Cargando…

Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipton, Richard B., Pozo-Rosich, Patricia, Blumenfeld, Andrew M., Li, Ye, Severt, Lawrence, Stokes, Jonathan T., Creutz, Lela, Gandhi, Pranav, Dodick, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568
_version_ 1784900701669818368
author Lipton, Richard B.
Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
Blumenfeld, Andrew M.
Li, Ye
Severt, Lawrence
Stokes, Jonathan T.
Creutz, Lela
Gandhi, Pranav
Dodick, David
author_facet Lipton, Richard B.
Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
Blumenfeld, Andrew M.
Li, Ye
Severt, Lawrence
Stokes, Jonathan T.
Creutz, Lela
Gandhi, Pranav
Dodick, David
author_sort Lipton, Richard B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4–14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function–Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function–Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)–6 scores. RESULTS: Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: −2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: −1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: −3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: −2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: −1.19; p = 0.086; PI: −1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. DISCUSSION: Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777059. Submitted: December 13, 2018; First patient enrolled: December 14, 2018. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03777059. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that daily atogepant is associated with improvements in health-related quality-of-life measures in patients with 4–14 migraine days per month.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9984220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99842202023-03-04 Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial Lipton, Richard B. Pozo-Rosich, Patricia Blumenfeld, Andrew M. Li, Ye Severt, Lawrence Stokes, Jonathan T. Creutz, Lela Gandhi, Pranav Dodick, David Neurology Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4–14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function–Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine–Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function–Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)–6 scores. RESULTS: Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: −2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: −1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: −3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: −2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: −1.19; p = 0.086; PI: −1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. DISCUSSION: Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777059. Submitted: December 13, 2018; First patient enrolled: December 14, 2018. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03777059. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that daily atogepant is associated with improvements in health-related quality-of-life measures in patients with 4–14 migraine days per month. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9984220/ /pubmed/36396451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lipton, Richard B.
Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
Blumenfeld, Andrew M.
Li, Ye
Severt, Lawrence
Stokes, Jonathan T.
Creutz, Lela
Gandhi, Pranav
Dodick, David
Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
title Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
title_full Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
title_short Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial
title_sort effect of atogepant for preventive migraine treatment on patient-reported outcomes in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 advance trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568
work_keys_str_mv AT liptonrichardb effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT pozorosichpatricia effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT blumenfeldandrewm effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT liye effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT severtlawrence effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT stokesjonathant effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT creutzlela effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT gandhipranav effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial
AT dodickdavid effectofatogepantforpreventivemigrainetreatmentonpatientreportedoutcomesintherandomizeddoubleblindphase3advancetrial