailemariam, Teklehaimanot Tekle
Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
title Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
title_full Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
title_short Effectiveness of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Management of Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
title_sort effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation on the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875686
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368910
work_keys_str_mv AT tsegaygebrerufaelsolomon effectivenessofthoracicspinemanipulationonthemanagementofneckpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontroltrials
AT gebregergsgebremedhinberhe effectivenessofthoracicspinemanipulationonthemanagementofneckpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontroltrials
AT weleslassiegideygomera effectivenessofthoracicspinemanipulationonthemanagementofneckpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontroltrials
AT hailemariamteklehaimanottekle effectivenessofthoracicspinemanipulationonthemanagementofneckpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontroltrials