Cargando…
Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568 |
_version_ | 1784900701669818368 |
---|---|
author | Lipton, Richard B. Pozo-Rosich, Patricia Blumenfeld, Andrew M. Li, Ye Severt, Lawrence Stokes, Jonathan T. Creutz, Lela Gandhi, Pranav Dodick, David |
author_facet | Lipton, Richard B. Pozo-Rosich, Patricia Blumenfeld, Andrew M. Li, Ye Severt, Lawrence Stokes, Jonathan T. Creutz, Lela Gandhi, Pranav Dodick, David |
author_sort | Lipton, Richard B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4–14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function–Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function–Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)–6 scores. RESULTS: Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: −2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: −1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: −3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: −2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: −1.19; p = 0.086; PI: −1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. DISCUSSION: Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777059. Submitted: December 13, 2018; First patient enrolled: December 14, 2018. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03777059. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that daily atogepant is associated with improvements in health-related quality-of-life measures in patients with 4–14 migraine days per month. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9984220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99842202023-03-04 Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial Lipton, Richard B. Pozo-Rosich, Patricia Blumenfeld, Andrew M. Li, Ye Severt, Lawrence Stokes, Jonathan T. Creutz, Lela Gandhi, Pranav Dodick, David Neurology Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4–14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function–Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function–Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)–6 scores. RESULTS: Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: −2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: −1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: −3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: −2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: −1.19; p = 0.086; PI: −1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. DISCUSSION: Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777059. Submitted: December 13, 2018; First patient enrolled: December 14, 2018. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03777059. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that daily atogepant is associated with improvements in health-related quality-of-life measures in patients with 4–14 migraine days per month. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9984220/ /pubmed/36396451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lipton, Richard B. Pozo-Rosich, Patricia Blumenfeld, Andrew M. Li, Ye Severt, Lawrence Stokes, Jonathan T. Creutz, Lela Gandhi, Pranav Dodick, David Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
title | Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
title_full | Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
title_short | Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial |
title_sort | effect of atogepant for preventive migraine treatment on patient-reported outcomes in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 advance trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liptonrichardb effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT pozorosichpatricia effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT blumenfeldandrewm effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT liye effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT severtlawrence effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT stokesjonathant effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT creutzlela effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT gandhipranav effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial AT dodickdavid effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial |