Cargando…
The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: The widespread diagnostic and therapeutic application of bronchoscopy is often associated with complications like desaturation. This systematic review and meta-analysis intend to scrutinize whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is advantageous for providing respiratory support durin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36876212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24339 |
_version_ | 1784900594055512064 |
---|---|
author | Roy, Avishek Khanna, Puneet Chowdhury, Sumit Roy Haritha, Damarla Sarkar, Soumya |
author_facet | Roy, Avishek Khanna, Puneet Chowdhury, Sumit Roy Haritha, Damarla Sarkar, Soumya |
author_sort | Roy, Avishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The widespread diagnostic and therapeutic application of bronchoscopy is often associated with complications like desaturation. This systematic review and meta-analysis intend to scrutinize whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during bronchoscopic procedures under sedation, in comparison with other conventional modalities for oxygen therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough screening of electronic databases was done till 31st December 2021 after obtaining registration in PROSPERO (CRD42021245420). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), evaluating the impact of HFNC and standard/any other oxygen-delivery devices during bronchoscopy were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: We retrieved in nine RCTs, with a total of 1306 patients, the application of HFNC during bronchoscopy led to decreased number of desaturation spells [relative risk (RR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27–0.44, I(2) = 23%], higher nadir value of SpO(2) [Mean difference (MD) 4.30, 95% CI 2.41–6.19, I(2) = 96%], and improved PaO(2) from baseline (MD 21.77, 95% CI 2.8–40.74, I(2) = 99%), along with similar PaCO(2) values (MD –0.34, 95% CI –1.82 to 1.13, I(2) = 58%) just after the procedure. However, apart from desaturation spell, the findings are significantly heterogeneous. In subgroup analysis, HFNC had significantly lesser desaturation spells and better oxygenation than low-flow devices, but in comparison to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) had a lower nadir value of SpO(2) with no other significant difference. CONCLUSION: High-flow nasal cannula led to greater oxygenation and prevented desaturation spells more effectively in comparison with low-flow devices like nasal cannula, venturi mask, etc., and may be considered as an alternative to NIV during bronchoscopy in certain high-risk patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Roy A, Khanna P, Chowdhury SR, Haritha D, Sarkar S. The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(10):1131–1140. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9983664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99836642023-03-04 The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses Roy, Avishek Khanna, Puneet Chowdhury, Sumit Roy Haritha, Damarla Sarkar, Soumya Indian J Crit Care Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The widespread diagnostic and therapeutic application of bronchoscopy is often associated with complications like desaturation. This systematic review and meta-analysis intend to scrutinize whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is advantageous for providing respiratory support during bronchoscopic procedures under sedation, in comparison with other conventional modalities for oxygen therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough screening of electronic databases was done till 31st December 2021 after obtaining registration in PROSPERO (CRD42021245420). Randomized controlled trials (RCT), evaluating the impact of HFNC and standard/any other oxygen-delivery devices during bronchoscopy were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: We retrieved in nine RCTs, with a total of 1306 patients, the application of HFNC during bronchoscopy led to decreased number of desaturation spells [relative risk (RR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27–0.44, I(2) = 23%], higher nadir value of SpO(2) [Mean difference (MD) 4.30, 95% CI 2.41–6.19, I(2) = 96%], and improved PaO(2) from baseline (MD 21.77, 95% CI 2.8–40.74, I(2) = 99%), along with similar PaCO(2) values (MD –0.34, 95% CI –1.82 to 1.13, I(2) = 58%) just after the procedure. However, apart from desaturation spell, the findings are significantly heterogeneous. In subgroup analysis, HFNC had significantly lesser desaturation spells and better oxygenation than low-flow devices, but in comparison to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) had a lower nadir value of SpO(2) with no other significant difference. CONCLUSION: High-flow nasal cannula led to greater oxygenation and prevented desaturation spells more effectively in comparison with low-flow devices like nasal cannula, venturi mask, etc., and may be considered as an alternative to NIV during bronchoscopy in certain high-risk patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Roy A, Khanna P, Chowdhury SR, Haritha D, Sarkar S. The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(10):1131–1140. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9983664/ /pubmed/36876212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24339 Text en Copyright © 2022; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author (s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Roy, Avishek Khanna, Puneet Chowdhury, Sumit Roy Haritha, Damarla Sarkar, Soumya The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses |
title | The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses |
title_full | The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses |
title_short | The Impact of High-flow Nasal Cannula vs Other Oxygen Delivery Devices during Bronchoscopy under Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses |
title_sort | impact of high-flow nasal cannula vs other oxygen delivery devices during bronchoscopy under sedation: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36876212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT royavishek theimpactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT khannapuneet theimpactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT chowdhurysumitroy theimpactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT harithadamarla theimpactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT sarkarsoumya theimpactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT royavishek impactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT khannapuneet impactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT chowdhurysumitroy impactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT harithadamarla impactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT sarkarsoumya impactofhighflownasalcannulavsotheroxygendeliverydevicesduringbronchoscopyundersedationasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses |